RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03862
INDEX CODE: 108.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 JUNE 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be
corrected to reflect he was retired on the Temporary Disability Retired
List (TDRL) on 11 May 1961 or August 1962 rather than 11 December 1959.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires an adjustment of his service time from 11 December 1959 to 11
May 1961 or August 1962.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the time period in question, the applicant, who had prior service,
enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 October 1956 for a period of four
years.
AF Form 356, Proceedings and Findings of the Air Force Physical Evaluation
Board, dated 18 November 1959, indicates the applicant was diagnosed with
tuberculosis, pulmonary, active minimal, with tuberculosis of bone, left
second rib and tuberculosis of lymph nodes, and mediastinal. It was found
the extent of his disability was unfit and could be permanent. His
disability had a compensable rating of 100 percent.
AF Form 1180, Recommended Findings of Physical Evaluation Board, dated 18
November 1959, indicates the applicant was not physically fit for military
service; his disability was incurred while entitled to receive basic pay;
his disability was the proximate result of performance of military service;
his disability was not due to misconduct, neglect or incurred during a
period of unauthorized absence; and the disability was not incurred in
combat. On that date, the applicant concurred with the recommended
findings.
On 11 December 1959, the applicant was released from active duty and his
name was placed on the TDRL due to physical disability under the provisions
of Title 10 United States Code (USC) 1202. He served a total of three
years, two months, and seven days during this enlistment. His DD Form 214
reflects he served 7 years, 2 months, and 22 days of total active service.
On 26 May 1961, after a periodic examination, the Secretary of the Air
Force determined the applicant would be retained on the TDRL.
On 23 November 1962, AF Form 618, Medical Board Report, indicates the
applicant was diagnosed with tuberculosis, pulmonary, minimal, inactive
three years, off treatment one and a half years without residual lesion to
x-ray - date of origin 1959; tuberculosis, bone, left posterior second rib,
inactive three years, off treatment one and a half years without residual
lesion to x-ray - date of origin 1959; fracture, old, talus, (24 July 1962)
with union suggestion of possible subtalar incongruities and early
aseptonecrosis of the proximal talus - date of origin 1962; and nonunion
and displacement of fracture at the base of the fifth matatarsal - date of
origin 1962. The report further indicated the applicant was physically
qualified for general military service. His records were forwarded to the
PEB for further evaluation.
AF Form 188, Statement Relative to Re-Appointment or Reenlistment, dated 30
November 1962, indicates the applicant did not desire reenlistment in the
Regular Air Force.
On 21 January 1963, the Physical Review Council, considered all material
which was presented in regard to the reexamination of the applicant and
determined he was physically fit to perform the duties of his grade and the
diagnosis was no disease found (formerly tuberculosis, pulmonary). It was
recommended the applicant’s name be removed from the TDRL.
On 25 January 1963, the applicant was found physically fit to perform
active military service and was subsequently removed from the TDRL.
Special Order AB-1253, dated 23 January 1963, reflected the applicant was
removed from the TDRL and discharged in the grade of airman second class,
effective 31 January 1963.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommended denial indicating the applicant’s DD Form 214 cannot
be amended or changed to reflect he was retired at a later date. When a
member is removed from the TDRL, a new DD Form 214 is not issued. The
member receives a Special Order indicating his final status. That order
becomes a permanent part of his military personnel file, and can be
attached to his DD Form 214 reflecting his final disposition. To amend or
change his DD Form 214 would be in violation of Air Force Instructions and
is not authorized.
The evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the evaluation and indicated the DD Form 214 is a DD
Form 217 (Certificate) issued at the time of his transfer, not discharge.
This is one of the issues not addressed or considered. The other is his
creditable time for basic pay purposes. He states he is requesting total
net service time and his medical status before 31 January 1963.
