ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02158
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Not
Indicated
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In his appeal for reconsideration, the applicant asks that his 1975
general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 Jun 66 and served
as a squadron helicopter mechanic. After three years and ten months of
active service, he was honorably released from active duty on 7 Apr 70
and transferred to the Reserves. He reenlisted in the Regular Air
Force on 16 Jun 71 and was promoted to the grade of sergeant on 21 Jun
71.
The applicant began to experience depression brought about by marital
and financial difficulties and the loss of his career field. He
attempted to obtain a hardship discharge; however, the available
records did not indicate why this was not granted despite the
recommendations of a physician and a social worker. During an initial
flight physical, the applicant revealed intravenous amphetamine use
prior to reenlisting and amphetamine use two months before. The
records contained no additional documentation regarding the
amphetamine use and/or a Mental Health Clinic determination regarding
drug abuse.
The applicant began a series of absences without leave (AWOL). He
received three Article 15s and two Letters of Reprimand (LOR) for
these episodes, as well as for indebtedness and tardiness.
The commander recommended the applicant for general discharge. Legal
review noted that the only rehabilitative efforts were those inherent
in the imposition of nonjudicial punishment and administrative
reprimands and there appeared to be a lack of concern for counseling
regarding whatever problems the applicant may have been experiencing.
However, since the rehabilitation effort met the minimum standard, the
staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient.
The applicant was separated in the grade of airman with a general
discharge on 28 Apr 75 after a total of 7 years, 7 months and 26 days
of active service. He had 18 days of lost time.
The applicant appealed for an upgraded discharge in Jul 03. He was
invited to submit post-service information, but he only provided a
letter from his wife and a friend. The FBI indicated they were unable
to locate an arrest record. On 23 Sep 03, the Board denied his request
but again invited him to submit post-service information for possible
reconsideration. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale of the
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at
Exhibit H.
In a letter dated 19 Dec 03, the applicant provides post-service
information and requests reconsideration. Included in his submission
are character statements as well as a resume, certificates of job
training, an employee performance report, and a jury duty
confirmation. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments,
is at Exhibit I.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the applicant’s
general discharge to honorable. No evidence has been presented which
would lead us to believe his discharge was improper or contrary to the
directive under which it was effected. Nevertheless, in view of his
successful transition to civilian life as demonstrated by the post-
service documentation he provided and the FBI report indicating he has
been a law-biding citizen, a majority of the Board concludes that
upgrading his discharge to honorable, based on clemency, would be
appropriate. Accordingly, the Board majority recommends the
applicant’s general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 28 April 1975,
he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge
certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 24 February 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
Ms. Leslie E. Abbott, Member
A majority of the Board voted to correct the records, as recommended.
Ms. Abbott voted to deny, but does not wish to submit a Minority
Report. The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2003-02158 was considered:
Exhibit H. Record of Proceedings, dated 21 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. Applicant's Letter, dated 19 Dec 03, w/atchs.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-02158
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that, on 28 April 1975, he
was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge
certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards
Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02158
The applicant did not report for duty on 5 Feb 75. One reference is from his wife and the other appears to be from a friend. Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Aug 03, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01836
On 30 Aug 85, the applicant offered a conditional waiver of his right to an administrative discharge board contingent upon his receiving no less than a general discharge. Exhibit C. FBI Report - No Arrest Record Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 1 Jul 03. Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Jul 03.
On 5 Oct 61, he was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order # 102, and HQ HQLMTC/JA letter with a bad conduct discharge. At that time, the applicant was again invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit G). Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 Jul 02, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02565
On 21 Dec 72, the evaluation officer found that the applicant was unsuitable for further military service and recommended that he be discharged with a general discharge based on his history of violations of military and civilian law. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). Having found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01583
On 11 Jun 03, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that he was not eligible for the AFOLTR because the award was not established until 12 Oct 80, after his separation from the Air Force on 9 Jan 80. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial because the applicant is not eligible for the AFOLTR, which is awarded only to service members who completed an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. After a thorough review of...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Assistant NCOIC, Separation Procedures Section, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed applicant’s request and states that considering the discharge was almost 30 years ago, the type of offenses committed, and the fact that the member received a psychiatrist’s recommendation that he should have been administratively separated, clemency is recommended. Applicant indicated that she does not wish to provide a response to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00048
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00048 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02867
On 24 Feb 97, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Based on his overall record of service, the contents of the FBI...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02228
The applicant’s file does not contain an AF Form 31, Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her SPD code needs to be amended. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01912
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO advises that although the applicant was selected for promotion, she was on the Air Force Active Duty List (ADL) and should not have been considered for promotion by the Navy. The applicant has no entitlement to this promotion as she was on active duty with the Air Force at the time the Naval Reserve board convened and should not have been considered. Since the applicant was on active...