RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03879
INDEX CODE: 137.04
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to permit him to elect spouse coverage under the
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He declined spouse coverage under SBP at the time of his retirement because
his current wife was dying of cancer. He has now remarried and wishes to
change his election to spouse coverage.
The applicant provided no evidence in support of his appeal. The
applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was relieved from active duty on 31 August 1979 with 21
years, 8 months and 28 days of service and retired in the grade of
technical sergeant effective 1 September 1979.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPTR recommends denial. There is no evidence of an Air Force error
or injustice in this case. Had the applicant elected spouse only SBP at
the time of his retirement, coverage and costs would have been suspended
upon the death of his spouse. Coverage would have been reinstated on the
first anniversary of his marriage to each subsequent spouse.
A member, who has an eligible beneficiary, but fails to elect coverage for
that person, may not later provide coverage for that person, or another
person of the same category except during congressionally-mandated open
enrollment period. Public Laws (PLs) 97-35, 101-189, and 105-261
authorized open enrollment periods (1 October 1981 - 30 September 1982, 1
April 1982 - 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 - 29 February 2000,
respectively.) During each enrollment period, members were advised by
direct mail of their eligibility to make an election. The applicant had an
opportunity to elect coverage for his current wife during the 1999-2000
open enrollment season; however, there is no evidence that he submitted a
valid election. SBP is similar to commercial life insurance in that an
individual must elect to participate and pay the associated premiums in
order to provide coverage. It would be inequitable to those members, who
chose to elect spouse coverage when eligible and subsequently received
reduced retire pay, to provide an additional opportunity for this member to
provide SBP coverage. Had the applicant elected SBP spouse coverage, his
premiums would have been approximately $81 per month. If relief is
granted, retroactive costs approximate $20,000 plus interest. The DPPTR
evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17
January 2003 for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the evidence of
record, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim of an
error or injustice. Since the applicant chose not to elect SBP coverage
for his spouse at the time of his retirement, he will have to wait for a
congressionally-mandated open enrollment period to elect coverage for that
beneficiary or another person of the same category. The applicant had an
opportunity to elect SBP coverage for his current spouse during the 1999-
2000 open enrollment period; however, he has not provided any evidence that
he submitted a valid election. In addition, the applicant has provided no
evidence that would lead us to believe that the SBP counselor provided
misleading or inaccurate information at the time of his retirement.
Therefore, in the absence of substantive evidence to the contrary, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Accordingly, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 8 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mrs. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Member
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket No. BC-2002-03879:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Dec 02, with attachments.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 9 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jan 03.
KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01319
On 17 October 1998, PL 105-261 established an SBP open enrollment from 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000 for servicemembers who were not participating at the fullest extent and a non-participant could elect coverage. The applicant’s records reflect his SBP coverage was terminated under PL 99-145 within the first year of his marriage to D. PL 105-261 did not prohibit servicemembers from making an election during open enrollment if they had not resumed spouse coverage when they remarried....
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01423
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR notes if the member submitted an open enrollment election and survives for two years, his spouse would be entitled to an SBP annuity of approximately $685 per month upon his death. The applicant contends he was advised, in August 2004, that he had to wait for one year after his marriage to secure Survivor Benefit Plan coverage for his second spouse and subsequently, in July 2005, he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03883
The deceased member elected spouse only SBP coverage based on full, retired pay effective 30 November 1988. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPTR recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03764
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR recommend that applicant’s request be denied and stated that there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice, or merit in fact, nor basis in law to approve this case. Briefing material used at the time the member completed his RSFPP election clearly stated that “dependents acquired after you retire are not eligible to receive Family Protection Plan annuity payments,” payments would only...
The evidence also establishes the deceased member’s efforts to provide the applicant with all the benefits she was entitled to as the spouse of a retired service member. Microfiche records verify SBP enrollment packets and newsletters were mailed to the address the decedent provided to the finance center during the 1981-1982 and 1992-1993 open enrollment periods. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00401
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states that a participant’s spouse automatically becomes an eligible beneficiary on the first anniversary of the marriage unless, before that date, a valid election to not resume the coverage under the provisions of PL 99-145 is sent to the finance center. The applicant submitted a valid request to reinstate SBP coverage on R--- ’s behalf within the time permitted, changed his mind about...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02726
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: At the time of the servicemember’s retirement on 1 April 1976, he and the applicant were married and he declined to elect spouse coverage under the SBP. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states the laws that controlled SBP precluded a married servicemember, who declined spouse coverage at the time of retirement, from providing SBP former...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01570
He told her that her husband was making SBP payments and therefore she should have been receiving an annuity after his death. DPPTR states there is no basis in law to waive the two-year survival requirement; however, if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the record could be corrected to show the member elected spouse only SBP coverage based on full-retired pay on 27 July 1977, prior to the first marriage anniversary. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00460
DPPTR states that if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the member’s record should be corrected to reflect he declined spouse and child coverage effective 29 September 1982, and correction should be contingent upon the member’s waiving refund of any SBP premiums deducted before and after the death of his wife. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03330 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant is the widow of the former servicemember who requests corrective action that would entitle her to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. The servicemember died on 5 August 1985, but the applicant did not apply for the...