RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02435
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is a law-abiding citizen and is physically fit and ready to fight for
his country.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 26 March 1997.
The applicant was punished by article 15 for failure to go. In March 2001,
the suspended portion of the previously imposed article 15 punishment was
vacated because he was in physical control of a vehicle while drunk. On 25
March 2001, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 for
completion of required active service and was issued an honorable
discharge. He received a separation designator code of JBK and a RE code of
4E. He served four years on active duty.
Applicant does not contest the accuracy of the RE code and after reviewing
the applicable instruction, AFI 36-2606, it appears the RE code issued is
accurate.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim
of an error or injustice. At the time members are separated from the Air
Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their
service and circumstances of their separation. After a thorough review of
the evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances surrounding
the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in accordance with the
appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis upon which to
recommend favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-02435
in Executive Session on 10 December 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. J. Dean Yount, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul 03.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Thomas S. Markiewicz
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01907
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of discharge on 21 August 2002. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 July 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01155 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service, separation authority, separation code JFC, narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) 2C code be changed so that he may pursue a career in the military. The Air Force based this on the reported...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00314
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00314 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the United States Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM) with Valor. In support of his request, the applicant provided an AF IMT 3994 (Recommendation for Decoration Deployment/Contingency Operations) dated 17 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02026
He was presented to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) due to chronic pain in his left tibia. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE Code assigned at the time of his 6 December 1994 medical discharge is correct. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-00872
However, should the AFBCMR determine the medical condition warrants a disability discharge with severance pay, the appropriate RE code would be “2Q - Personnel medically retired or discharged.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 23 January 2004 for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03091
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03091 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would enable him to reenlist. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03789
As such, he was given an RE code of 4D. (Exhibit C) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 March 2003 for review and response within 30 days. The applicant’s assigned RE code of 4D accurately reflects that at the time of his separation he was serving in the grade of senior airman, he had at least nine years of active military service, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00392
On 14 January 2003, the applicant received an LOC for failure to obey an order or regulation. DPPAE states there is no evidence in the applicant’s record to support that the RE code she received is incorrect or that it created an injustice. Exhibit F. Letter of Recommendation, dated 3 May 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01765
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01765 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow his enlistment into the armed forces. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his assigned RE code is in error or contrary to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03678-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. The applicant’s medical evaluation was completed at Wilford Hall Medical Center on 17 October 2002 and the results were forwarded to the Board for review (refer to Exhibit I). The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit J. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 16 December 2002.