RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00130
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge effective 1 December 2002 be changed to a retirement.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He originally intended to retire effective 1 December 2001; however, he
extended his enlistment for 12 months and fulfilled his extension on 30
November 2002.
The applicant provided no evidence in support of his appeal. The
applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 October 1981 at the
age of 18 for a period of four years in the grade of Airman Basic (E-1).
According to the military personnel data system, he was progressively
promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) effective and with a date
of rank of 1 August 2001. On 1 November 2001, the applicant requested a 12-
month extension to his current enlistment on Air Force Form 1411, Extension
or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air
Force Reserve. On the AF Form 1411, the applicant indicated the purpose
for his extension request was to retire the first day of the month
following his high year of tenure date. The Air Force Personnel Center
initiated a request on 17 October 2003 to separate the applicant when it
was discovered he did not request retirement prior to his expiration of
term of service on 30 November 2002. On 22 October 2003, an Air Force Form
100, Request and Authorization for Separation, was issued to separate the
applicant effective 30 November 2002. The applicant was honorably
discharged effective 30 November 2002 for completion of active service.
The applicant was not available for signature. He had served 21 years, 1
month, and 26 days on active duty.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states that the applicant’s separation
was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation. The applicant separated upon completion of his
enlistment and moved to the Philippines, failing to initiate any action to
apply for retirement, even though he was retirement eligible. Section
8914, Title 10 United States Code, specifically states, “Under regulations
to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force, an enlisted member of
the Air Force who has at least 20, but less than 30, years of service
computed under section 8925 of this title may, upon his request, be
retired.” At the time of his departure in September 2002, the applicant
was not issued a DD Form 214 or a retirement order. DPPRS states the
applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices
that occurred in the discharge processing. The DPPRS evaluation is at
Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends denial. DPPRRP states an Air Force member must
request retirement. There is no indication in the applicant’s record that
he requested retirement on an AF Form 1160, Military Retirement Actions,
nor did he receive retirement briefings and out-processing from the
Military Personnel Flight as required by Air Force Instruction 36-3203,
Service Retirements. Indicating an intention to retire while executing an
extension is not considered a request to retire. DPPRRP states the
applicant did not provide any evidence to show that he requested
retirement; therefore, they recommend denial of the applicant’s request.
The DPPRRP evaluation is at Exhibit D.
ARPC/DPPTR indicates that if the Board’s decision is to approve the
applicant’s request for service retirement, Survivor Benefit Plan coverage
will be automatically established for all eligible beneficiaries by
operation of the law retroactive to the effective date of retirement.
Should the applicant disagree with the coverage established, he may submit
a formal request to correct the record. The DPPTR advisory is at Exhibit
E.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force Evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 12
March 2004, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The evidence of record supports the
fact that the applicant did not request retirement on an Air Force Form
1160 as required; even though his 12-month extension indicates his
intentions were to retire effective 1 December 2002. We are not sure as to
what sequence of events interrupted the applicant’s retirement process;
however, we note that he is eligible for and entitled to retirement. Even
though there is no evidence of miscounseling, we feel that the applicant’s
servicing personnel office is at least partially at fault for the oversight
that occurred through a lack of guidance and/or follow-up. In any event,
we feel he has suffered an error or injustice that should be rectified in
favor of the applicant. In view of the foregoing, it is our opinion that
the applicant’s records should be corrected as indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was not discharged under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208 on 30 November 2002, but on that date he was
released from active duty and voluntarily retired effective 1 December
2002, under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 8914.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 11 May 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Member
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-00130 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Oct 03.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd 3 Feb 04, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dtd 5 Feb 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 4 Mar 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Mar 04.
JOHN L. ROBUCK
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-00130
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
Invitational travel orders be issued by competent authority to
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that he was not discharged under
the provisions of AFI 36-3208 on 30 November 2002, but on that date he was
released from active duty and voluntarily retired effective 1 December
2002, under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 8914.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01083
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He honored his commitment to the Air Force by serving for 23 years and asks that the Air Force (AF) honor it’s commitment to his service by entitling him and his family to an active duty retirement. He was honorably discharged effective 23 October 1999 for completion of required active service after serving 24 years and 8 days. Counsel was notified by the Wing JA that the applicant and his military...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03857
The applicant married and had an eligible child when he retired from military service on 1 November 2004, but he did not complete the documents necessary to properly establish his retired pay account (including an SBP election) until after his retirement date. DPFF states AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, note below para 10.9.7 states, in part, a member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. DPPRRP notes upon his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01698
On 25 September 1974, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of sergeant (E-4) for a period of 4 years. On 4 June 1987, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant he was considering the imposition of nonjudicial punishment on him under Article 15, UCMJ for wrongful use of marijuana on or about 13 April 1987. On 23 September 1987, after consulting legal counsel, applicant submitted a conditional waiver of the rights associated with an administrative discharge...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS reviewed applicant's request and recommends denial. DPPRRP states that the applicant, a prior service master...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02675
DPPRRP states in part, time spent on the TDRL does not count as active service for retirement, even though a member may be later found to be fit for duty by a Physical Evaluation Board and returned to active duty. The DPPRRP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 Oct 06, for review and comment within...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00412
However, the BOI found he had committed the other offenses and recommended the applicant receive a general discharge from the Air Force. He had seven days time lost due to civilian confinement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommends the applicant’s requests be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00398
He had completed a total of 21 years and 7 months of active service for retirement. At the time of the applicant’s requested retirement date, the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) authorized, effective 6 May 2004, a reduction of the three-year TIG requirement for lieutenant colonels to retire in grade with no less than two-years TIG and delegated approval/disapproval authority to HQ AFPC/DPPR. Under the HQ USAF/DP message, the applicant was not authorized to request a later retirement date...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-01151
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01151 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: ANTHONY W. WALLUK XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a 20-year active duty retirement in the grade of master sergeant (E-7) effective June 1996. The applicant’s file contains a request from...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant did not provide any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. They recommend the request be denied (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03565
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03565 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 MAY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be changed to an honorable discharge with retirement or his rank of staff sergeant (E-5) be reinstated. In support of his request, the applicant...