Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00622
Original file (BC-2008-00622.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-00622
            INDEX CODE:      107.00
XXXXXXX     COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Grenada campaign badge.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was on active duty from December 1979 to August  1986  which  covers  the
period of the Grenada campaign of October 1983 to November 1983.

In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  submits  his  DD  Form   214
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 November 1983.

On 5 August 1986, he was discharged in the grade of staff sergeant  with  an
honorable discharge.

He served 6 years, 7 months and 19 days on active duty.

_______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUAION:

AFPC/DPSIDR  recommends  denial.   DPSIDR  states  the  applicant   requests
entitlement to any awards awarded for support of the Grenada Operation  from
October 1983 to November 1983.  The awarding period  for  the  Armed  Forces
Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) is from 23 October 1983 to 21 November  1983  for
the Grenada Operation URGENT FURY which  occurred  on  25  October  1983  to
15 November 1983.  In order to be awarded the AFEM  he  would  have  had  to
have served in Grenada during the conflict in support  of  Operation  URGENT
FURY.  After a thorough review of his military records,  DPSIDR  was  unable
to verify he was in Grenada during the conflict, also his DD Form  214  does
not reflect foreign service.  He did not provide any  documents  such  as  a
travel voucher to substantiate his claim.

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  28
March 2008 for review and comment within 30 days.  As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
he has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in  absence
of evidence to the contrary, we  find  no  basis  upon  which  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  BC-2005-03723  in  Executive
Session on 6 May 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
            Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
            Mr. Don H. Kendrick, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered under  Docket  Number  BC-
2008-00622:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 January 2008, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 12 March 2008.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 March 2008.




            KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
            Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04087

    Original file (BC-2011-04087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR states, after a complete review of the applicant’s case, and in view of the absence of official documentation verifying the applicant’s participation in OUF, they must recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the AFEM. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSI evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02127

    Original file (BC-2012-02127.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 September 1986, he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service and credited with completing 3 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active duty service. However, they believe the applicant is requesting award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for service in support of operations in Grenada. He states his unit was awarded the AFEM but he was told he could not receive the medal because he did not have two years of service and would receive the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01679

    Original file (BC-2007-01679.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01679 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 1 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no documentary evidence that would...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03887

    Original file (BC-2002-03887.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. DPPPR states that the applicant’s record only contains one DD Form 214, showing he served on active duty during the period 1 October 1981 - 30 September 1985, with no foreign service. The Air Force Expeditionary Medal is awarded to service members who were in Grenada during the Grenada Operation (URGENT FURY) for the period 23 October 1983 - 21 November 1983.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02849

    Original file (BC-2012-02849.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSID recommends denial of the AFEM. DPSID state they were unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s military personnel record that verifies he was deployed to the qualifying area of responsibility (AOR) in support of operations in Grenada for award of the AFEM. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010127

    Original file (20120010127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he participated in Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada in 1983. Qualifying service for this award includes participation in Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada during the period 23 October 1983 through 21 November 1983. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Since there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence that shows he participated in Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada in 1983, there is no basis for granting his requests.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02963

    Original file (BC-2005-02963.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPPR notes the applicant’s unit deployed in support of Operation Urgent Fury but there is no evidence the applicant deployed with his unit. Therefore, after a complete and thorough review of his military record and supporting documentation, DPPPR noted that though he supported the deployment of his unit, he did not deploy and is consequently not eligible for the award of the AFEM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000044

    Original file (20110000044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders to South Korea, dated 27June 1975 * Two DA Forms 67-7 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report) for the periods September 1975 - 9 September 1976 and September 1976 - November 1976 * PCS orders from South Korea, dated 9 August 1976 * Certificate of Achievement, dated 1 June 1985 * Three DA Forms 67-8 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report) for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03197

    Original file (BC 2014 03197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03197 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect all awards and decorations received. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02275

    Original file (BC-2002-02275.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02275 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a campaign medal for participation in “Operation Urgent Fury.” ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records...