RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00639
INDEX NUMBER: 145.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be made eligible to receive Disability Service Pay.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he joined the Air Force, he was in very good health and later
became ill while serving. He was discharged from the hospital on 22
May 56 with a physical disability of severe internal bleeding. He was
concerned about his future health in civilian life, but was told once
he left the Air Force, he was not entitled to any further help. He
believes that he was wrongly denied medical assistance and basic
compensation.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 24 Jun 55 and
within two weeks developed recurring symptoms of bloody diarrhea and
abdominal pain subsequently diagnosed as ulcerative colitis in Jan 56.
In Mar 56, he was admitted to the hospital for evaluation and a
recommendation made to return him to civilian life. The applicant was
referred to a medical evaluation board (MEB) that determined that the
applicant was incapacitated for further military service because of
recurrent, bloody diarrhea. It was recommended that he appear before
a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). On 30 Apr 56, applicant appeared
before a PEB. The PEB determined that the applicant was unfit and his
disability might be permanent and was not compensable. He was
diagnosed with colitis, ulcerative, universal, moderate, slightly
improved, with infrequent exacerbations. The disability was rated at
10 percent and considered to have existed prior to service. The
applicant did not concur with the PEB finding that his condition
existed prior to service and submitted a rebuttal. The Physical
Review Council concurred with the PEB and recommended to the Secretary
of the Air Force Personnel Council that the applicant be separated
without disability severance pay. The applicant was subsequently
discharged on 22 May 56 under the authority of Air Force Manual 35-4
for physical disability that existed prior to service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s
request. The applicant developed symptoms of ulcerative colitis while
in basic military training and was discharged without compensation for
a chronic medical condition that existed prior to service. The
applicant claimed that he did not have any symptoms of his ulcerative
colitis prior to entering active duty. Ulcerative colitis is a
chronic inflammatory disease of the colon that usually has an
insidious onset but may present abruptly. The PEB concluded that the
applicant’s ulcerative colitis existed prior to service because it
manifested so close to the date that he entered active duty that the
disease could not have originated in so short a period. Later DoD
disability policy was clarified to state: “Signs or symptoms of
chronic disease identified so soon after the day of entry on Military
Service (usually within 180 days) that the disease could not have
originated in that short a period will be accepted as proof that the
disease manifested prior to entrance into Military Service” (current
DoDI 1332.38). Had the PEB concluded that the applicant’s condition
did not exist prior to entering service, the applicant would have been
discharged with severance pay at 10%. He would not have received a
disability retirement.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Following
their assessment, they determined that the applicant was treated
fairly throughout the Air Force disability evaluation process.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In response to the Air Force evaluations, the applicant again
reiterates that upon entering the military, he was in good health. He
completed basic training with no health problems whatsoever. He
states that the statements in the BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation
that he had already experienced symptoms of ulcerative colitis are
untrue and unfounded. He was not treated for ulcerative colitis two
weeks into basic training as stated in the Memorandum.
It is his understanding, based upon the diagnosis of military and
private sector physicians, that the actual determination of when
ulcerative colitis begins or ends cannot be accurately diagnosed. In
fact, he has been led to believe that a complete cure for ulcerative
colitis is not available. Based on these issues, he finds it hard to
believe that his condition of ulcerative colitis was a pre-existing
health condition simply because symptoms began to present themselves
months after he entered the Air Force.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. We note the applicant’s assertions
that statements made about when he developed Ulcerative Colitis are
incorrect. However, his records clearly show that this was the
determination made at the time of his PEB and that his nonconcurrence
with the PEB findings was considered before the final adjudication of
his case. Other than his own assertions, he has not provided any
credible evidence that warrants an overturn of a decision made over 47
years ago. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-
00639 in Executive Session on 20 August 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Ms. Leslie Abbott, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Feb 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
dated 2 Jun 03.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPD, dated 18 Jun 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Jun 03.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Jun 03.
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002182C070206
The applicant states he was medically retired in error by a doctor who determined he had ulcerative colitis. The evaluating physician noted the applicant was 27 years old, and had complained of bloody diarrhea with four or five bowel movements a day in December 1996. There is no medical evidence supporting the applicant's contention that his tobacco use was the cause of the medical condition which resulted in his retirement by reason of physical disability.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01269
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01269BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20140618 SEPARATION DATE: 20041105 I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00390
He was referred to the Air Force Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and the Informal PEB determined he was unfit for continued military service. His overall condition is therefore considered to be moderate at the time of separation from service. The other conditions rated by the VA were not evaluated as part of the DES process and could not be considered by the Board.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02781
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. I have carefully...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00474
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated with a 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Condition 1: Ulcerative Colitis It recommended separation from service with a rating of 10% for 7323 Ulcerative Colitis.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00518
Ulcerative Colitis Condition. The Board concluded therefore that no separate disability rating could be recommended for this condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: VASRD CODE RATING 7323 COMBINED 30% 30% UNFITTING CONDITION Ulcerative colitis The following...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014458
The applicant states, in effect, his record is in error because he does not have ulcerative colitis, a lifetime disease, which would keep him from serving in the Army. He further states that his doctor told him that tobacco did not cause his ulcerative colitis. The evidence shows that the applicant was diagnosed and treated for the ulcerative colitis.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01285
The InformalPEBadjudicated ulcerative colitis as unfitting, rated 10%with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Both the PEB and VA applied VASRD code 7323 (ulcerative colitis) and rated it 10% citing “moderate with infrequent exacerbations.” Rating options for Colitis are based on health during remissions, complications and frequency of attacks/exacerbations. Both exams document that he was on medications and the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00862
The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. TDRL RATING COMPARISON: Service TDRL Exit IPEB Dated 20030808 VA* All Effective Date 20031023 Entry on TDRL 20010514 Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Condition Code TDRL Sep. Ulcerative Colitis 7323 30% 10% Ulcerative Colitis 7323 10% 20040122 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CIs disability and separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02223
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02223 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to allow reentry in the military. On 20 Mar 09, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) reviewed the case file with medical records and determined the ulcerative colitis was unfitting with a disability rating of...