ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01515
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In his request for reconsideration, applicant requests that his
Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of “2Q” “Personnel medically
retired or discharged” be changed to one that would allow his reentry
into the Air Force.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He does not have the medically disqualifying condition of Polymorphous
Light Eruption. In support of his contention, the applicant has
provided letters from three health care professionals who have
determined that he does not presently have Polymorphous Light Eruption
and did not have the disease at the time of his discharge from the Air
Force.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 16 Jan 03, the AFBCMR considered and denied the above request
(Exhibit G).
_______________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the BCMR Medical Consultant provided
an additional Air Force evaluation. He recommends denial of the
applicant’s request. Although the cause of the applicant’s excessive
sensitivity to sunlight is not agreed upon by different dermatologists,
the undisputed fact remains that the applicant demonstrated abnormal
sensitivity to the sun that prevented him from satisfactorily
performing his duties for a prolonged period of time and thus rendered
him unfit for continued military duty. The statement provided by the
applicant from the Physician’s Assistant points out that the sun was
very intense at the location that the applicant was assigned. However,
the applicant must be able to accept assignments in any climate.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit I.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 25 Sep 03 for review and comment within 30 days. To
date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After again reviewing the complete
evidence of record, the majority of the Board agrees with the opinion
and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and accepts his
rationale as the basis for their conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, the majority of the Board finds no compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01515 in
Executive Session on 4 December 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Charlie E. Williams, Member
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to deny applicant’s request. Mr.
Williams voted to grant the applicant’s request but did not desire to
submit a minority report. The following additional documentary
evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 24 Jan 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 17 Jul 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
dated 16 Sep 03.
Exhibit J. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 25 Sep 03.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
(AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX
I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members. A majority found that applicant
had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and
recommended the case be denied. I concur with that finding and their
conclusion that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their
recommendation that the application be denied.
Please advise the applicant accordingly.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01515
On 19 Dec 00, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the applicant be separated from active service for Physical Disability with severance pay. Thus, there is no evidence provided that his condition of excessive sun sensitivity has actually improved. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 15 Nov 02 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03323
AFBCMR 02-03323 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01272
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 Jan 04, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment with 30 days. In this respect, the majority of the Board notes that at the time of the applicant’s enlistment in the Air Force Reserve, Delayed Enlistment Program, she listed XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX as her HOR. Accordingly, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02642 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given constructive credit for eight months of service and allowed to retire from the Air Force. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00377
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-00377 INDEX CODE 108.01 108.10 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect service-connected disability for Post-Traumatic- Stress Disorder (PTSD). He was assigned to the XXX Communications Squadron (XX CS) in Aviano AB, Italy, as the squadron administrative specialist. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02678
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02681 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. ____________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or...
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluated this application and recommends that the applicant’s request be denied. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02142
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02142 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and his “as met” Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the CY01B Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Selection Board be corrected to reflect the appropriate duty assignment history. ...
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a revised PRF as well as a copy of a letter sent to his Management Level Review president by his Senior Rater requesting that the revised PRF be substituted for the original PRF and the applicant meet an SSB. ____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Promotion Recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02020
His DAFSC for the effective date of 14 Jun 96 includes an incorrect “Q” prefix certifying him as an evaluator, which he never was. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX In Executive Session on 16 January 2003, we considered the applicant’s request for promotion consideration to major by Special Selection Board (SSB) for...