RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01917
INDEX CODE: 128.05
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 OCT 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to entitle him to household goods (HHG)
transportation to his home of selection (HOS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had a brain tumor with memory loss and was unable to conduct
business and had difficulty remembering to perform tasks.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, a
copy of a Neurology Outpatient Progress Note, Veterans Industries
Vocational Rehabilitation Program Letter, AF Form 781, Multiple Item
Prescription, Special Orders Number AC-002820 and a copy of an
Extension of travel and Transportation Entitlements Letter.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force on 1 July 1997, in
the grade of master sergeant. The applicant entered college during
the one year period following termination of active duty. He
requested and received an extension of his transportation entitlements
from 30 June 1998 to 30 June 1999.
On 21 April 2003, the applicant was referred to a clinic by his social
worker for an assessment, because he was failing the college program.
Upon admission to the Incentive Work Therapy (IWT) program he was
diagnosed with depression, post traumatic stress disorder, bipolar I
disorder and a benign brain tumor.
On 3 October 2003, the applicant dropped out of the education program
due to his frustration over his inability to retain information and to
pursue a day treatment social therapy program.
His spouse states he had a very rare brain tumor and doctors watched
it for 3 years before deciding to remove it in July 2004.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
JPPSO-SAT/ECAF states in view of the 6-year statute of limitations
regarding travel after release from active duty, JPPSO is without
authority to recommend approval in this case. A member on active
duty is authorized HHG transportation from the last or any previous
duty station, from a designated place in CONUS, from storage, or any
combination thereof, to the member’s home of selection. Except for
members undergoing hospitalization, medical treatment, education or
training, or in other deserving cases, the HHG must be turned over for
transportation within one year following termination of active duty.
Under the provision of paragraph U5012-I, JFTR, the 1-year time limit
may be extended using the Secretarial Process. However, and extension
may not be authorized/approved if it extends travel and transpiration
allowances for more than 6 years from the date of separation or
release from active duty or retirement unless a certified on-going
medical condition prevents relocation of the member for longer than 6
years from the separation/retirement date.
Regarding extension of the travel time limit, the Comptroller General
of the United States has ruled that Congress intended travel to be the
result of separation from active duty. Decision B207157, 2 February
1983, states, “The primary requirement is that the travel be the
result of separation/retirement from the service, since it is not a
benefit which the separated/retired member retains until used
regardless of circumstances.”
In this case the applicant was released from active duty on 30 June
1997. He received an education extension that extended his travel and
transportation entitlements to 30 June 1999. His medical conditions
did not arise until September 2001, more than 2 years after his
entitlements had expired.
The JPPSO-SAT/ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states his condition started before 2001, but he was
unaware of it. He was experiencing memory loss and struggling with
classes in school, but did not realize what was going on until he
actually had the first seizure in 2001, which is when the tumor was
found. His surgeon stated that the tumor had been growing for ten
years or more. He and his wife requested another extension and the
application was supposed to have been sent to them, however they never
received the application. During this time the applicant was
experiencing difficulty completing tasks and was forced to drop out of
school due to his memory loss and mood swings.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After carefully reviewing the
evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, it is our
opinion the applicant should be entitled to transportation benefits
authorized for members retiring from the Air Force. Documentation
provided by the Commander of Neurosurgery, Wilford Hall Medical Center,
indicates that it is extremely likely that the applicant’s tumor was
present for at least ten years prior to its removal in July 2004. Thus,
it is almost certain it started during the time in which he was on
active duty. In view of the above and in order to resolve any potential
injustices to the applicant, we believe his records should be corrected
to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that competent
authority determined a certified on-going medical condition existed
that prevented relocation; and, in accordance with the provisions of
paragraph U5012-I, Joint Federal Travel Regulations, his travel and
transportation allowances were extended to 31 December 2005.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
01917 in Executive Session on 7 July 2005, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson III, Panel Chair
Ms. Sue A. Lumpkin Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jun 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, JPPSO-SAT/ECAF, dated 22 Jun 05.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jun 05.
Exhibit C. Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Jun 05, w/atch.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01917
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent
authority determined a certified on-going medical condition existed
that prevented relocation; and, in accordance with the provisions of
paragraph U5012-I, Joint Federal Travel Regulations, his travel and
transportation allowances were extended to 31 December 2005.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02941
Prior to expiration of her travel and transportation entitlements on 31 Jul 01, she requested an extension of the time limit for educational reasons. Since 31 Jul 01, the applicant’s travel and transportation entitlements have been extended in one-year increments as a member undergoing education or training, and she has been informed the approval did not extend her NTS entitlement beyond 31 Jul 01. She was also informed this was the final extension she would be granted, as there was no...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03447
She completed 20 years and 19 days of active service for retirement. Under the provisions of paragraph U5012-I, JFTR, a written time limit extension that includes an explanation of the circumstances justifying the extension may be authorized/approved for a specific additional time period using the Secretarial Process only when circumstances prevented use within the prescribed time; must be for the shortest time appropriate under the circumstances; not be granted merely to accommodate...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02486
An extension of the time limit would apply only for the amount of time the member was confined in a medical facility or deemed to be unable to travel due to medical reasons that occurred during the first year. An extension of the time limit would apply only for the amount of time the member was confined in a medical facility or deemed to be unable to travel due to medical reasons that occurred during the first year. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03655
ECAF states the applicant retired from active duty on 31 January 1992, and the reason he did not relocate within the one year following termination of active duty was not due to an unexpected event beyond his control, but due to his decision to obtain employment in the local area of his last duty station. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Dec...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02012
Per JFTR paragraph U5012-I, a written time extension that includes an explanation of circumstances justifying the extension may: 1) be authorized/approved for a specific additional time period using the Secretarial Process; 2) be authorized or approved only when circumstances prevent use within the prescribed time, and must be for the shortest time appropriate under the circumstances; 3) not be granted merely to accommodate personal preferences or conveniences (DoD/CG #99-1); and 4) not be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02157
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. JPPSO-SAT/ECAF states that members who retire from service with a home of selection (HOS) authorization are entitled to non-temporary storage from the date the retired orders are issued until 1 year from the date of termination of active duty. Under the provisions of paragraph U5365(D),...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03808
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was counseled that he is entitled to one year of storage following his retirement from the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00637
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00637 INDEX CODE: 128.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to repay all charges associated with the nontemporary storage (NTS) and have his shipping entitlements reinstated so he can reship his household goods (HHG) at government expense. Therefore, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00633
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02814
The entitlement begins on the date the orders are issued and terminates one year from the date of termination of active duty. However, evidence shows the applicant agreed to have his HHG shipped to Lancaster, CA, upon his separation from active duty and subsequently requested an extension of storage until 23 December 2005. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...