Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01484
Original file (BC-2003-01484.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-01484
                       INDEX CODE:  110.00
                       COUNSEL:  Disabled American
                                     Veterans

                       HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  under  other  than  honorable  conditions  (UOTHC)  discharge  be
upgraded to an honorable discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was young and immature and was not  given  a  chance  to  make  any
corrections, nor was he given any counseling.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by the 1973 fire
at the National Personnel Records Center and only limited  information
is available for review.

Available records, submitted by the applicant, indicate he enlisted in
the Regular Air Force on 28 June 1956 for a period of four years.   He
was discharged from the Air Force on 16 October 1958, in the grade  of
airman basic in accordance with AFR 39-17 (Unfitness), with  an  under
other than honorable conditions  (UOTHC)  discharge.   He  served  two
years, two months and two days of active duty service.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation,
Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which  is  attached
at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they are unable to determine the propriety of the
applicant’s discharge based  on  the  lack  of  documentation  in  his
records.  The applicant has not submitted any evidence, nor identified
any errors in the processing of his  discharge,  nor  did  he  provide
facts that support changing his separation.  They defer to  the  Board
to determine if the applicant’s request for relief should be granted.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 9 June 2003,  the  Board  staff  requested  the  applicant  provide
information regarding his post service activities (Exhibit F).

The applicant states he was very young and foolish at that  time.   He
had recently gotten married and after about a month his wife left  and
would not give him a reason for  her  leaving.   He  started  drinking
heavy and his downward trend started.  One day he was drunk and needed
more drinking money and he passed a three-dollar check.  Later he  was
arrested for the passed check and put in jail.  The  county  sheriff’s
office contacted the Air Force authorities and his attorney negotiated
a deal with the court and they dismissed the charges so the Air  Force
could handle the problem.  He was taken back to the base and  was  put
in the brig.  He was court-martialed and got  30  days  in  the  brig.
After getting out of the brig he was assigned to various offices while
his discharge was being processed.

Since leaving the Air Force, he has finished  high  school,  remarried
and raised  four  children.   He  has  six  grandchildren,  one  great
grandchild.  Over the years, he has tried to be a law-abiding  person.
He has not been in any trouble of any kind since the one incident.  He
has worked very hard over these years to try to be good and productive
person.

In support of his  request,  the  applicant  has  submitted  character
letters from friends (Exhibit G).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure of timely file.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate
the existence of an error or  injustice  warranting  the  applicant’s
discharge be upgraded.  It appears the  applicant’s  personnel  files
were apparently destroyed by fire in 1973; therefore,  based  on  the
presumption of regularity in the conduct of  government  affairs  and
without  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  must   assume   that   the
servicemember’s  separation  was  proper  and  in   compliance   with
appropriate directives.  Nevertheless, the Board finds that, in  view
of the applicant’s apparent successful transition to  civilian  life,
as evidenced by the post-service documentation he has  provided,  and
considering that the discharge is over 45 years old, the Board is  of
the opinion that upgrading his discharge, based on clemency, would be
appropriate.  Certainly we do not condone the behavior  that  led  to
his under other than honorable condition discharge; however, we  note
that he took full responsibility for his actions.   Therefore,  since
it serves no useful purpose to the Air Force or to society in general
to continue the nature  of  his  discharge  at  this  late  date,  we
recommend that his discharge be upgraded to an  honorable  discharge.
Accordingly, the Board recommends that  the  applicant’s  records  be
corrected as indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 16 October 1958, he
was  honorably  discharged  and  furnished  an   Honorable   Discharge
certificate.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-01484 in  Executive  Session  on  23  September  2003  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair
                 Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
                 Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member

All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 May 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  FBI Report.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 15 May 03.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 03.
   Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 9 Jun 03.
   Exhibit G.  Applicant’s Response, dated 22 Jun 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit H.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Jul 03.
   Exhibit I.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 22 Aug 03.



                                        JOHN L. ROBUCK
                                        Panel Chair






AFBCMR BC-2003-01484
INDEX CODE:  110.00





MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction for Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116) it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, SSN, be corrected to show that on 16
October 1958, he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable
Discharge certificate.




                             JOE G. LINEBERGER
                             Director
                             Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02024

    Original file (BC-2003-02024.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02024 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was told by the Air Force that his discharge would be upgraded to honorable in six months. Therefore, based on the information and evidence provided they recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02156

    Original file (BC-2003-02156.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02156 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). From 29 August 1952 to 24 September 1952, he was confined in civilian jail. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01125

    Original file (BC-2003-01125.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evaluation officer recommended the applicant receive a general discharge and not be considered for rehabilitation. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of investigation, Washington, D.C., indicated on the basis of the data furnished they were unable to locate an arrest record which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02129

    Original file (BC-2003-02129.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS indicated that they were unable to determine the propriety of the applicant's discharge based on the lack of documentation in his records. In their view, the applicant did not identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide any facts that supported upgrading his discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01460

    Original file (BC-2003-01460.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was told he would be discharged from the Air Force and could reenter after the tickets had been paid. Nor, has the applicant provided any evidence identifying any errors or injustices in the processing of his discharge. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAES states the reenlistment eligibility code "2C" is the applicable code for a member separated involuntarily with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization of service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01869

    Original file (BC-2003-01869.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01869 INDEX CODE: 110.10 COUNSEL: The Salvation Army HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that there is no documentation in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00141

    Original file (BC-2003-00141.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00141 INDEX CODES: 108.00, 121.02, 123.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he is entitled to payment for lost time from 24 Nov 70 to 4 Feb 71 and six (6) days of forfeited accrued leave. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03899

    Original file (BC-2002-03899.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03899 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general, under honorable conditions, discharge be upgraded to honorable. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01744

    Original file (BC-2003-01744.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01744 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his name as *, rather than *. While his records have been corrected to reflect his first name as *, rather than *, his DD Form 214 is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03376

    Original file (BC-2002-03376.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Dec 59 and 18 Oct 78, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...