Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00684
Original file (BC-2004-00684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00684
            INDEX CODE:

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be entitled to apply  for  retraining  and  reassignment  prior  to
completing 36 months of service as a four-year prior-service enlistee.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was honorably discharged from the military on  21  July  2003.   He
came back into the military and had to go through  a  retraining  list
because he could not go back to  his  old  Air  Force  Specialty  Code
(AFSC).  He wanted to retrain to another AFSC, so it  did  not  bother
him.  Once he was back in, his recruiter told him that he  had  to  go
back to his old AFSC.  He was also told he could always  retrain  once
he got to his duty station.  His duty station told him  he  could  not
retrain for 36 months, which he was not aware of from his paperwork.

Applicant did not provide any documentation in support of the  appeal.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 July  1999  and  was
released from active duty on 20 July 2003.  He served a total of  four
years on active duty.  On 18 November 2003, he enlisted in the Regular
Air Force in the  grade  of  senior  airman  (E-4)  as  prior  service
enlistee in the supply management (2S051) career field for a period of
four years.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial.  The applicant’s retraining options were
determined in accordance with governing directives.  His initials  and
signature  on  the  AF  Form  3006,  Enlistment  Agreement   -   Prior
Service/Active  USAFR/ANG  United  States  Air  Force,  confirmed   he
understood the retraining window.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 26 March 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within  30  days.   As  of  this
date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  the  conclusion  that  the
applicant has not been the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.   As
stated, his initials and signature on the AF Form  3006  confirmed  he
understood the  retraining  window.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, the applicant’s  request  is  not  favorably
considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 27 May 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
                       Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in  connection  with
AFBCMR Docket No. BC-2004-00684:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 03.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 19 Mar 04.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 04.




                             GREGORY H. PETKOFF
                             Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00609

    Original file (BC-2005-00609.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPAE states the applicant is not eligible to receive the SRB that was in effect when he was approved for retraining because he did not reenlist within 30 days of the notice of termination of the SRB for that career field. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he never received official notification of the requirement to reenlist within 30 days of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03397

    Original file (BC-2004-03397.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He graduated from technical training school on 7 April 2004, and after inquiring about reenlisting, was informed the rules had changed and he was not eligible to reenlist, because he was not within three months of his date of separation (DOS). His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E _________________________________________________________________ ADDITONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAA reviewed a similar application and provided an advisory which indicates in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03744

    Original file (BC-2004-03744.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03744 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a constructive reenlistment effective 1 March 2004 for 4 years and 13 months and that he be authorized a Zone B, multiple 2.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for four years. IAW AFI 36-2606 (Reenlistment in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03558

    Original file (BC-2004-03558.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not notified of the change in policy of his SRB, and was miscounseled concerning whether or not he was eligible to reenlist immediately after school. In accordance with the governing instruction, AFI 36-2606, (Reenlistment in the United States Air Force) applicant had to reenlist within 30 days of class graduation date to receive the SRB that was in effect as of the date he was approved for retraining (31 July 2003). Applicant was not eligible to reenlist and receive an SRB...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00311

    Original file (BC-2005-00311.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPAE recommends a constructive reenlistment be authorized on the applicant effective 1 October 2003, for 4 years and 7 months, as he should have reenlisted upon approval of the retraining. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 30 September 2003, rather than 22 March 2005, and reenlisted in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00623

    Original file (BC-2003-00623.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has never received an SRB even though he has reenlisted two times, extended once, and served for nearly 10 years. A “Zone B” SRB is a bonus for members having over six but less than 10 years of total active federal military service and whose AFSC has been authorized to receive a bonus. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02331

    Original file (BC-2004-02331.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His reenlistment contract shows he was eligible to receive a Zone A, Multiple 4 SRB based on 4 years of service. However, based on the evidence of record, the Board majority is not persuaded that the applicant has been a victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC2006-03798

    Original file (BC2006-03798.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03798 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 JUNE 2008 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of “4F” be changed to a code that allows him to enlist in the US Coast Guard. Normally, members selected for reenlistment but failing to rank high enough...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802

    Original file (BC-2005-03802.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00579

    Original file (BC-2004-00579.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00579 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive payment of his Initial Enlistment Bonus (IEB) in the amount of $7,000.00. This applicant was not authorized to receive this bonus and furthermore it was a bonus that was authorized with a six-year enlistment only. ...