RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03314
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: JERRY L. BERRY
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 1 MARCH 2007
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His discharge should be changed to honorable for “Convenience of the
Government.” He has been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and
positive for post-traumatic stress disorder. He has never filed a claim.
His undesirable discharge was unwarranted. He earned the Vietnam National
Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service medal with Bronze Star and the
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
In support of his application, he submits an unsigned affidavit from his
counsel, a copy of an excerpt from an unidentified VA instruction, a copy
of a newspaper article, a copy of his separation document, and a copy of
his statement of petition. The applicant’s complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s military personnel records are incomplete. There was no
discharge case file in his military personnel records. The following
information was extracted from the remaining documentation in the record
and documents provided by the applicant.
On 29 May 1969, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in
the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of 4 years. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) effective
and with a date of rank of 1 January 1970.
On 10 February 1971, he received an Article 15 for being adjacent to an off
limits area, on other than official business. For this offense, he
forfeited $60.00 per month for two months.
On 21 October 1971, he received an Article 15 for failure to go at the time
prescribed to his appointed place of duty. For this offense, he was
reduced to the grade of airman basic (E-1) suspended, unless sooner
vacated.
On 8 March 1972, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions.
He had served two years and nine months on active duty and had ten days of
lost time due to absence without leave and confinement.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the former member
(Identification Record No. 2145420J7) (Exhibit F).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DPPRS has no recommendation. DPPRS states they are unable to determine the
propriety of the discharge based on the lack of documentation in the
applicant’s record. DPPRS notes the applicant did not submit any evidence
or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge
processing. DPPRS defers to the Board to determine if the applicant should
be granted relief based on the limited supporting documentation in his
record (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response to the Air Force evaluation, dated 21 February 2006, the
applicant provided his detailed explanation in regards to his discharge,
along with copies of documentation extracted from his discharge case file
and medical records. His complete submission is at Exhibit E.
On 27 February 2006, the applicant was invited to submit information
pertaining to his post-service accomplishments. On 16 March 2006, a copy
of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) report was forwarded to the
applicant. To this date, no response has been received on any of the
aforementioned correspondence.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of the
available evidence and in the absence of evidence by the applicant to the
contrary, we believe that the actions taken to effect his discharge were
proper and in compliance with the provisions of the governing regulations
in effect at that time. In addition, the applicant provided no
documentary evidence to support his allegations that his discharge was
unwarranted or that the disciplinary actions taken against him were unjust.
In view of this fact and in the absence of more expansive evidence by the
applicant attesting to a successful post-service adjustment during the 34
years after his discharge from service, we are not inclined to extend
clemency in this case. Therefore, we find no basis to warrant favorable
action on this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR 2005-03314 in
Executive Session on 20 April 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
Ms. Debra Walker, Member
Mr. Elwood C Lewis III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Oct 05 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 27 Jan 06.
Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 06;
AFBCMR, dated 27 Feb & 15 Mar 06.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 21 Feb 06 w/atchs.
Exhibit F. FBI Report.
MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00130
He was again placed in confinement until 19 April 1954. The discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. DPPRS states the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in affect at that time and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01438
The board convened on 18 Mar 55 and recommended the applicant be discharged with an undesirable characterization for unfitness, and the discharge authority approved the discharge. A complete copy of the HQ AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 8 Jun 06, the applicant indicates he began drinking when his squadron was transferred to Japan because they had too...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02153
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02153 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 JANUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 27 March 1989, the discharge authority directed that she be discharged with a general under honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-004334
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00434 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not submit any...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03007
On 10 December 1990, the applicant submitted a request to his commander that he be discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 2 August 1991, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to general. We have reviewed the evidence provided and are unable to conclude corrective action is warranted based on an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509
DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he was forwarded a copy of the FBI report. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03367
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 March 1981, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic for a period of 6 years. For this offense, she received a Letter of Counseling (LOC). We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00166
However, after thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that the comments of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility are supported by the evidence of record. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the applicant's submission, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01797
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Jul 05 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03886
A copy of the applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged on 31 August 1991 with a bad conduct discharge with his reason for discharge as “Conviction by Court-martial.” He served 3 years, 5 months and 20 days of active duty. JAJM states that the applicant is not contending any specific actions have been taken by reviewing authorities that require correction of his record.