Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02728
Original file (BC-2004-02728.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02728
                       INDEX CODE:  100.00

                       COUNSEL:  None

                       HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His Vietnam service was entered on his DD Form 214 as “No.”

Applicant's complete submission, with an attachment,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force  (RegAF)  on  10 March
1968 for a period of four years as  an  airman  basic  (AB).   He  was
progressively promoted to the rank of Sergeant (Sgt).

The  applicant  served  in  Okinawa  from  23  February  1969  through
22 August 1970.  He was honorably released from the  Air  Force  on  2
October 1972.  He served four years of active service.

On 17 September 2004, HQ AFPC/DPAPP requested the applicant to provide
any documentation he may have to support his contention to be credited
for service in Vietnam.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 states there is no  documentation  in  the  applicant’s
personnel records to reflect he served or was temporarily assigned  in
Vietnam.  They further state the applicant did not  respond  to  their
request to provide any
documentation to support his request.  They  recommend  the  requested
relief be denied.

A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
29 October 2004, for  review  and  response.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  The applicant’s contentions  are
duly noted, however,  he  has  submitted  no  persuasive  evidence  to
support these contentions.  Therefore, we agree with the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary  responsibility  and
adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant  has
not been the victim of either an error or an injustice.  There  is  no
evidence in the applicant’s personnel records indicating he was either
permanently or temporarily  assigned  in  Vietnam.   Furthermore,  the
applicant did not respond to the request  from  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility requesting he provide documentation  reflecting
he served in Vietnam.  Therefore, in the absence of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did   not
demonstrate the existence of material  error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a  personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-
2004-02728 in Executive Session on 16 and 27 December 2004,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Ms. Rita S. Looney, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
                       Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Aug 04, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 22 Oct Sep 04.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 04.




                                        RITA S. LOONEY
                                        Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02543

    Original file (BC-2004-02543.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02543 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect service in Vietnam. Copies of HQ AFPC/DPAPP’s letter and the applicant’s response are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01188

    Original file (BC-2004-01188.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01188 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). On 27 April 2004, HQ AFPC/DPAPP1 requested the applicant provide any documents to verify he was TDY in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01658

    Original file (BC-2004-01658.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 Oct 04, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP administratively corrected the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect she had 7 years and 1 month of active service (rather than 3 years, 9 months and 18 days) and her place of entry into active duty was Montgomery, AL. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF advised that AFI 36-2608 allows for the correction of the name after the fact for retirees if the name was legally changed and a copy of the document...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03674

    Original file (BC-2004-03674.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. DPAPP2 states there are no records in the applicant’s Military Personnel Records to verify he was TDY to Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03485

    Original file (BC-2004-03485.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served time in Vietnam and Thailand, but his records do not show his Vietnam time. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). We note the observations by the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicant’s PCS orders show he was diverted from Vietnam to Thailand and the Airman Performance Report written during the time frame confirms he was assigned to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02726

    Original file (BC-2004-02726.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 21 May 2001 be replaced with a reaccomplished report. While the majority has no reason to doubt the rater’s sincerity, the Board majority believes the rater’s initial statement that he intended for the report to have a negative connotation more accurately reflects his perception of the applicant’s performance during the contested time period. RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00059

    Original file (BC-2004-00059.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00059 INDEX NUMBER: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant submitted two applications requesting: His 2 May 02 Officer Performance Report (OPR) be corrected to reflect a Professional Military Education (PME) recommendation for Senior Service School (SSS). He be considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02048

    Original file (BC-2004-02048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on their review of the applicant’s complete military record, they did not locate any documentation verifying his entitlement to the requested awards. After reviewing the documentation submitted by the applicant with his rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, we have determined he does not meet the requirements for award of either the Air Force Recognition Ribbon (AFRR) or NCO PME Graduate Ribbon (NCOPMER).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03151

    Original file (BC-2004-03151.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03151 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The “4F” reenlistment eligibility (RE) code he received be changed to allow him to enlist in the Army. He received an RE code of “4F” which indicates the applicant had five or more days of lost time during enlistment. Regardless,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03458

    Original file (BC-2007-03458.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03458 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends the requested relief be denied. Exhibit...