Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03314
Original file (BC-2005-03314.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03314
      INDEX CODE:  110.00
      COUNSEL:  JERRY L. BERRY

      HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE:  1 MARCH 2007

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  under  other  than  honorable  conditions  (undesirable)  discharge  be
upgraded to honorable.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His discharge should  be  changed  to  honorable  for  “Convenience  of  the
Government.”   He  has  been  diagnosed  with  non-Hodgkin’s  lymphoma   and
positive for post-traumatic stress disorder.  He has never  filed  a  claim.
His undesirable discharge was unwarranted.  He earned the  Vietnam  National
Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service medal with Bronze  Star  and  the
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

In support of his application, he submits an  unsigned  affidavit  from  his
counsel, a copy of an excerpt from an unidentified VA  instruction,  a  copy
of a newspaper article, a copy of his separation document,  and  a  copy  of
his statement  of  petition.   The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records are  incomplete.   There  was  no
discharge case file  in  his  military  personnel  records.   The  following
information was extracted from the remaining  documentation  in  the  record
and documents provided by the applicant.

On 29 May 1969, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the  age  of  18  in
the grade  of  airman  basic  (E-1)  for  a  period  of  4  years.   He  was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first  class  (E-3)  effective
and with a date of rank of 1 January 1970.

On 10 February 1971, he received an Article 15 for being adjacent to an  off
limits area,  on  other  than  official  business.   For  this  offense,  he
forfeited $60.00 per month for two months.

On 21 October 1971, he received an Article 15 for failure to go at the  time
prescribed to his appointed  place  of  duty.   For  this  offense,  he  was
reduced to  the  grade  of  airman  basic  (E-1)  suspended,  unless  sooner
vacated.

On 8 March 1972, he was discharged under other  than  honorable  conditions.
He had served two years and nine months on active duty and had ten  days  of
lost time due to absence without leave and confinement.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation  (FBI)
provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the  former  member
(Identification Record No. 2145420J7) (Exhibit F).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DPPRS has no recommendation.  DPPRS states they are unable to determine  the
propriety of the discharge  based  on  the  lack  of  documentation  in  the
applicant’s record.  DPPRS notes the applicant did not submit  any  evidence
or identify  any  errors  or  injustices  that  occurred  in  the  discharge
processing.  DPPRS defers to the Board to determine if the applicant  should
be granted relief based on  the  limited  supporting  documentation  in  his
record (Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In his response to the Air Force evaluation, dated  21  February  2006,  the
applicant provided his detailed explanation in  regards  to  his  discharge,
along with copies of documentation extracted from his  discharge  case  file
and medical records.  His complete submission is at Exhibit E.

On 27 February  2006,  the  applicant  was  invited  to  submit  information
pertaining to his post-service accomplishments.  On 16 March  2006,  a  copy
of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) report was  forwarded  to  the
applicant.   To this date, no response has  been  received  on  any  of  the
aforementioned correspondence.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   After  careful  consideration  of  the
available evidence and in the absence of evidence by the  applicant  to  the
contrary, we believe that the actions taken to  effect  his  discharge  were
proper and in compliance with the provisions of  the  governing  regulations
in  effect  at  that  time.    In  addition,  the  applicant   provided   no
documentary evidence to support  his  allegations  that  his  discharge  was
unwarranted or that the disciplinary actions taken against him were  unjust.
 In view of this fact and in the absence of more expansive evidence  by  the
applicant attesting to a successful post-service adjustment  during  the  34
years after his discharge from  service,  we  are  not  inclined  to  extend
clemency in this case.  Therefore, we find no  basis  to  warrant  favorable
action on this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  2005-03314   in
Executive Session on 20 April 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

           Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
           Ms. Debra Walker, Member
           Mr. Elwood C Lewis III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Oct 05 w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 27 Jan 06.
     Exhibit D.  Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 06;
                 AFBCMR, dated 27 Feb & 15 Mar 06.
     Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 21 Feb 06 w/atchs.
     Exhibit F.  FBI Report.




                                  MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
                                  Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00130

    Original file (BC-2006-00130.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was again placed in confinement until 19 April 1954. The discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. DPPRS states the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in affect at that time and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01438

    Original file (BC-2006-01438.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The board convened on 18 Mar 55 and recommended the applicant be discharged with an undesirable characterization for unfitness, and the discharge authority approved the discharge. A complete copy of the HQ AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 8 Jun 06, the applicant indicates he began drinking when his squadron was transferred to Japan because they had too...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02153

    Original file (BC-2006-02153.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02153 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 JANUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 27 March 1989, the discharge authority directed that she be discharged with a general under honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-004334

    Original file (BC-2006-004334.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00434 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not submit any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03007

    Original file (BC-2005-03007.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 December 1990, the applicant submitted a request to his commander that he be discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 2 August 1991, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to general. We have reviewed the evidence provided and are unable to conclude corrective action is warranted based on an injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509

    Original file (BC-2006-00509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he was forwarded a copy of the FBI report. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03367

    Original file (BC-2005-03367.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 March 1981, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic for a period of 6 years. For this offense, she received a Letter of Counseling (LOC). We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00166

    Original file (BC-2006-00166.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, after thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that the comments of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility are supported by the evidence of record. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the applicant's submission, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01797

    Original file (BC-2005-01797.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Jul 05 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03886

    Original file (BC-2005-03886.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A copy of the applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged on 31 August 1991 with a bad conduct discharge with his reason for discharge as “Conviction by Court-martial.” He served 3 years, 5 months and 20 days of active duty. JAJM states that the applicant is not contending any specific actions have been taken by reviewing authorities that require correction of his record.