The applicant’s response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD provided an additional evaluation and recommended denial. They
indicated the applicant’s DD Form 214 or DD Form 217AF (Certificate of
Service) cannot be amended or changed to reflect he was retired at a later
date. The DD Form 214 reflects active duty time. Time spent on the TDRL
is not creditable for active duty; therefore, when the applicant was
removed from the TDRL a new DD Form 214 was not issued. Rather, the
applicant received a Special Order indicating his final status. That order
becomes a permanent part of his military personnel file, and can be
attached to his DD Form 214 reflecting his final disposition. They
attached a copy of his Separation Order dated 23 January 1963. The DD Form
217AF (Certificate of Service), which is no longer in use, was also given
to reflect active duty service and cannot be changed. His request to amend
or change his DD Form 214 would be in violation of Air Force Instructions
and is not authorized.
The evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 4 March 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit G). As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been
the victim of an error or injustice. The Board notes time spent on the
TDRL is not creditable time towards active duty. When a member is removed
from the TDRL a new DD Form 214 is not issued. The member receives a
Special Order indicating final status, which becomes a permanent part of
the member’s military personnel record and in the applicant’s case he was
also given a DD Form 217AF (Certificate of Service), which reflects active
duty service. According to the applicant’s military personnel records he
was released from active service and his name was placed on the TDRL on 11
December 1959. On 25 January 1963, he was found physically fit to perform
active military service and his name was removed from the TDRL and he was
discharged on 31 January 1963. Therefore, in view of the foregoing and in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-
03862 in Executive Session on 21 April 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 December 2004, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 12 January 2005, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 January 2005.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 February 2005.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 28 February 2005,
w/atch.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 March 2005.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02083
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02083 INDEX CODE: 108.05 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 January 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus be reflected on his AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), dated 18 November...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01417
Therefore, the only issue to be considered by the Board is the applicant's request regarding his retirement date. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPD states the date shown on the applicant’s retirement certificate is the date he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his time on the TDRL should be credited as...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01420
He argues that the 100% disability rating assigned by the Army Retirement Board at the time of his retirement from the Army in 1945 should be equated to a 20- year length of service retirement and qualifies him for consideration in the program. The fact that he was disability retired with a 100% rating does not qualify him for compensation under the CRSC program. The applicant does not qualify for compensation under the CRSC program because he did not serve 20 years on active duty, he has...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02090
There is no evidence he had active tuberculosis and no evidence of lung damage from tuberculosis. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04134
He was placed in a special high altitude chamber for the purpose of diagnostic and corrective adjustment at an altitude of 65,000 feet for a minimum of 15 minutes with his suit inflated. There is no relationship of this incident or flying duties to the subsequent diagnosis of his lung tumor. The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit G. ODUSD(MPP)/Comp reviewed the applicant's request and concurs with the findings and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03328
In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal statement, a copy of DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and Permanent Retirement letter, and Department of the Air Force Special Order No. DPPD states that a review of the applicant’s military personnel and medical records reveals she was issued a DD Form 214, dated 4 August 1995, when she was placed on TDRL under AFI-36-3203. The DD Form 214...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02148
AF Form 1180, Recommended Findings of the Physical Evaluation Board (Modified Hearing), dated 18 September 1967, indicated the applicant concurred with the recommended findings On 25 September 1967, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the recommendation that the applicant be placed on the TDRL under the provisions of 10 USC 1202, effective 11 October 1967. Copies of his DD Form 214, Retirement Orders, dated 26 September 1967 and 16 November 1970, and DD Form 256AF, Honorable Discharge...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01345 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes A(JG 1 4 1998 APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The error committed by the Physjcal Evaluation Board (PEB) and the Physical Review Council (PRC) in 1963 be corrected and, instead of being separated with severance pay, his records show he had length of service of 20 years and was retired in the grade of master sergeant. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The PEB...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01161 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that she was honorably discharged rather than retired on Temporary Disability on 27 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01231
In his revised evaluation, the AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends a change in the records to show a 50% disability rating (60% less 10% for EPTS) at the time of placement on TDRL on 2 December 1959 and a 50% rating (60% less 10% for EPTS) at the time the applicant was permanently retired on 6 November 1962. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...