RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00953
INDEX CODE: 137.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan
(SBP) coverage for his current spouse.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is being forced to pay SBP coverage for his current spouse, although
they both stated they did not want the coverage.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement
cosigned by his spouse. The applicant's complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired on 1 May 1968. He and his former spouse were married
on 6 July 1951. Member elected spouse only SBP coverage based on full-
retired pay during open enrollment. The parties’ divorce was finalized on
21 November 2002; however, the divorce decree did not address the SBP. The
applicant remarried on 24 January 2003, and in April 2003 he notified the
finance center of his divorce and remarriage.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPTR states that SBP spouse coverage is suspended when the spouse
loses eligibility. Public Law allows a retiree to elect not to resume
coverage for a subsequently acquired spouse; however, the new spouse will
be covered at the previous level on the first anniversary of the marriage
if the member takes no action before that date. Premiums for the
automatically reinstated coverage become effective the first day of the
thirteenth month and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS-CL)
will computer the retroactive costs when evidence of the remarriage becomes
a matter of record.
DPPTR can neither confirm nor deny that the member properly advised DFAS
that he did not want SPB coverage for his wife. However, DFAS-CL received
his request not to add his wife to the Plan less than one month after the
one-year time limit. He submitted this request for corrective action in a
timely manner after being notified that coverage had been established on
behalf of his current spouse.
The finance center suspended his spouse SBP coverage and refunded premiums
paid retroactive to his divorce. There is no evidence that the member
submitted a request not to participate in the SBP until twenty-five days
after the first anniversary of his marriage. The member’s wife has
provided a notarized statement concurring in his request to decline
coverage and waiver her eligibility to receive approximately $394 monthly
in the event of his death. A debt of approximately $240 has accumulated to
date of DPPTR’s evaluation.
DPPTR states that in the past, relief has been granted in such cases based
upon authority under Title 10 Section 1454 to correct “administrative
errors.” However, based on a 7 August 2003 JAA memorandum, DPPTR
recommends denial of the applicant’s request. A complete copy of the
evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for
review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice. The evidence indicates the applicant notified
DFAS of his divorce and remarriage well within the required one-year
statutory period. The Board majority is persuaded that it was his intent
that the coverage under the SBP be terminated at that time. Based on
evidence provided by the applicant, it appears he wrongfully assumed he was
not required to elect “not” to resume coverage for his current spouse. He
has provided signed statements from his current spouse that corroborate his
claim of his intention, and her agreement, not to reelect SBP coverage for
his current spouse. In view of the above and the applicant’s expeditious
action to resolve this matter within a short period of time after the 12-
month period had expired, the Board majority believes that the applicant
has been a victim of an injustice and that approval of the requested relief
is warranted.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 January 2004, he elected not
to resume Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse coverage, and his spouse
concurred with his decision.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 20 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Mr. Mike J. Novel, Member
By majority vote, the Board recommended granting the requested relief. Mr.
Roj voted to deny the application but does not desire to submit a Minority
Report. The following documentary evidence was considered with AFBCMR BC-
2004-00953:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 2003, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 23 Apr 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Apr 04.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-00953
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 23 January 2004, he
elected not to resume Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse coverage, and his
spouse, XXXXX, concurred with his decision.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01220 INDEX CODE 137.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for termination of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) before the first anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00769
He remarried on 14 September 1985 and, in October 1985 he submitted a valid request to DFAS to establish former spouse coverage under the insurable interest option. His former spouse remarried in 2003 and applicant, in his appeal to this Board, requests that the beneficiary eligibility of his former spouse to his SBP be deleted and his current spouse be named beneficiary. Although the separation agreement and divorce decree stated that he only had to retain coverage until his former spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03448
Issues of the Afterburner are mailed to the correspondence address each retiree provides to the finance center. It is each member’s responsibility to notify DFAS-CL of their current correspondence address, regardless of their pay status. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03448 in Executive Session on 21 January 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. David C. VanGasbeck,Panel Chair Ms....
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00998
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The member was married at the time of his retirement on 1 Jul 71. Other than his own assertions, we find no evidence has been presented to show the applicant submitted a valid request to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service-Denver Center to establish survivor coverage for his spouse within the first year of their marriage. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01653
His third marriage was on 14 Jun 95, but he failed to submit a request to not extend SBP coverage to his third wife before the first anniversary of their marriage; therefore, his third spouse became the eligible spouse beneficiary on 14 Jun 96. Public Law (PL) 99-145 provides a one-year period during which SBP participants with suspended spouse coverage who remarry may choose to not extend SBP protection to the newly acquired spouse. While the applicant acted in a timely manner to notify...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00401
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states that a participant’s spouse automatically becomes an eligible beneficiary on the first anniversary of the marriage unless, before that date, a valid election to not resume the coverage under the provisions of PL 99-145 is sent to the finance center. The applicant submitted a valid request to reinstate SBP coverage on R--- ’s behalf within the time permitted, changed his mind about...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02424
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02424
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00858
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time he completed the form he had been divorced since 1984. Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. In 1990, the applicant remarried; however, the applicant did not request any changes to the RCSBP coverage within a year of the marriage, as required by law.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03233
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Counsel states that, prior to the former member’s retirement from the Air Force, he elected SBP coverage for “spouse and child.” On 29 December 1983, the member and applicant divorced and their divorce decree incorporated a settlement agreement wherein the applicant would receive “all (100%) of the Husband’s Survivor benefits that can be paid to a former spouse.” The Defense Finance and Accounting...