RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01653
INDEX CODE 131.01, 110.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the
Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Below-the-Promotion-Zone (BPZ) Colonel
Central Selection Board with inclusion of his Officer Performance
Report (OPR) closing 30 Nov 02, and the previously awarded “Definitely
Promote (DP)” Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) from the National
Defense University (NDU) President, and the following corrections to
the CY02B Officer Selection Brief (OSB):
a. The Assignment History section include his assignments
as Chief of Staff/Senior Military Fellow, NDU, effective 14 Jun 02,
and Special Assistant to the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, OCJCS,
effective 1 Dec 02.
b. The Joint Reporting Category and Joint Duty History
sections indicate “Joint Staff.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His records had errors despite repeated efforts to correct them prior
to the CY02B board. Because the corrections were not accomplished by
HQ AFPC in time, his record failed to indicate he was promoted to NDU
Chief of Staff and was Special Assistant to the CJCS, and did not
include his 30 Nov 02 OPR from the NDU President. His duty history
remained inaccurate even though an NDU Dean and the Senior Special
Assistant to the CJCS called AFPC offering to fax/hand-carry papers
themselves to expedite corrections. Wrong records created an
inaccurate picture for the promotion board. He provides a timeline
pertaining to his move from NDU to his by-name move to the OCJCS.
Included is a supporting statement from the NDU President (the rater
of the missing OPR and the CY02B PRF senior rater), who confirms the
CJCS by-name request for the applicant in Oct 02 and the assignment
effective date as 1 Dec 02. The NDU President asserts he rated the
applicant his #1 of 14 selectively hired lieutenant colonels and gave
him his only “DP.” The Special Assistant to the CJCS asserts the
applicant’s record was incomplete without the 30 Nov 02 OPR, which was
completed, but not filed, in time for the board. He supports the
applicant’s request.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on extended active duty in the
grade of lieutenant colonel (colonel selectee).
He was considered BPZ, but not selected, for promotion to the grade of
colonel by the CY02B board, which convened on 3 Dec 02. The PRF
reflected an overall recommendation of “DP” and the senior rater’s
comment that the applicant was his #1 of 14 lieutenant colonels. The
applicant’s duty history on the CY02B OSB did not include his
assignment as Chief of Staff/Senior Military Fellow, NDU, effective 14
Jun 02, and as Special Assistant/CJCS, effective 1 Dec 02. The Joint
Reporting Category and Joint Duty History sections did not reflect
“Joint Staff.”
The 30 Nov 02 OPR was signed by the NDU President on 30 Nov 02;
however, the Air Force Advisor did not sign the OPR until 29 May 03,
five months after the CY02B Board had convened.
On 5 Jun 03, the applicant filed a similar appeal with the Evaluation
Reports Appeal Board (ERAB). The ERAB advised by letter, dated 14 Aug
03, that the 30 Nov 02 OPR was not required to be on file until
approximately 30 Jan 03, after the CY02B board, and suggested the
applicant file an appeal with the AFBFCMR.
The applicant was considered In-the-Promotion-Zone (IPZ) and selected
for promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY03B selection board,
which convened on 27 Oct 03. The CY03B OSB reflected the requested
data, and the PRF had an overall recommendation of “DP.” Pursuant to
an inquiry by the AFBCMR Staff, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO informally advised by
email they estimate the applicant may pin-on approximately 1 Jun 05.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPAO confirms the CY02B OSB contained erroneous duty history
information and provides a timeline showing AFPC processing events and
dates for the applicant’s requested move from NDU to JCS. They defer
SSB consideration to HQ AFPC/DPPPO.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPPO notes the rater did not indicate what efforts he made
after his signature on the OPR to ensure the report was expeditiously
processed and filed in the applicant’s selection record in time for
the board. AFI 36-2406 requires OPRs to be filed at HQ AFPC no later
than 60 days following the closeout of the report. The OPR was not
required to be on file until 30 Jan 03. Further, the Air Force
Advisor signed the report after the CY02B board. Granting SSB
consideration to include a report not required to be on file would
generate unfairness in the current promotion system. They recommend
SSB consideration based on the applicant’s assignment and joint duty
history errors on the CY02B OSB; however, the 30 Nov 02 OPR should not
be included.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant argues the crux of the AFPC argument against inclusion
of the 30 Nov 02 OPR is that AFPC was not “required” by the AFI to
include his OPR in the promotion folder because it was inside 60 days,
with a secondary argument that the CJCS needed 45 days’ notice for his
joint waiver. However, but for numerous administrative delays at many
levels, AFPC would have accepted and posted the OPR in time for the
board. If his assignment had been posted in the computer in a timely
manner, the duty title and OSB issue would be moot--AFPC may not be
required by instructions to include OPRs written within 60 days of the
board, but they are allowed, and in practice do, include OPRs and
other corrections within 60 days of a board. The events which led to
an incomplete promotion record meeting the CY02B board were certainly
not pure, and a corrected, complete promotion record should meet an
SSB for the sake of fairness and the intent of his very senior flag
supervisors. The applicant also provides a six-page point-by-point
discussion of the evaluations and the issues. He concludes that if
the assignment had been recorded correctly and in a timely manner, the
promotion board would have accepted the OPR. His supervisors believe
a corrected, complete promotion record, including one reflecting he
was Special Assistant to the CJCS and the 30 Nov 02 report, should
meet an SSB.
