Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04173
Original file (BC-2003-04173.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-04173
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  service-connected  medical  conditions,  traumatic  arthritis  of   his
cervical and lumbar spine, arthritis of the knees, auditory  canal  disease,
hypertension, and gout, be assessed as combat related in  order  to  qualify
for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His conditions occurred while on active duty and training for the Cold  War,
Vietnam War, Grenada, and the Gulf War.  All of which are worldwide  crises.
 Each passing year his health worsens.

In support of his request, applicant provided a  copy  of  his  CRSC  denial
letter.  His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Data extracted from  the  available  military  records  indicates  that  the
applicant served in the Air National Guard.  He was  progressively  promoted
to the grade of chief master sergeant.  He voluntary retired from the on  30
Sep 99.  He served for 32 years, 9 months, and 16 days  of  which  20  years
and 28 days were active service.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 60% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 21 Nov 03 based upon the  fact  that
his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to  be  combat-
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states his  records  do  reflect  he  was
treated for the above conditions although they are not considered to be  the
result of combat related acts, instrumentality of war or  due  to  hazardous
service.  There is no record of any particular  injury  that  could  account
for the onset of his conditions other than the calf pain he developed  while
pushing a hay rake on 5 Sep 93 and pain  he  developed  on  his  feet  while
completing his walking exercise.  He reported heavy  and  hard  work  during
the service contributed to his disabilities.  heavy manual labor  is  not  a
combat related activity.  There is no documentation  that  his  disabilities
are  the  direct  result   of   armed   conflict,   hazardous   service   or
instrumentality of war, but rather are  the  results  of  normal  "wear  and
tear"  from  other  routine  causes/exposure,  or  his  particular  physical
makeup.  He was diagnosed and treated with medication for his  hypertension.
 He was overweight and was advised to lose the weight.  There is  no  record
of treatment of his auditory canal disease other  than  his  high  frequency
hearing loss noted on his physical examinations.  The DPPD evaluation is  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states form 1981 through 1985 he  was  assigned  to  a  unit  that
deployed for real was training.  The first 15 years of his  career  were  in
the National Guard.  As a technician he spent all of his time  training  for
a global was with the  Soviet  Union.   He  went  on  active  duty  in  1981
performing deployments to support real world exercises.   His  32  years  in
uniform were spent training to prepare  for  any  worldwide  conflict.   His
complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issues involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2003-
04173 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Dec 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 9 Mar 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Apr 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02309

    Original file (BC-2004-02309.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the medical "red flags" and Combat Medical Readiness Training sessions the conditions under which they were conducted simulated war and required both mental and physical stress. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02817

    Original file (BC-2004-02817.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 29 Dec 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Dec 04 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03204

    Original file (BC-2004-03204.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his traumatic arthritis, hypertension, and dermatophytosis are not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Nov 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03642

    Original file (BC-2003-03642.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit E. ODUSD(MPP)/Comp reviewed the applicant's request and concurs with the findings and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02251

    Original file (BC-2004-02251.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02251 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes, degenerative arthritis, hypertension, and pancretitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03843

    Original file (BC-2003-03843.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant states a review of his service medical records and personnel records finds no documentation or references to the incident he states caused his heart disease. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04056

    Original file (BC-2003-04056.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 30 Mar 67, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) hearing found that he was fit for duty at that time. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00250

    Original file (BC-2004-00250.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00250 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated Mandatory Case Completion Date: 30 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertensive heart disease, knee prosthesis, degenerative arthritis, and traumatic arthritis, be assessed as combat related in order to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2003-04145

    Original file (bc-2003-04145.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04145 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Jun 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertension and coronary disease, be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat-Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00324

    Original file (BC-2004-00324.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00324 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hemorrhage of the brain, dysarthia-drooling, loss of balance-dizziness, both knee conditions, back strain, and hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...