RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02088
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JAN 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She desires her RE code changed to reenlist in the Air Force.
In support of her request, the applicant provided documents extracted from
her military personnel and medical records.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 17 February 2004 in the
grade of airman basic. On 20 July 2004, applicant was notified by her
commander of his intent to recommend that she be discharged from the Air
Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.14.
The specific reason for this action was the Chronological Record of Medical
Care letter, dated 30 June 2004, which states the applicant was diagnosed
with patellofemoral syndrome. It was determined this condition existed
prior to service and had not been permanently aggravated by the service.
She was advised of her rights in this matter and acknowledged receipt of
the notification on that same date. The applicant waived her right to
consult counsel and elected not to submit statements on her own behalf. In
a legal review of the case file, the deputy chief, adverse actions found
the case legally sufficient and recommended that she be discharged. The
discharge authority concurred with the recommendations and directed that
she be discharged with an entry level separation. The applicant was
discharged on 27 July 2004. She served 5 months and 11 days on active
duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The BCMR Medical
Consultant states evidence of record shows the applicant was unable to
participate in and complete the physical requirements of military training
due to knee pain diagnosed as patellofemoral pain syndrome existing prior
to service. Her symptoms persisted despite excusal from physical training
and treatment with medication and physical therapy leading to medical
disqualification for military service due to her condition. Department of
Veterans Affairs documentation indicates persistent symptoms three months
following separation from the service.
The fact that she is doing well now does not predict that she will not
again experience duty limiting knee pain when exposed to the rigors of
military training. Past experience with patellofemoral pain syndrome
refractory to rest and medication is predictive of recurrence under similar
circumstances. The Air Force cannot guarantee a sedentary occupation, and
even members in sedentary occupations are required to maintain physical
fitness including running and are often required to deploy and perform
vigorous activities in operational settings. In the applicant’s case, the
rapid onset so soon in training and the persisting nature of symptoms
indicate that limiting symptoms will onset so soon in training and the
persisting nature of symptoms indicate that limiting symptoms will recur
with training and that she is therefore a poor candidate for reentry.
The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 28 July 2006, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review
and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, it is our opinion that
given the circumstances surrounding her separation from the Air Force, the
RE code assigned (2C) was proper and in compliance with the appropriate
directives. The applicant has not provided any evidence which would lead
us to believe otherwise. Therefore, we agree with the BCMR Medical
Consultant and adopt his rational as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-
02088 in Executive Session on 13 September 2006, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
Mr. Gary G. Sauner, Member
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Jun 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 24 Jul 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 06.
MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01490
During the medical evaluation it was determined that past medical history included “occasional right knee pain prior to enlistment for two - three years.” She was diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome, placed on limited duty (no physical conditioning or running) for 10 days and prescribed Motrin. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01952
Otherwise, a permanent profile change to limit these activities may be considered.” The commander stated in his letter to the Physical Evaluation Board the applicant was assigned to less strenuous duties which did not require prolonged periods of standing, walking or squatting. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant was diagnosed with bilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome (chronic...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00978
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00978 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation of Disability, Existed Prior to Service (EPTS), Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) be changed to a service connected disability. The IPEB found the applicant unfit and recommended discharge noting the applicants medical condition, EPTS and had not been permanently aggravated...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01155 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service, separation authority, separation code JFC, narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) 2C code be changed so that he may pursue a career in the military. The Air Force based this on the reported...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00010
The Commander’s statement lumps the peripheral nerve symptoms in with the neck pain and ‘shoulder pain’ when describing interference with her performance. The only other condition rated and service-connected by the VA is a headache condition. The Board has no reasonable basis for recommending the shoulder or headache conditions as additional unfitting conditions for separation rating, and does not have jurisdiction for considering tinnitus.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04510
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Narrative Summary states her condition of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) was not present at the time of the medical history intake and physical examination and the doctor crossed out Existed Prior to Enlistment. She did not have knee problems prior to her enlistment. Therefore, someone at the Review Board Office must have agreed with her and the physician of record that her condition was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03092
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03092 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that she may enlist in the Navy. The basis for the action was on 7 March 1996, a medical evaluation board found she did not meet minimum medical standards to join the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01236
On 26 July 2001, the SAFPC determined the applicant was physically unfit for continued military service due to a physical disability which existed prior to service and directed she be separated without disability benefits. The disability processing records indicate the applicant was treated fairly throughout her DES process and was properly rated under disability laws and policy at the time of her medical discharge. The applicant’s case was processed through the medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03702
The Medical Consultant states the applicant was disability separated with severance pay due to chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome that significantly interfered with performance of military duties despite prolonged restrictions of activity and duty, and appropriate medical care including rest, medication, and physical therapy. The applicant submits a June 2005 medical statement stating he is medically cleared to participate in activity associated with military service in support of his...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00467
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued military service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating XXXXXXXXXX be corrected to show that the diagnoses in her...