Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02957
Original file (BC-2003-02957.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02957
            INDEX CODE:  112.03

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His term of enlistment be changed from five years to four years.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He feels that the decision he made on his reenlistment  was  a  rushed
decision.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his AF Form 901,
Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD Form 4, and a copy of his DD Form
4/1,   Enlistment/Reenlistment   Document.     Applicant's    complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 19  May  1999,  in  the
grade of airman basic, for a period of four years.

On 29 July 2003, the applicant, while serving in the grade  of  senior
airman, was discharged from the Air Force.  He served four years,  two
months and eleven days of total active service.  On 30 July 2003,  the
applicant reenlisted for a period of five years.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE  recommends  disapproval.   The  applicant  executed   this
reenlistment under good faith and should have thought through any life
altering decisions he was making.  A complete copy of  the  evaluation
is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant  states  that  he  is  disappointed  with  the  advisory
opinion.  He again states that he made a  rushed  decision  and  truly
didn’t think it through thoroughly.  He further states that  he  knows
that the reduction of his enlistment from five to four years is asking
a lot, but he is extremely sure that if approved it would make  him  a
much happier and a much better airman.

Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  the  conclusion  that  the
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or   injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary or showing  that
he was miscounseled in  any  way,  we  find  no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 16 October 2003, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                       Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
                       Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
                       MS. Renee M. Collier, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in  connection  with
BC-2003-02957:


      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Aug 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 Sep 03.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 03.




                             CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                             Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616

    Original file (BC-2003-02616.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03088

    Original file (BC-2003-03088.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears that the applicant elected to enlist for a period of six years primarily on the presumption that he would receive an increased enlistment bonus after successful completion of Heating, Vent, Air Conditioning Refrigeration technical training. While we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that no error exists; after careful review of the evidence provided and the circumstances presented in this case, we believe that some form of relief is justified. Exhibit C....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02558

    Original file (BC-2003-02558.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    We note that, at the time the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was announced for the applicant’s career field, she had planned to extend her enlistment rather than reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was honorably discharged on 2 July 2003 rather than 31 July 2003 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01984

    Original file (BC-2003-01984.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States, a personal statement, and extracts from his military personnel and medical records. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01763

    Original file (BC-2003-01763.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01763 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 131.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank be changed from airman basic to airman first class. The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. The evidence of record reflects that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02757

    Original file (BC-2002-02757.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE indicates that an extension to an enlistment can be cancelled only if the reason for the extension no longer exists. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03322

    Original file (BC-2003-03322.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2003-03322 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02219

    Original file (BC-2003-02219.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s military personnel records reveal that, on 8 March 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (completion of active required service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR states the applicant’s service dates and date of rank to the grade of E-4 are correct. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03177

    Original file (BC-2003-03177.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    An AF Form 1411 (Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve) indicates that on 17 Apr 03, the applicant extended his enlistment for eight months to qualify for a permanent change of station (PCS) assignment, changing his DOS to 21 Apr 05. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02068

    Original file (BC-2003-02068.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02068 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DES IRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter from his wife, two letters of recommendation and a copy of his DD Form...