The Special Assistant to the JCS Chairman (the applicant’s present
rater) indicates in her statement that her predecessor made her aware
of the applicant’s promotion record problem. She asserts the
applicant’s senior raters intended the 30 Nov 02 OPR to be included in
his CY02B selection record. She strongly urges the Board to grant SSB
consideration with this report included in the applicant’s record.
A complete copy of applicant’s response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice warranting SSB consideration for
the CY02B selection board with a corrected OSB and the inclusion of
the 30 Nov 02 OPR. As acknowledged by HQ AFPC, the applicant’s CY02B
OSB clearly omitted significant duty history information. Further,
the supporting statements provided by the applicant assert the missing
OPR was completed in time for the selection board’s review but
administrative delays prevented its inclusion in the applicant’s
selection folder. We find no basis to question the integrity and
intentions of the NDU president and the Special Assistants to the
CJCS. Since the applicant’s promotion opportunities may have been
adversely impacted by these errors, we recommend his records be
corrected as indicated below and he be afforded SSB consideration.
The applicant should know that, unless he raises some subsequent
objection, standard operating procedures would use the same
“Definitely Promote” PRF considered by the CY02B board for the SSB.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The date in Section IX of the Field Grade Officer
Performance Report, AF Form 707A, closing 30 November 2002, be changed
from “29 May 2003” to “1 December 2002.”
b. The Officer Selection Brief for the Calendar Year 2002B
(CY02B) Colonel Central Selection Board reflect in the Assignment
History section his assignments as Chief of Staff/Senior Military
Fellow, NDU, effective 14 June 2002, and Special Assistant to the
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, OCJCS, effective 1 December 2002; and
include “Joint Staff” in the Joint Reporting Category and Joint Duty
History sections.
It is further recommended that his records, to include the OPR closing
30 November 2002, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel
by a Special Selection Board for the CY02B Colonel Central Selection
Board.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 4 November 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-01653 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Apr 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAO, dated 24 Jun 04, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, dated 15 Sep 04, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Oct 04, w/atchs.
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-01653
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. The date in Section IX of the Field Grade Officer
Performance Report, AF Form 707A, closing 30 November 2002, be changed
from “29 May 2003” to “1 December 2002.”
b. The Officer Selection Brief for the Calendar Year 2002B
(CY02B) Colonel Central Selection Board reflect in the Assignment
History section his assignments as Chief of Staff/Senior Military
Fellow, NDU, effective 14 June 2002, and Special Assistant to the
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, OCJCS, effective 1 December 2002; and
include “Joint Staff” in the Joint Reporting Category and Joint Duty
History sections.
It is further directed that his records, to include the OPR
closing 30 November 2002, be considered for promotion to the grade of
colonel by a Special Selection Board for the CY02B Colonel Central
Selection Board.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389
His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00941
A review of the applicant’s personnel record confirms both the Air Force and the Joint Staff’s systems of record were updated to reflect appropriate joint duty credit at the time the promotion board convened. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant asserts that nowhere in the referenced CJCSI does it say that joint duty history will not be reflected on an...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03306
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03306 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) be declared void and replaced with the reaccomplished PRF provided and he be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB)...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03653
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03653 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 20 Dec 01 through 5 Sep 02 be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished OPR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02883 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Professional Military Education (PME) recommendations on his Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 19 Mar 94 and 25 Nov 94, be changed from Intermediate Service School (ISS) to Senior Service School (SSS). The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00459
In regards to the applicant’s request to change the DAFSC on his PRF viewed by the CY02B Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board, they note that while it was appropriate for the ERAB to correct the applicant’s DAFSC on his OPR, it is not appropriate to make changes to the PRF. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant...
By letter, dated 19 Nov 01, AFPC/DPPPOC notified the applicant that, in response to his 29 Aug 01 application for correction of his military records, they were granting his request for SSB consideration which will consider his record for the CY98A (9 Nov 98), CY99A (8 Nov 99), and CY00A (6 Nov 00) Central Colonel Selection Boards, to include a correction to his 9 Jan 98 duty history entry and missing AFCM (1OLC) on his OSB for those boards. A complete copy of the DPPPO evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00312
His Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to include his Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), for the period 15 April 1997 to 30 December 1999, and AF Form 77, Supplemental Evaluation Sheet, dated 15 May 1989. The Overall Recommendation of his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) rendered for the P0502B selection board be changed from a “Promote” to a “Definitely Promote.” 4. The HQ AFPC/DPPPEP evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02191
In support of his request, applicant provided emails to/from his senior rater, a statement from the senior rater, an email from the HQ AFPC nonselection counselor, drafts of the OPR, and his previous appeals to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB). Col B-- was the senior rater of the CY01B PRF and the contested CY02B PRF, as well as the rater of the contested 16 Feb 02 OPR. He provided nothing documenting Col B-- directed him to complete his own PRF or OPR.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00225
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-00225 IDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Assignment History section of his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reflect a command level of “NAF” versus “DD/J” for the 23 Dec 97 entry, and the 30 Nov 99 entry be removed in its entirety. A complete copy of the evaluation is at...