Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00953
Original file (BC-2004-00953.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00953
            INDEX CODE:  137.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show that  he  declined  Survivor  Benefit  Plan
(SBP) coverage for his current spouse.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is being forced to pay SBP coverage  for  his  current  spouse,  although
they both stated they did not want the coverage.

In support of his  request,  the  applicant  submits  a  personal  statement
cosigned  by  his  spouse.   The  applicant's  complete   submission,   with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant retired on 1 May 1968.  He and his former spouse were  married
on 6 July 1951.  Member elected spouse only  SBP  coverage  based  on  full-
retired pay during open enrollment.  The parties’ divorce was  finalized  on
21 November 2002; however, the divorce decree did not address the SBP.   The
applicant remarried on 24 January 2003, and in April 2003  he  notified  the
finance center of his divorce and remarriage.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPTR states that SBP spouse coverage is suspended when  the  spouse
loses eligibility.  Public Law allows a  retiree  to  elect  not  to  resume
coverage for a subsequently acquired spouse; however, the  new  spouse  will
be covered at the previous level on the first anniversary  of  the  marriage
if  the  member  takes  no  action  before  that  date.   Premiums  for  the
automatically reinstated coverage become effective  the  first  day  of  the
thirteenth month and the Defense Finance and  Accounting  Service  (DFAS-CL)
will computer the retroactive costs when evidence of the remarriage  becomes
a matter of record.

DPPTR can neither confirm nor deny that the  member  properly  advised  DFAS
that he did not want SPB coverage for his wife.  However,  DFAS-CL  received
his request not to add his wife to the Plan less than one  month  after  the
one-year time limit.  He submitted this request for corrective action  in  a
timely manner after being notified that coverage  had  been  established  on
behalf of his current spouse.

The finance center suspended his spouse SBP coverage and  refunded  premiums
paid retroactive to his divorce.  There  is  no  evidence  that  the  member
submitted a request not to participate in the  SBP  until  twenty-five  days
after the  first  anniversary  of  his  marriage.   The  member’s  wife  has
provided  a  notarized  statement  concurring  in  his  request  to  decline
coverage and waiver her eligibility to receive  approximately  $394  monthly
in the event of his death.  A debt of approximately $240 has accumulated  to
date of DPPTR’s evaluation.

DPPTR states that in the past, relief has been granted in such  cases  based
upon authority under  Title  10  Section  1454  to  correct  “administrative
errors.”   However,  based  on  a  7  August  2003  JAA  memorandum,   DPPTR
recommends denial of the  applicant’s  request.   A  complete  copy  of  the
evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force  Evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  for
review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this  date,  this  office  has
received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an injustice.  The evidence indicates  the  applicant  notified
DFAS of his  divorce  and  remarriage  well  within  the  required  one-year
statutory period.  The Board majority is persuaded that it  was  his  intent
that the coverage under the SBP  be  terminated  at  that  time.   Based  on
evidence provided by the applicant, it appears he wrongfully assumed he  was
not required to elect “not” to resume coverage for his current  spouse.   He
has provided signed statements from his current spouse that corroborate  his
claim of his intention, and her agreement, not to reelect SBP  coverage  for
his current spouse.  In view of the above and  the  applicant’s  expeditious
action to resolve this matter within a short period of time  after  the  12-
month period had expired, the Board majority  believes  that  the  applicant
has been a victim of an injustice and that approval of the requested  relief
is warranted.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 January 2004,  he  elected  not
to resume Survivor Benefit  Plan  (SBP)  spouse  coverage,  and  his  spouse
concurred with his decision.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 20 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
            Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
            Mr. Mike J. Novel, Member

By majority vote, the Board recommended granting the requested relief.   Mr.
Roj voted to deny the application but does not desire to submit  a  Minority
Report.  The following documentary evidence was considered with  AFBCMR  BC-
2004-00953:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 2003, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 23 Apr 04, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Apr 04.




      ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
      Panel Chair


AFBCMR BC-2004-00953




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 23 January 2004, he
elected not to resume Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse coverage, and his
spouse, XXXXX, concurred with his decision.




            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201220

    Original file (0201220.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01220 INDEX CODE 137.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for termination of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) before the first anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00769

    Original file (BC-2004-00769.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He remarried on 14 September 1985 and, in October 1985 he submitted a valid request to DFAS to establish former spouse coverage under the insurable interest option. His former spouse remarried in 2003 and applicant, in his appeal to this Board, requests that the beneficiary eligibility of his former spouse to his SBP be deleted and his current spouse be named beneficiary. Although the separation agreement and divorce decree stated that he only had to retain coverage until his former spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03448

    Original file (BC-2002-03448.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues of the Afterburner are mailed to the correspondence address each retiree provides to the finance center. It is each member’s responsibility to notify DFAS-CL of their current correspondence address, regardless of their pay status. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03448 in Executive Session on 21 January 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. David C. VanGasbeck,Panel Chair Ms....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00998

    Original file (BC-2004-00998.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The member was married at the time of his retirement on 1 Jul 71. Other than his own assertions, we find no evidence has been presented to show the applicant submitted a valid request to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service-Denver Center to establish survivor coverage for his spouse within the first year of their marriage. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01653

    Original file (BC-2003-01653.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His third marriage was on 14 Jun 95, but he failed to submit a request to not extend SBP coverage to his third wife before the first anniversary of their marriage; therefore, his third spouse became the eligible spouse beneficiary on 14 Jun 96. Public Law (PL) 99-145 provides a one-year period during which SBP participants with suspended spouse coverage who remarry may choose to not extend SBP protection to the newly acquired spouse. While the applicant acted in a timely manner to notify...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00401

    Original file (BC-2003-00401.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states that a participant’s spouse automatically becomes an eligible beneficiary on the first anniversary of the marriage unless, before that date, a valid election to not resume the coverage under the provisions of PL 99-145 is sent to the finance center. The applicant submitted a valid request to reinstate SBP coverage on R--- ’s behalf within the time permitted, changed his mind about...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02424

    Original file (BC-2002-02424.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02424

    Original file (BC-2002-02424.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00858

    Original file (BC-2003-00858.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time he completed the form he had been divorced since 1984. Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. In 1990, the applicant remarried; however, the applicant did not request any changes to the RCSBP coverage within a year of the marriage, as required by law.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03233

    Original file (BC-2003-03233.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Counsel states that, prior to the former member’s retirement from the Air Force, he elected SBP coverage for “spouse and child.” On 29 December 1983, the member and applicant divorced and their divorce decree incorporated a settlement agreement wherein the applicant would receive “all (100%) of the Husband’s Survivor benefits that can be paid to a former spouse.” The Defense Finance and Accounting...