Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01912
Original file (BC-2005-01912.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                        DOCKET  NUMBER:   BC-2005-
01912
                                             INDEX CODE:  110.00

                                             COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO



MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  17 DECEMBER 2006


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His bad  conduct  discharge  be  upgraded  to  an  under  honorable
conditions (general) discharge.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has been a probation officer for the last 11 years.  His  record
has been good since leaving the Air Force and he has no arrests.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on  1  Sep  55,  for  a
period of four years, in the grade of airman  basic.   His  highest
grade held was airman third class.

On 13 Mar 56, applicant was tried and convicted by  special  court-
martial for being Absent Without Leave  (AWOL)  from  on  or  about
12 Dec 55 to 11 Jan 56 and from on or about 2 Feb 56 to 9  Feb  56.
He was sentenced to confinement  at  hard  labor  for  six  months,
forfeiture of $20.00 pay per month for  six  months,  reduction  in
grade to airman basic, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD) which  was
suspended until his release from confinement.  On 30  Mar  56,  the
Board of Review, United States Air Force, approved and affirmed the
findings of guilty and the sentence.

Applicant was discharged with a BCD on 13 Aug 56, in the  grade  of
airman basic.  He was credited with 3 months and 10 days of  active
military service (excludes 243 days of lost time due to confinement
and AWOL).

Pursuant to the request of the Board on 9 August 2005, the  Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV,  provided  a  copy  of  an
investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this  application  and  recommended  denial.
They stated, in part, that the discharge was  consistent  with  the
procedural  and   substantive   requirements   of   the   discharge
regulation.   The  discharge  was  within  the  discretion  of  the
discharge authority.  They also noted the applicant did not  submit
any evidence or identify any errors that occurred in the  discharge
processing.   Additionally,  the  applicant   provided   no   facts
warranting a change to his character of service.

The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 10 Aug 05, the AFBCMR staff offered the applicant an opportunity
to provide information pertaining to his activities  since  leaving
the service.  The  applicant  responded  with  a  personal  letter,
letters of character reference from a judge,  a  former  co-worker,
and an acquaintance of 35 years.  On 29 Aug 05, the Board  received
an additional letter of character reference from a friend.

Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit G.

In response to the FBI Report of  Investigation,  applicant  states
his company sends fingerprint cards to the Judicial  Council  every
few years, and his came back last month with the  same  information
about an arrest for theft on 13  Nov  62,  in  XXXXXXXXX,  LA.   He
provides a statement from the  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  Sheriff’s  Office,
indicating they were unable to locate a  bill  with  the  Clerk  of
Court,  and  no  information  on  this  arrest  could  be  located.
(Exhibit I).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  After a thorough review of the evidence of  record  we  see  no
evidence to show that the applicant’s discharge  was  erroneous  or
unjust.   However,  we  recognize  the  adverse   impact   of   the
applicant’s discharge; and while it may have  been  appropriate  at
the time, we believe it would be an injustice for the applicant  to
continue to suffer its effects.  From the  documentation  submitted
in support of his appeal, it  appears  the  applicant  has  been  a
responsible citizen and productive  member  of  society  since  his
separation.    Therefore,   we   believe   an   upgrade   of    the
characterization of  his  discharge  to  general  (under  honorable
conditions) is warranted on the basis of clemency.  Accordingly, we
recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 13 August 1956,
he was discharged with  service  characterized  as  general  (under
honorable conditions).

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2005-01912 in Executive Session on 21 September 2005, under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
      Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr., Member
      Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member

All members voted to correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Jun 05, w/atch.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  FBI Report of Investigation.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 6 Jul 05.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jul 05.
     Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Aug 05, w/atch.
     Exhibit G.  Letter from Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
     Exhibit H.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 Aug 05.
     Exhibit I.  Letter from Applicant, undated, w/atchs.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair



AFBCMR BC-2005-01912




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to [APPLICANT] be corrected to show that on 13
August 1956, he was discharged with service characterized as
general (under honorable conditions).





            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01672

    Original file (BC-2005-01672.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record, they found the discharge consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was convicted by numerous courts-martial for discharging a fire arm, twice for stealing, and for being absent without leave (AWOL).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02114

    Original file (BC-2005-02114.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Aug 05 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Jul 05. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00970

    Original file (BC-2005-00970.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 Apr 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied his request that his UOTHC discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded and that his felony conviction be erased from his civilian records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00367

    Original file (BC-2005-00367.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00367 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 AUG 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 16 May 74, after consulting with counsel, applicant waived his right to a hearing before...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01596

    Original file (BC-2005-01596.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed at the time of his discharge that six months subsequent his discharge he would be able to upgrade his character of service from general to honorable. The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that he did not recommend the applicant for rehabilitation or probation. The applicant provided a response, which is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02895

    Original file (BC-2002-02895.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant has also requested that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. After reviewing applicant’s overall record of service and based on the fact that under today’s standards he would receive an honorable discharge, we recommend approval of his request for an upgrade of his discharge. Show that on 26 April 1957, he was honorably discharged in the grade of master sergeant and furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02329

    Original file (BC-2005-02329.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received an Article 15, dated 11 January 1956, for failure to go to his place of duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2005-02329 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02327

    Original file (BC-2005-02327.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 12 Aug 05, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). Were you provided a response on a timely basis? No c. Could be improved d. N/A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS The Record of Proceedings (ROP) contains a summary of your request, your contentions, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900714

    Original file (9900714.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Under our broader mandate and after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances of applicant's case, the Board is persuaded that applicant has been a productive member of society since leaving the service. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 21 Jan 60, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00132

    Original file (BC-2005-00132.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Feb 05, SAF/MRBR advised the applicant that, upon receiving his application, they researched the index of military personnel records stored at NPRC. Pursuant to a 3 Mar 05 request by the AFBCMR Staff, AFLSA/JAJM provided a copy of the applicant’s Record of Trial (ROT) and associated documents, including a legal review. The Board of Review did not recommend clemency and, on 24 Aug 56, the sentence was affirmed.