Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03013
Original file (BC-2005-03013.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03013
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  4 Apr 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, traumatic  arthritis  of  the  left
knee, be assessed as combat related in order  to  qualify  for  compensation
under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His disabilities began when he was stationed in Thailand in  September  1972
as a crew chief on F-111 aircraft doing bombing missions into Vietnam.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application.  His complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  10
Jun 70.  He was progressively promoted to the grade of  technical  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  Aug  85.
He served as an Aircraft  Maintenance  Specialist  for  one  year  and  four
months and served the remainder of his Career  as  a  Mental  Health  Clinic
Technician.
A  Medical  Evaluation  Board  convened  on  24  Oct  89  to  consider   the
applicant's   conditions    of    glaucomato-cylitic    crisis,    bilateral
chondromalacia  patella  first  right  then  left;  left  manisectomy   with
evidence of degenerative joint  disease,  and  hypercholerterolinemia.   The
board recommended he be returned to duty.  He voluntarily retired  from  the
Air Force for years of service on 30 Jun 90, having served 20 years  and  21
days on active duty.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 20% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 9 Dec 04 and 13 Dec  05  based  upon
the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were  determined  not
to be combat-related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states he initially  indicated  that  his
knee condition was the result  of  injuries  received  while  seeking  cover
during an enemy attack in 1972.  In his appeal, he  stated  he  injured  his
left knee during an alert exercise in 1979 while  wearing  chemical  warfare
gear.  DPPD provides a review of the pertinent data in his  medical  records
and states no evidence can be found to confirm his description  of  how  his
knee was injured.  His records contain a long history  of  sports  injuries;
however, conditions developed from these types of injuries do not  meet  the
parameters of for CRSC.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states that in accordance with  Public  Law  107-314,  his  unit's
mission in  Thailand  constitutes  armed  conflict  and  hazardous  service.
Attachments  provided  show  that  while  assigned  to   Thailand   he   was
experiencing depression, anxiety, and facial swelling as  a  result  of  the
stresses of war.  He was later referred to a psychiatrist for a  psychiatric
evaluation and leg examination.  His entrance  physical  shows  no  problems
associated with his injuries which were incurred while on  active  duty.   A
medical board found various conditions that he did not have when he  entered
the Air Force.

His complete response, with attachments is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred  as  the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the
performance  of  duty  under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through   an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, does  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2005-
03013 in Executive Session on 28 Feb 06, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Sep 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 18 Nov 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 05.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 4 Jan 06.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04055

    Original file (BC-2003-04055.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His left knee condition is not considered service connected by the DVA. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02706

    Original file (BC-2004-02706.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his spinal disc condition and knee prosthesis are not combat related. Medical documentation dated 6 Mar 57, states his injuries were incurred when he jumped off a truck. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00169

    Original file (BC-2005-00169.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00169 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hypertension, spinal disc condition, and bilateral knee conditions, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01969

    Original file (BC-2004-01969.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application an aircraft loss record, and witness statements. He served 21 years, 2 months, and 19 days on active duty Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his post-op residuals, left knee, has not been rated by the DVA as service connected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00285

    Original file (BC-2005-00285.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00285 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, shoulder condition, conditions of the skeletal system, and back strain, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01986

    Original file (BC-2004-01986.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 19 Apr 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his skin condition is not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jan 05...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00404

    Original file (BC-2007-00404.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states although his conditions have been service-connected by the DVA, CRSC criteria require documentation to support a qualifying combat-related event or events as the direct cause of the disability. Additionally, the CRSC Board noted his Impaired Hearing is considered combat-related and approved it for CRSC; however, since it is currently rated at zero percent, he will not receive compensation at this time. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03782

    Original file (BC-2003-03782.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03782 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, paralysis of left ulnar nerve, limited flexion of knee, and left shoulder bursitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00741

    Original file (BC-2004-00741.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00741 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Sep 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, knee prosthesis (both knees), traumatic arthritis (left wrist and elbow), limited motion of wrist, and traumatic injury to the ear canals, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00761

    Original file (BC-2004-00761.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation extracted from his DVA and military medical records. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, applicant provided additional documents extracted from his medical records. Exhibit E. Medical Record Excerpts.