RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01672
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: DVA
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 NOV 2006
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable
conditions).
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After all these years he needs to try to get his discharge upgraded
to acceptable standards. He does not have much time left and would
like to have his discharge changed before he leaves this earth.
This is his final request.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 Jul 52 for a
period of four years in the grade of airman basic.
On 30 Jan 53, applicant was convicted by Summary Court-Martial for
wrongfully and willfully discharging a firearm on the B-47 parking
ramp, on or about (o/a) 25 Jan 53, under circumstances such as to
endanger human life. For this offense, he was sentenced to
forfeiture of $50 and confinement at hard labor (CHL) for 30 days.
On 29 Oct 53, applicant was convicted by Special Court-Martial for
stealing three shirts, o/a 10 Jul 53, of a total value of $10.20;
for wrongfully appropriating a red sport shirt, o/a 5 Aug 53, of a
value of $4; for wrongfully appropriating a government vehicle, o/a
4 Sep 53, of a value of $1238.11, and for being absent without
leave (AWOL) from o/a 10 Oct 53 until 15 Oct 53. Applicant was
found guilty of all charges except wrongfully appropriating a
government vehicle. He was sentenced to CHL for six months and
forfeiture of $55 per month for six months.
On 13 Dec 55, applicant was convicted by Summary Court-Martial for
being AWOL from o/a 1 Dec until 3 Dec 55. For this offense he was
restricted to the limits of the base for 18 days and forfeiture of
$19.
On 4 May 56, applicant was convicted by Special Court-Martial for
two specification of stealing military pay certificates totaling
$23.80. His sentence consisted of a bad conduct discharge (BCD),
forfeiture of $65 per month for six months, and CHL for six months.
The sentence was adjudged on 8 May 56 and affirmed on 25 Sep 56.
On 4 Oct 56, applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge
in the grade of airman basic. He was credited with 3 years,
3 months, and 3 days of active duty service (excludes 346 days of
lost time due to AWOL and confinement).
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative
report which is attached at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and recommended denial.
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record,
they found the discharge consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.
Additionally, the discharge was within the sound discretion of the
discharge authority. They also noted applicant did not submit any
new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in
the discharge processing and provided no other facts warranting a
change to his character of service.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states that he has no recollection at all of the
incidents in 1960 cited on the FBI Report. After a few “run-ins”
with the law, he has served his time, and the best way to describe
it is he woke up. He has settled down with his wife of 41 years,
raised a family, and held a job until he retired after 20 years of
outstanding service. He cannot change his brief period of
rebellion that he truly regrets, but has lived an honest life after
his time served.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit G.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s
submission was thoroughly reviewed, and his contentions were duly
noted. However, we do not find his submission sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force.
The evidence of record indicates the applicant was convicted by
numerous courts-martial for discharging a fire arm, twice for
stealing, and for being absent without leave (AWOL). No evidence
has been presented which would lead us to believe that the
applicant’s service characterization was improper. Therefore,
based on his overall record of service, the numerous courts-martial
which precipitated his discharge, the contents of the FBI report,
and the absence of evidence related to his post-service activities
and accomplishments, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the
characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of
clemency.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-01672 in Executive Session on 21 September 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr., Member
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 May 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report of Investigation.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 7 Jun 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jun 05.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 Jul 05.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Jul 05.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02895
Applicant has also requested that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. After reviewing applicant’s overall record of service and based on the fact that under today’s standards he would receive an honorable discharge, we recommend approval of his request for an upgrade of his discharge. Show that on 26 April 1957, he was honorably discharged in the grade of master sergeant and furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00132
On 10 Feb 05, SAF/MRBR advised the applicant that, upon receiving his application, they researched the index of military personnel records stored at NPRC. Pursuant to a 3 Mar 05 request by the AFBCMR Staff, AFLSA/JAJM provided a copy of the applicant’s Record of Trial (ROT) and associated documents, including a legal review. The Board of Review did not recommend clemency and, on 24 Aug 56, the sentence was affirmed.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01912
His record has been good since leaving the Air Force and he has no arrests. The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 10 Aug 05, the AFBCMR staff offered the applicant an opportunity to provide information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01912 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03581
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and found that based on the documentation in the file, they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. However, based on the offense,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00278
Furthermore, in view of the repeated misconduct during his short period of service that resulted in his court-martial actions and subsequent discharge and the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of the applicant’s service on the basis of clemency is warranted. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge is not favorably considered. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00771
In addition, based on his overall record of service, the events which precipitated the discharge, and the contents of the FBI report, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Air Force Regulation 39-17A.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01303
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01303 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her husbands undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). On 19 Sep 60, the applicant, with counsel, appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB); however, the AFDRB considered and denied the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03609
Applicant was discharged with a BCD on 27 Sep 74. Based on his overall record of service, and in view of the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00146
In support of his request, the applicant submits personal statements and copies of her father’s DD Form 214 and Statement of Service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). After considering the evidence and testimony, the Board of Officers determined that the former member should be discharged with an undesirable discharge because of unfitness.