Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04304
Original file (BC-2003-04304.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBERS:  BC-2003-04304
            INDEX CODE 107.00
            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for a gunshot wound  sustained  on
5 Aug 51.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was shot on 5 Aug 51 but there is no mention of this on his DD Form
214. A PH will give him a discount on his prescription drugs.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.


_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Some of the applicant’s military records apparently were destroyed  in
the 1973 fire at the National Personnel  Records  Center  (NPRC).  The
following information was extracted from the available records.

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 May 50  and  was
promoted to airman first class on 1 Apr 53.

On 5 Aug 51, while waiting in the midnight mess line at Carswell  AFB,
TX, the applicant was shot in the left foot when an individual who was
cleaning a .45 caliber pistol accidentally discharged the weapon.  The
applicant was hospitalized for two months for a fractured foot.

The applicant was honorably discharged in the grade  of  airman  first
class on 28 May 54 for expiration of term of service after four  years
of active service.  The discharge physical  noted  the  scars  on  the
applicant’s left foot as a result of the 5 Aug 51 gunshot wound.

The applicant filed a claim with the Department  of  Veterans  Affairs
(DVA) for service-connected compensation for the gunshot wound to  his
left foot. However, on 29 Oct 03, his request was denied.

On 19 Feb 04, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant he was not eligible
for the PH because the wound was the result  of  an  accident,  not  a
direct result of enemy action, and he was at Carswell AFB,  TX,  which
was not a combat zone.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR advises that, to be awarded the PH, an  injury  must  be
the direct result of enemy action and require medical  treatment.  The
applicant’s wound was clearly the result of an accident and he was not
in a combat zone.  Since this was an accident, the  applicant  is  not
eligible for the PH and his request should be denied.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 23 Apr 04 for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough  review  of  the
evidence  of  record  and  the  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded he should be awarded the PH. The  applicant  was  not  in  a
combat zone at the time of the accident, which  occurred  at  Carswell
AFB, TX. He was not wounded as a direct result of  enemy  action,  but
was shot in the foot by an accidentally discharged .45 side arm  while
standing  in  the  mess  hall  line.  We  therefore  agree  with   the
recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed  as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has  not  sustained  his
burden of
having suffered either an error or an injustice. In view of the  above
and absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 18 May 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Panel Chair
                 Mr. Charlie E. Williams, Jr., Member
                 Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member

The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-04304 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Nov 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 16 Apr 04, w/atch.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Apr 04.




                                   ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR.
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201338

    Original file (0201338.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01338 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received while saving the life of a young officer. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00788

    Original file (BC-2005-00788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this respect, we note that the Purple Heart (PH) is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions that required or received treatment by medical personnel. The applicant contends that his wounds were received in action; however, an entry in the his medical records indicates that on 8 December 1943, he was treated for a gunshot wound to his right leg that was incurred when he was accidentally shot by an Italian soldier. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200662

    Original file (0200662.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 May 02, they informed the applicant that he had not provided the necessary details regarding his broken leg, no medical documentation of a broken leg or hospitalization could be found, and that he had not explained or provided any documents showing that he had been wounded or injured as a direct result of enemy action. They provided applicant a copy of the Purple Heart Criteria, and asked him to provide the necessary documents or withdraw his claim. A complete copy of the evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00818

    Original file (BC-2004-00818.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00818 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). As a result of the injury, his second and third toes of his right foot were amputated. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03708

    Original file (BC-2003-03708.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPPR states that there is medical documentation pertaining to the injury received; however, there is no evidence in the record showing the injury was the result of enemy action. However, he has provided no evidence to indicate that the injury he sustained was the direct result of enemy action. After a review of his personnel and medical records, to include a September 1997 Veterans Administration Rating which indicates service-connected disability for his gunshot wound, the evidence does...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00705

    Original file (BC-2005-00705.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his application for extended active duty, he indicated he was hospitalized after being shot down in the North Sea and later rescued from a rubber life boat, and that he was suspended from all flying duty as a result of this and subsequent combat experiences. On his fifth mission, the pilot ditched the plane at sea after it was severely shot up. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR reports that they researched the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02690

    Original file (BC-2002-02690.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request applicant submits a copy of a certificate from a Legal Officer, dated 3 Sep 45 and the Bronze Star citation, and honorable discharge, statements from the VA, medical records and a letter from the Department of the Army Review Board. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Nov 02, for review and comment. We noted the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00812

    Original file (BC-2004-00812.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his military record reveals insufficient medical documentation to substantiate his claim that he received any injury as a direct result of enemy action. Extensive research would be needed to determine if the incident is recorded in the daily unit records or with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 9 and 20...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02262

    Original file (BC-2006-02262.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 600-45, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against the enemy or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided the wound necessitated treatment by medical personnel. The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB), on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, has the authority to determine a veteran’s entitlement to the PH. The PH is awarded for injuries received as a direct result of enemy action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02904

    Original file (BC-2003-02904.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02904 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received at Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam. Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. He medical records showed he had broke his foot in 1969 at Dyess AFB, TX, when he slipped and fell...