Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01181
Original file (BC-2005-01181.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01181
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  9 OCT 2006


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected  to  show  he  was  awarded  the  Meritorious
Service Medal (MSM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Although he was never officially awarded the MSM, he believes since it
was listed on the DD Form 214 he received at his  retirement  and  was
listed  on  the  official  retirement  announcement,  he   should   be
authorized the medal.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement,
a letter from the National Personnel Records Center  (NPRC)  verifying
his authorized medals and awards, a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of
Separation from Active Duty from his official record, and a copy of  a
DD Form 214 he received at his retirement.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 15 July  1948  and  retired
from active duty in the grade of chief master  sergeant  on  1  August
1969.  He served 20 years, 16 days of active military service.

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
reflects award of the Air Force Commendation Medal w/1  OLC,  the  Air
Force Good Conduct Medal w/2 OLC, and  the  National  Defense  Service
Medal w/1 BSS.

On 27 August 2004, the applicant was asked by the NPRC  to  provide  a
copy of the order awarding him the  MSM,  to  enable  that  office  to
verify his entitlement of the award of the MSM.

On 22 November 2004, he responded  by  stating  he  was  not  formally
awarded the MSM at the time of his retirement, but  his  DD  Form  214
lists MSM, SOG-177, 29 July 1969.

On 18 March 2005, NPRC informed the applicant,  his  official  DD Form
214 does not show the MSM and without the official orders that  office
could not give him the MSM.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial.   There was no decoration recommendation
in the applicant’s master military record  to  indicate  he  had  been
recommended for the MSM.  DPPPR states that office  could  not  verify
entitlement without a special order indicating he was awarded the MSM.

The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6
May 05, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
applicant’s submission and the available evidence of  record,  we  are
not persuaded that he should be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal.
 We took notice of his complete submission in judging  the  merits  of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions  and  recommendation  of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the
victim of an error  or  injustice.   The  Board  notes  the  applicant
asserts he was presented the MSM at his retirement  ceremony  and  the
MSM is listed on a  copy  of  a  DD  214  which  he  received  at  his
retirement ceremony.  However, there was no evidence  presented  which
would lead us to believe that  a  recommendation  for  decoration  for
award of the MSM was submitted into  official  channels.   Should  the
applicant secure documentation  showing  the  medal  was  placed  into
official channels and an official  order  was  issued  approving  this
medal, the Board would reconsider his application.  In the absence  of
such evidence, we  find  no  compelling  basis  to  warrant  favorable
consideration of the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence no considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2005-
01181 in Executive Session on 29 June 2005, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
                 Ms. Patricia A. Robey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 05, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 25 Apr 05.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 May 05.







      GREGORY H. PETKOFF
      Panel Chair





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00519

    Original file (BC-2004-00519.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00519 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force Commendation Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM, 1 OLC), he was awarded for the period 6 July 2000 to 20 October 2001, be upgraded to the Meritorious Service Medal. Despite the fact the erroneous...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00718

    Original file (BC-2005-00718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00718 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he received the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). He was released from active duty on 22 April 1956 and transferred to the Air Force Reserves where he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00994

    Original file (BC-2005-00994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of all three official military records they were able to confirm the two crewmembers received the DFC for a number of bombardment missions flown over Europe in June 1944, and the applicant receiving the Air Medal w/3 OLC in June 1944. He requested the DFC through his congressman’s office in June 1996 and was informed a written recommendation was required for award of the DFC. The Board also notes, the applicant received the Air Medal w/3 OLC during the time both...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01013l

    Original file (BC-2005-01013l.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01013 INDEX CODE: 107.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 AUG 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). In support of his request, applicant submits a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03160

    Original file (BC-2004-03160.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There also was no decoration recommendation provided by the applicant or in his military records to indicate a SS recommendation was submitted. DPPPR states no individual can recommend himself or herself for a one- time reconsideration for decoration upgrade. As of this date, this office has received no response.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01500

    Original file (BC-2003-01500.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), fourth oak leaf cluster (4OLC), awarded for the period 16 November 98 through 23 July 2001, be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and he be considered for promotion by a Special Selection Board for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01363

    Original file (BC-2005-01363.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the applicant has not provided any evidence to reflect a second JMUA was awarded. However, there is no evidence in the applicant’s records indicating she served in another unit that was awarded the JMUA; nor has the applicant provided any documentation substantiating she was awarded a second JMUA. However, should the applicant provide documentation substantiating she was assigned to another unit receiving the JMUA, this Board would be willing to review the materials for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04003

    Original file (BC-2003-04003.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His discharge documents for the periods in question reflect he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, Air Force Commendation Medal, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Longevity Service Award Ribbon, with four Oak Leaf Clusters (4OLC), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (1 Silver OLC), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. However, should the applicant provide the above information or testimony from other former members of his unit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005-01641

    Original file (2005-01641.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01641 INDEX CODE: 107.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 NOV 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was not awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster, (3OLC) for the period 16 March...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01739

    Original file (BC-2005-01739.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFOSR-S and the AFOSR-L were authorized on 12 Oct 80, and awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve, and National Guard personnel who have been awarded credit for an OS tour after 1 Sep 80. In this regard, the AFOSR-S and the AFOSR-L were authorized on 12 Oct 80 for those members who had been credited with an OS tour after 1 Sep 80. The applicant did not complete an OS tour after that date.