Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02158A
Original file (BC-2003-02158A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02158

                                             COUNSEL:  None

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  Not
Indicated

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In his appeal for reconsideration, the applicant asks  that  his  1975
general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 Jun 66 and served
as a squadron helicopter mechanic. After three years and ten months of
active service, he was honorably released from active duty on 7 Apr 70
and transferred to the Reserves. He  reenlisted  in  the  Regular  Air
Force on 16 Jun 71 and was promoted to the grade of sergeant on 21 Jun
71.

The applicant began to experience depression brought about by  marital
and financial difficulties and  the  loss  of  his  career  field.  He
attempted to obtain  a  hardship  discharge;  however,  the  available
records did  not  indicate  why  this  was  not  granted  despite  the
recommendations of a physician and a social worker. During an  initial
flight physical, the applicant revealed  intravenous  amphetamine  use
prior to reenlisting  and  amphetamine  use  two  months  before.  The
records  contained   no   additional   documentation   regarding   the
amphetamine use and/or a Mental Health Clinic determination  regarding
drug abuse.

The applicant began a series of  absences  without  leave  (AWOL).  He
received three Article 15s and two  Letters  of  Reprimand  (LOR)  for
these episodes, as well as for indebtedness and tardiness.

The commander recommended the applicant for general  discharge.  Legal
review noted that the only rehabilitative efforts were those  inherent
in  the  imposition  of  nonjudicial  punishment  and   administrative
reprimands and there appeared to be a lack of concern  for  counseling
regarding whatever problems the applicant may have been  experiencing.
However, since the rehabilitation effort met the minimum standard, the
staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient.

The applicant was separated in the grade  of  airman  with  a  general
discharge on 28 Apr 75 after a total of 7 years, 7 months and 26  days
of active service. He had 18 days of lost time.

The applicant appealed for an upgraded discharge in  Jul  03.  He  was
invited to submit post-service information, but  he  only  provided  a
letter from his wife and a friend. The FBI indicated they were  unable
to locate an arrest record. On 23 Sep 03, the Board denied his request
but again invited him to submit post-service information for  possible
reconsideration. For an accounting  of  the  facts  and  circumstances
surrounding the  applicant’s  separation  and  the  rationale  of  the
earlier decision by the  Board,  see  the  Record  of  Proceedings  at
Exhibit H.

In a letter dated 19  Dec  03,  the  applicant  provides  post-service
information and requests reconsideration. Included in  his  submission
are character statements as well as  a  resume,  certificates  of  job
training,  an  employee  performance   report,   and   a   jury   duty
confirmation. The applicant’s complete submission,  with  attachments,
is at Exhibit I.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading  the  applicant’s
general discharge to honorable. No evidence has been  presented  which
would lead us to believe his discharge was improper or contrary to the
directive under which it was effected. Nevertheless, in  view  of  his
successful transition to civilian life as demonstrated  by  the  post-
service documentation he provided and the FBI report indicating he has
been a law-biding citizen, a majority  of  the  Board  concludes  that
upgrading his discharge to honorable,  based  on  clemency,  would  be
appropriate.  Accordingly,   the   Board   majority   recommends   the
applicant’s general discharge be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 28 April 1975,
he was honorably  discharged  and  furnished  an  Honorable  Discharge
certificate.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 24 February 2004 under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                             Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
                             Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
                             Ms. Leslie E. Abbott, Member

A majority of the Board voted to correct the records, as  recommended.
Ms. Abbott voted to deny, but does  not  wish  to  submit  a  Minority
Report. The following documentary evidence relating to  AFBCMR  Docket
Number BC-2003-02158 was considered:

   Exhibit H.  Record of Proceedings, dated 21 Oct 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit I.  Applicant's Letter, dated 19 Dec 03, w/atchs.




                                   ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
                                   Panel Chair


AFBCMR BC-2003-02158




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to    , be corrected to show that, on 28 April 1975, he
was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge
certificate.




                                             JOE G. LINEBERGER
                                             Director
                                             Air Force Review Boards
Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02158

    Original file (BC-2003-02158.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not report for duty on 5 Feb 75. One reference is from his wife and the other appears to be from a friend. Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Aug 03, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01836

    Original file (BC-2003-01836.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 Aug 85, the applicant offered a conditional waiver of his right to an administrative discharge board contingent upon his receiving no less than a general discharge. Exhibit C. FBI Report - No Arrest Record Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 1 Jul 03. Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Jul 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201284

    Original file (0201284.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Oct 61, he was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order # 102, and HQ HQLMTC/JA letter with a bad conduct discharge. At that time, the applicant was again invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit G). Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 Jul 02, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02565

    Original file (BC-2003-02565.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Dec 72, the evaluation officer found that the applicant was unsuitable for further military service and recommended that he be discharged with a general discharge based on his history of violations of military and civilian law. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). Having found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01583

    Original file (BC-2003-01583.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Jun 03, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that he was not eligible for the AFOLTR because the award was not established until 12 Oct 80, after his separation from the Air Force on 9 Jan 80. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial because the applicant is not eligible for the AFOLTR, which is awarded only to service members who completed an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. After a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101436

    Original file (0101436.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Assistant NCOIC, Separation Procedures Section, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed applicant’s request and states that considering the discharge was almost 30 years ago, the type of offenses committed, and the fact that the member received a psychiatrist’s recommendation that he should have been administratively separated, clemency is recommended. Applicant indicated that she does not wish to provide a response to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00048

    Original file (BC-2003-00048.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00048 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02867

    Original file (BC-2004-02867.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Feb 97, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Based on his overall record of service, the contents of the FBI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02228

    Original file (BC-2003-02228.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s file does not contain an AF Form 31, Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her SPD code needs to be amended. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01912

    Original file (BC-2003-01912.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO advises that although the applicant was selected for promotion, she was on the Air Force Active Duty List (ADL) and should not have been considered for promotion by the Navy. The applicant has no entitlement to this promotion as she was on active duty with the Air Force at the time the Naval Reserve board convened and should not have been considered. Since the applicant was on active...