RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03977
INDEX CODE: 128.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for premiums deducted from his pay for Family
Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was unaware of the 1 Nov 01 FSGLI change. If he had known of the
change, he would have declined.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his Nov 02
Leave and Earnings Statement and a copy of SGLV Form 8286A (Family
Coverage Election), dated 4 Oct 02. The applicant’s complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
staff sergeant, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 Aug 02.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied due to lack of
sufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim. On 16 Jan 03,
DPW sent the applicant a letter requesting additional information in
order for them to sufficiently evaluate his claim and to make an
appropriate recommendation. The applicant did not respond to their
letter. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 21
Mar 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. His contentions are duly noted.
However, the applicant was properly charged with a debt as a result of
the passage of Public Law 106-419, Section 312, effective 1 Apr 01,
which automatically increased the level of SGLI coverage. Since the
applicant did not provide the additional information requested in
order to sufficiently evaluate his claim, it is our opinion that no
basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. Therefore, the
applicant’s request is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-
03977 in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPW, dated 7 Mar 03, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 03.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03849
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Applicant's Master...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03848
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Applicant's Master...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393
DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums he paid for the period of 1 August 2002 through 31 January 2003. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00116
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 April 2003, for review and comment. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the FSGLI premiums she paid from November 2001 to December 2002. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02975
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied due to lack of sufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim. Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Sep 02. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPW, dated 3 Dec 02, w/atch Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Dec 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01091
Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02018
Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03984
In support of her application, the applicant submits a copy of her Family Coverage Election form, dated 4 October 2002; and a copy of her leave and earnings statement, dated 1-30 November 2002. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim, it is our opinion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01347
He sent in payments marking out family coverage but this was not sufficient to cancel. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends denial of the request and states the applicant claims he never has been notified of the automatic family coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...