RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02380
INDEX CODE: 129.04
COUNSEL: American Legion
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Feb 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His rank at time of discharge be staff sergeant (SSgt) rather than
corporal (CPL).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reduction in rank was illegal because all records of his military
service show he was an excellent soldier.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s records are very limited, having been partially
destroyed by mold and the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records
Center (NPRC). Many of the available documents are very faint and
almost indecipherable.
The applicant enlisted in the Army Air Corps on 30 Oct 42 and served
as an armorer gunner for heavy bombers.
A military record reflected the applicant’s grade as SSgt on 9 May 43;
then as private on 22 Dec 43 with a temporary grade of CPL. From that
point on, his grade is reflected on documents as CPL. Nothing in the
available records revealed why he was reduced from SSgt. Some of his
records described his character/efficiency rating as “excellent,”
“satisfactory,” or “unknown.”
He was demobilized and honorably discharged in the grade of CPL on
17 Sep 45, after 2 years, 10 months, and 18 days of active service.
His WD AGO 53-55 reflects his highest grade held was SSgt. He
participated in the following World War II (WWII) battles/campaigns:
Air Offensive Europe, Normandy, Ardennes, Rhineland, Central Europe,
and Northern France. He received the Purple Heart for wounds
sustained in Oct 43 while on a mission over enemy-occupied territory
in the European Theater, the Distinguished Unit Badge, and the
European-African-Middle Eastern Service Medal with 1 Silver Star and 1
Bronze Star.
The applicant initially filed his appeal with the Army Review Boards
Agency; however, on 1 Jul 05, he was advised to forward his request to
the AFBCMR.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPWB notes the case is untimely and could be dismissed under
the equitable doctrine of laches, which denies relief to one who has
unreasonably and inexcusably delayed asserting a claim. The applicant
waited almost 60 years after discharge to petition the AFBCMR. His
unreasonable delay has caused prejudice to the Air Force as relevant
records have been destroyed or are no longer available, memories have
failed, and witnesses are unavailable. They find no documentation in
the available records concerning the applicant’s reduction from SSgt
to CPL. His separation document reflects the highest grade held was
SSgt. His request should be denied due to the lack of documentation.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant and his counsel on 7 Oct 05 for review and comment within 30
days. As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the possibility of an injustice and, as a result, we are inclined to
recommend granting the applicant’s request on the basis of clemency.
The applicant contends his reduction from SSgt to CPL was “illegal”
because his military records show he was “an excellent soldier.”
Unfortunately, his few remaining records provide no information as to
why he was reduced in grade, and he has submitted no evidence
supporting his assertion. Based on the presumption of regularity in
the conduct of governmental affairs, we assume the reduction was
proper and in compliance with appropriate directives at the time.
Nonetheless, we also note the applicant participated in numerous WWII
battles and campaigns, received the Purple Heart for wounds sustained
in a mission over the European Theater, as well as other decorations,
and was ultimately discharged with an honorable characterization.
While the reduction may have been warranted at the time, we are
convinced, on the basis of clemency, that some consideration should be
given to this applicant’s participation and personal sacrifice during
WWII. We do not believe he should be entitled to back pay and related
benefits, but we are persuaded his grade of SSgt should be restored
one day before his discharge. We find this a fitting compromise that
does not usurp the decisions of the applicant’s superiors, yet offers
him some small relief in recognition of his contributions during a
momentous period in our nation’s history.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 16 September
1945, he was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 30 November 2005 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-02380 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jun 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 27 Sep 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Oct 05.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-02380
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that, on
16 September 1945, he was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02452-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02452 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his rank reflect staff sergeant (SSgt) rather than private. In reference to the PH, he believes he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02269
In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided a personal statement, a Certificate of Death from the state of ---, a copy of a court document naming the deceased’s wife as executor of his estate, copies of orders awarding the Air Medal and an oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal to the deceased member, an obituary, a congressional request for information from C/M Jo Bonner of Alabama, a copy of the deceased members Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, a copy of his Army Qualification...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00479
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The former military member’s separation documents and enlistment records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 March 1948 with prior regular active duty Army service time of 2 years, 3 months and 10 days. He enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 15 September 1955 and served on active duty until 30 June 1968 at which time he was honorably relieved from active duty and retired in the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02856
Therefore, he was not eligible for promotion to airman until that date. He is granted a waiver and is eligible to reenlist in the Regular Air Force. He is granted a waiver and is eligible to reenlist in the Regular Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00183
On 16 September 2005, the applicant transferred to the Air Force Reserve where he is currently serving in the grade of senior airman (SrA) (E-4). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reinstate his promotion to SSgt. His complaint is not based on whether the commander has the authority to issue an LOR, but that the commander issued an LOR when he was aware no evidence was presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00929
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal letter, a copy of his DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a copy of his orders for gunnery school. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00829
His request claims his progress since returning to active duty has not only benefited him, “but has also benefited the Air Force as well.” The applicant’s specific request is that he be immediately promoted to E-4, skipping the time and performance requirements for promotion to E-2, to E-3 and to E-4. He was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of rank of 6 November 2004, and an effective date of 17 June 2004. b. He was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01060
Despite being invited to provide any materials he may have pertaining to his military service in general and the requested decorations in particular, the applicant has not responded. As such, we have no choice but to conclude the applicant has not established that an error or an injustice has occurred in this matter. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 4 August 2005 under...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02568
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 6 February 2003, competent authority set aside so much of the nonjudicial punishment under the provision of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03768
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAC evaluated the applicant’s claim that he was assigned outside his career field for four years and should have been retrained. The applicant’s claim he should have been afforded the opportunity to retrain into another career field because he was performing duties outside his primary AFSC for four years is also without merit. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...