Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-02975
Original file (bc-2003-02975.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02975

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Leon Valley, Texas.
_________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His HOR is incorrect.

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a  wireless  telephone  bill
sent to his address in Leon Valley, Texas.

Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  20
July 1995.  DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document,  reflects  Ramah,
New Mexico, as his HOR.

EXAMINER'S NOTE:

HOR is defined as the place recorded as the home of the  individual  at  the
time they enlisted, were commissioned, or initially ordered to active  duty.
  It  is  recorded  in  the   military   personnel   record   to   determine
transportation entitlements upon separation.  The HOR can  be  changed  only
if there has been a break in serive of one full day (inactive  reserve  time
is not counted as a break in service) or a  bona  fide  error  was  made  in
recording the information given by the member.


_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an  error  or  injustice.   Applicant’s  contentions  are  duly
noted; however, he has provided no evidence that would lead  us  to  believe
the HOR currently reflected in his records was incorrectly recorded  at  the
time he was initially ordered to active duty.  Therefore, in the absence  of
evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  upon  which  to  recommend
favorable action on this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2003-02975
in Executive Session on 7 January 2004, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Albert F. Lowas Jr., Panel Chair
                       Ms. Martha Maust, Member
                       Mr. Mike Novel, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Sep 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.




                                   ALBERT F. LOWAS JR.
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01778

    Original file (BC-2003-01778.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no documentation to substantiate changing the applicant’s HOR. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the HOR currently reflected in his records was incorrectly recorded at the time he was initially ordered to active duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02975

    Original file (BC 2014 02975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant’s military personnel records failed to substantiate an error or injustice to warrant changing his HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy Of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00692

    Original file (BC-2004-00692.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 April 2004 for review and comment within 30 days. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his home of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02568A

    Original file (BC-2002-02568A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 April, AETC/DOF approved an additional 3.0 hours flying time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of the appeal, the majority of the Board remains unpersuaded that the applicant’s recommendation on the AETC Form 126A, dated 3 May 2002, Section III, Block 3, be changed from “should not be considered for reinstatement in this course at a later date” to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02085

    Original file (BC-2003-02085.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The court affirmed his conviction and sentence on 18 April 1994. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM reviewed the case and recommended denial. AFLSA/JAJMA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that while he was in Japan he did seek mental health help from the doctor at the mental health clinic in Misawa.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02203

    Original file (BC-2003-02203.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02203 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 4J (Entered into Phase I of the Air Force Weight Program, or the unit commander has declared the airman ineligible to reenlist for a period of Phase II or probation) be changed to a “3J”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02487

    Original file (BC-2003-02487.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02487 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from P O Box 1348 Provo, UT 84603-0000 to 4151 S. Sunrise Dr Saratoga Springs, UT 84043. DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, reflects P O Box 1348 Provo, UT 84603-0000, as his HOR. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03210

    Original file (BC-2003-03210.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03210 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Greensboro, NC, to Dallas, TX. However, the evidence provided does not convince us that the HOR currently reflected in her records was incorrectly recorded at the time she was initially ordered to active duty....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01011

    Original file (BC-2003-01011.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    She accepted and was honorably discharged from active duty and enlisted in the Rhode Island Air National Guard. As a full time deputy, she placed her law enforcement career as a priority over her weekend drill duties in the Guard. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02802

    Original file (BC-2003-02802.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records showed his HOR as U.S. Air Force Academy, CO. HOR is defined as the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time they enlisted, were commissioned, or initially ordered to active duty. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his home of record at the time of his entry on active duty was Eagle River, Alaska,...