Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02963
Original file (BC-2005-02963.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02963
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for  service
in participation of Operation Urgent Fury.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Award of the AFEM may have been omitted by mistake upon his  discharge
or it may have been authorized/awarded after his  discharge  and  thus
was not properly recorded on his DD Form 214, Certificate  of  Release
or Discharge from Active Duty.  During Operation Urgent Fury  (Granada
– 23 October 1983 to 21 November 1983) he was assigned  to  the  317th
Avionics Squadron at Pope AFB, NC.  While he personally did not deploy
from the base, he was assigned to work many continuous long hours with
no days off in  direct  support  of  the  continuously  departing  and
arriving aircraft assigned to the mission.  He contends he would  like
to be properly and rightfully recognized as a contributing participant
in support of the US Armed Forces during a time of military  conflict.
He asks that he be advised of his eligibility for award  of  the  AFEM
based on the information included on his DD Form 149, Application  for
Correction of Military Record.

In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a copy of his  DD
Form 214.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 July 1981.   He  was
progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman with an effective
and date of rank of 1 October 1984.  He was released from active  duty
with an honorable discharge  effective  29  July  1985,  after  having
served for four years.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial.  DPPPR  notes  the  applicant’s  unit
deployed in support of Operation Urgent Fury but there is no  evidence
the applicant deployed with his unit.  In fact, his own  statement  on
his application confirms he did not deploy from his base.   Therefore,
after a complete and  thorough  review  of  his  military  record  and
supporting documentation, DPPPR noted that  though  he  supported  the
deployment of his unit, he did not  deploy  and  is  consequently  not
eligible for the award of the AFEM.

DPPPR’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
18 November 2005 for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of  this
date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  The applicant stated in his application while  he
supported  the  deployment,  he  did  not  actually  leave  his  base.
Eligibility for the  award  was  contingent  on  physical  deployment.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-02963 in  Executive  Session  on  16  February  2006,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
      Ms. Donna Jonkoff, Member
      Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Sep 05, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 10 Nov 05.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Nov 05.




                                   MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01679

    Original file (BC-2007-01679.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01679 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 1 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no documentary evidence that would...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03887

    Original file (BC-2002-03887.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. DPPPR states that the applicant’s record only contains one DD Form 214, showing he served on active duty during the period 1 October 1981 - 30 September 1985, with no foreign service. The Air Force Expeditionary Medal is awarded to service members who were in Grenada during the Grenada Operation (URGENT FURY) for the period 23 October 1983 - 21 November 1983.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00836

    Original file (BC-2005-00836.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request be denied, and states, in part, the applicant was deployed in support of ONW and OEF, while assigned to Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, from December 2000 to March 2002. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit F. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Under the heading...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801432

    Original file (9801432.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01432 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: YES JAN 13m ' Applicant requests that he be awarded the Armed Forces Medal (AFEM) , or other appropriate expeditionary Expeditionary medal, for his service in direct support of operations in Grenada between 23 October 1983 and 21 November 1983. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02881

    Original file (BC-2005-02881.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and a response from the Air Force Historical Studies Office concerning the AFEM, and a fact sheet on the AFEM. The applicant was in the Air Force during this time period, but there is no documentation in the record to substantiate that he participated in direct support of either operation. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03197

    Original file (BC 2014 03197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03197 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect all awards and decorations received. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103252

    Original file (0103252.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 February 2002 for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00622

    Original file (BC-2008-00622.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits his DD Form 214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 March 2008 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02127

    Original file (BC-2012-02127.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 September 1986, he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service and credited with completing 3 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active duty service. However, they believe the applicant is requesting award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for service in support of operations in Grenada. He states his unit was awarded the AFEM but he was told he could not receive the medal because he did not have two years of service and would receive the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000044

    Original file (20110000044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders to South Korea, dated 27June 1975 * Two DA Forms 67-7 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report) for the periods September 1975 - 9 September 1976 and September 1976 - November 1976 * PCS orders from South Korea, dated 9 August 1976 * Certificate of Achievement, dated 1 June 1985 * Three DA Forms 67-8 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report) for the...