RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00094
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The 13-month extension of her enlistment contract be voided so that she may
separate.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her reenlistment contract is incorrect. She was told that if she
reenlisted for a 6-year term, that it would cancel out her extension. That
information was incorrect, the extension was an obligated service
commitment. This makes her contract incorrect. She does not wish to
accomplish a new contract. She wishes to separate.
In support of her request applicant provided a copy of her AF Force Form
901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex, DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment
Document Armed Forces of the United States, and AF Form 1411, Extension or
Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force
Reserve.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of
senior airman. On 14 July 2000, the applicant extended her 17 March 1997
enlistment for 13 months to qualify for an assignment. On 11 July 2001,
the member reenlisted for 6 years.
On 26 August 2002, the commander imposed nonjudicial punishment on the
applicant because of divers occasions, from on or about 2 January 2002 to
on or about 25 April 2002, she was derelict in the performance of those
duties in that she willfully failed to discharge her duties as Unit Leave
Monitor by altering her leave forms and the leave forms of other members in
the squadron. The commander imposed punishment consisting of reduction to
the grade of airman first class, suspended until 28 February 2003, after
which time it will be remitted without further action, unless sooner
vacated, a forfeiture of $150 of her pay. Reprimand. The applicant
indicated that she would appeal and submit additional matters. On 9
September 2002, the commander denied her appeal. The Article 15 was found
legally sufficient on 3 October 2002.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial and states that member signed a valid
reenlistment form and entered a valid reenlistment under the policy that
was in effect at the time. The Full Enlistment Program went into effect in
June 2001 and policy did not allow for grandfathering of anyone affected by
the changes in this program. This program stated that all airmen will
serve their current obligated service and any additional enlistment would
be added to this obligated service. At the time, the member reenlisted (11
July 2001), airmen were allowed to reenlist for 6 years and the obligated
service would be incorporated into their existing enlistment. As member
did not receive a Selective Reenlistment Bonus for this reenlistment, she
was not penalized monetarily under this program.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14
February 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence
of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her 13-
month extension should be canceled. Applicant contends that she was
miscounseled concerning cancellation of her 13-month extension when she
reenlisted 11 July 2001. However, she has failed to provide sufficient
documentation to support her allegation. It appears that applicant, based
on her allegation of miscounseling, wants her ll July 2001 reenlistment
voided so that she can separate. As stated above, we find no evidence
showing that she has been the victim of either an error or an injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis
upon which to recommend favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of a material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00094
in Executive Session on 6 May 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Vaughn Schlunz, Member
Ms. Mary J. Johnson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 3 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Feb 03.
ROSCOE HINTON,JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00288
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an assignment notification to Incirlik ABS, Turkey, and was advised that she would have to extend for 14 months to obtain retainability for this assignment. On 15 August 2003 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Air Force for a period of 4 years and 18 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03913
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he was required to extend his current enlistment for 18 months to meet the service obligation for an in-place overseas tour, he requested to extend to his high year of tenure date (HYTD) of 8 April 2007. The applicant’s HYT as a Master Sergeant, at the time of his extension, was 8 April 2007 (24 years). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01885
The extension was not cancelled per his request. They indicated that on AF Form 1411, section VIII, the applicant initialed the block that states “I understand if the original reason for which I extended is cancelled, I may request cancellation of this extension provided I have not entered it. The evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 June 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02161
On 7 April 2004 applicant applied for a CJR and was approved on 14 April 2004. DPPAE states effective 29 April 2004, the applicant’s SRB was deleted and she was not eligible to reenlist at that time to receive the SRB due to her not being within 3 months prior to her expiration term of service (ETS). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00187
However, applicant’s medical condition was considered restricting and required an Assignment Limitation Code C. Applicant was not mobility qualified. The evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAMM indicates that the applicant has had chronic leg pain since basic training. It is fair to note that at the time of her separation, there were no limitations on her assignability by the Medical Standards Branch.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02754
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02754 INDEX CODE: 112.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: A constructive reenlistment to change his term of enlistment (TOE) from six to four years. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00195
She requests consideration for either a bonus for prior service or a reenlistment bonus. There has not been a program in place since 1990 that allows prior service members to reenlist and receive a bonus. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01747
In a 15 Nov 02 letter to the applicant, the Superintendent of the --rd Wing IG with the Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) advised that, following an interview, the briefer denied having the conversation with the applicant and asserted she had briefed countless individuals regarding declination statements and was well aware of the ramifications. The handout directed him to the MPF for counsel if his desire was to separate. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03891
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03891 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The extension of her enlistment she entered into on 13 Dec 01 be corrected to reflect inclusive dates of 5 Jul 04 to 4 Jan 05. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...