Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01423
Original file (BC-2006-01423.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01423
            INDEX CODE:  137.04

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Corrective action be taken that would permit him to  provide  Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his wife.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In August 2004, he was told to wait for one year after his marriage to
request SBP coverage.  On 11 July 2005, he reported  to  the  Military
Personnel Flight (MPF) and was told he had been misinformed previously
and to quickly mail  in  a  request  for  coverage  accompanied  by  a
marriage certificate.  He did so and received a reply that he and  his
spouse were not eligible. They were also informed they could wait  for
an open enrollment period scheduled for October but  that  they  would
owe an additional $3,080.09 because they had been incorrectly  briefed
about waiting for a year to apply.  By the time he returned  from  the
MPF, the post office was closed.  He was not able to send  the  letter
until 12 July 2005.  His wife was issued  a  Social  Security  Account
Number (SSAN) subsequent to his request.  He notes  his  understanding
that if granted, he will be responsible  for  premiums  back  to  July
2005.

In support of his  appeal,  the  applicant  has  provided  a  marriage
certificate and copies of email  and  correspondence  generated  as  a
result of his action to obtain coverage.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was unmarried, had no eligible  children,  and  declined
SBP coverage prior to  his  1  April  2004  retirement.   The  Defense
Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records show  him  and
his first spouse had married on 31 May 1999.  Neither party  submitted
a valid spouse SBP election within the first year of  their  marriage.
They divorced on 1 December 2001 and he married his second  spouse  on
12 July 2004.  Since he bypassed the  opportunity  to  add  his  first
spouse to the SBP when first eligible, coverage for his current spouse
can only be obtained during an open enrollment.   The  2005-2006  open
enrollment authorized by Public Law (PL) 108-375 required  members  to
pay a lump sum buy-in within 24 months after making an election.   The
amount of the buy-in is based on the  earliest  date  the  member  was
eligible to elect coverage.  In his case, his lump sum buy-in would be
approximately $7,540 and the monthly cost would be about $81.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPTR notes if the member submitted an open  enrollment  election
and survives for two years, his spouse would be  entitled  to  an  SBP
annuity of approximately $685  per  month  upon  his  death.   SBP  is
similar to commercial life insurance in that an individual must  elect
to participate and pay  the  associated  premiums  in  order  to  have
coverage.  Approval of this request would provide  him  an  additional
opportunity  to  elect  SBP  coverage  not  afforded  other   retirees
similarly situated and is not justified.  Therefore, DPPRT  recommends
his request for SBP coverage be denied.

DPPRT’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant contends he and his first spouse  were  married  on  31  May
1999.  They  separated  within  the  first  year  of  their  marriage.
Besides seeing no point in applying for SBP when they had  decided  to
terminate  their  marriage,  he  considered  such  an  action  to   be
fraudulent under the circumstances.  He hopes he will not be penalized
for not applying for SBP by 30 May 2000 when they  had  begun  divorce
proceedings prior to that date.  He  notes  should  the  Board  decide
against him that he will be responsible for  approximately  $7,540  in
penalty payments to cover the time period he was either divorced or in
the process of becoming divorced.

Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.
3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice.  The applicant contends he  was
advised, in August 2004, that he had to wait for one  year  after  his
marriage to secure Survivor  Benefit  Plan  coverage  for  his  second
spouse and subsequently, in July 2005, he was advised by the MPF  that
he was previously misinformed. As a result, he was not  able  to  take
advantage of the Survivor Benefit Plan program during the  time  frame
he was actually entitled to. The Board is of the opinion the applicant
has established sufficient doubt as to whether or not he was  properly
informed as to the course of action  he  should  take  to  secure  SBP
coverage for his spouse after his marriage. In view of the  above  and
to eliminate any doubt and possible injustice  to  the  applicant,  we
believe his records should be corrected as indicated below.

______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on  30  May  2000,  he
elected spouse only Survivor Benefit  Plan  coverage  based  on  full,
retired pay; that coverage was suspended  on  2  December  2001;  and,
coverage was reinstated on 11 July 2005 naming Christina  C.  Anderson
as the eligible beneficiary.

______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01423  in  Executive  Session  on  5  October  2006,  under   the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
      Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 May 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 5 Jul 06.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jul 06.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Jul 06, w/atch.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair



                         DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
                                WASHINGTON DC


[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary



AFBCMR BC-2006-01423



MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 30 May 2000,
he elected spouse only Survivor Benefit Plan coverage based on full,
retired pay; that coverage was suspended on 2 December 2001; and,
coverage was reinstated on 11 July 2005 naming SPOUSE as the eligible
beneficiary.





     JOE G. LINEBERGER

     Director

     Air Force Review Boards Agency


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01292

    Original file (BC-2006-01292.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes that because of the erroneous information he was given about having to wait a minimum of one year for enrolling his second wife, he ended up not getting SBP before applying for a divorce from her. Therefore, he believes he should have SBP coverage for his present spouse, being effective 7 March 2006. The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records reflect he divorced...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01319

    Original file (BC-2005-01319.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 October 1998, PL 105-261 established an SBP open enrollment from 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000 for servicemembers who were not participating at the fullest extent and a non-participant could elect coverage. The applicant’s records reflect his SBP coverage was terminated under PL 99-145 within the first year of his marriage to D. PL 105-261 did not prohibit servicemembers from making an election during open enrollment if they had not resumed spouse coverage when they remarried....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00743

    Original file (BC-2006-00743.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had the applicant submitted a valid election within the time prescribed for making an SBP election after retirement, monthly premiums would be approximately $81. Approval of this request would provide the applicant an additional opportunity to elect SBP coverage not afforded other retirees similarly situated and is not justified. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00962

    Original file (BC-2006-00962.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00962 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant is the ex-spouse of the deceased former servicemember, who requests her former late husband’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02726

    Original file (BC-2005-02726.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: At the time of the servicemember’s retirement on 1 April 1976, he and the applicant were married and he declined to elect spouse coverage under the SBP. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states the laws that controlled SBP precluded a married servicemember, who declined spouse coverage at the time of retirement, from providing SBP former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03820

    Original file (BC-2005-03820.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 1999, the applicant submitted a request to terminate his SBP coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85. PL 108-375 authorized an open enrollment period from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006 to enroll in SBP, but the law stipulates that servicemembers who terminated coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85 can not renter the program. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03700

    Original file (BC-2006-03700.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRT states it would be inequitable to those members, who chose to elect spouse coverage during the 2004-2005 open enrollment period, paid the buy-in retroactive amount and received reduced retired pay to provide an additional opportunity for this member to change his SBP election. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02917

    Original file (BC-2005-02917.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force developed the SBP RIP (report-individual person), a tool for counselors to use for one-on-one briefings conducted prior to a member’s retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01176

    Original file (BC-2005-01176.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence the applicant elected coverage for his spouse during these time periods. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03410

    Original file (BC-2005-03410.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement he was erroneously briefed on his options for SBP. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states a servicemember who has eligible children at the time of retirement and declines to elect coverage for them under SBP, may not provide coverage for any child in the future, unless an open enrollment period has been...