ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2001-01286
COUNSEL: MR. JOHN E. TUTHILL
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicant’s request for reconsideration he is requesting that his
records be corrected to reflect advancement to the grade of captain,
effective 10 February 1982.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the period under review, the applicant maintained dual status as an
enlisted member on active duty and as an officer in the Air Force Reserve.
The applicant’s Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) is 20
February 1947.
On 20 February 1947, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant (2LT),
Air-Reserve, in the Officers’ Reserve Corps (ORS), Army of the United
States. On 9 April 1951, he was relieved from his Reserve assignment and
appointed in the Air Force of the United States. He was promoted to the
temporary grade of 2LT, Regular Air Force, on 13 April 1951, and to the
temporary grade of first lieutenant (1LT) on 30 October 1952, Regular Air
Force. The applicant was released from active duty in the grade of 1LT on
4 July 1953 and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. The applicant’s
Statement of Service shows no active duty performed in a Reserve
commissioned status subsequent to 6 August 1956. On 4 January 1957, while
in an inactive Reserve status, he was promoted to the grade of captain,
Reserve of the Air Force, with an indefinite term appointment.
While assigned to the Nonaffiliated Reserve Section (NARS) at the Air
Reserve Personnel Center, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force
on 27 June 1957 in the grade of airman third class. He continued to
reenlist, with his last reenlistment on 27 June 1966 for a period of six
years in the grade of technical sergeant. He was progressively promoted to
the grade of master sergeant, with an effective date and date of rank of 1
July 1968.
While in NARS (Standby reservists not normally involved actively in any
Reserve participation programs - eligible for promotion), the applicant was
promoted to the grade of major, Reserve of the Air Force, effective 1 April
1964. On 5 August 1968, he was relieved from NARS and transferred to the
Ready Reinforcement Personnel Section (RRPS) at the Air Reserve Personnel
Center (this section consists of reservists in a ready status without a
unit affiliation, Reserve participation is not required while on Extended
Active Duty (EAD) - eligible for promotion). In 1971, he was relieved from
RRPS and transferred to NARS.
On 31 May 1972, the applicant was relieved from active duty and retired in
the grade of master sergeant (E-7) on 1 June 1972. He had completed a
total of 20 years, 3 months and 21 days of active service for retirement.
Retirement Order AC-5436, dated 14 February 1972, reveals that he held the
Reserve grade of Major, with 1LT as the highest grade held while on active
duty and that he was assigned to the Retired Reserve List.
Title 10, United States Code, Section 8964, entitles retired airmen to be
advanced to the highest grade satisfactorily held for at least six months
while on active duty as determined by the Secretary of the Air Force. On
23 April 1976, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC)
made the determination that the applicant did serve satisfactorily on
active duty in the grade of 1LT and directed that he be advanced to the
grade of 1LT, effective 10 February 1982. On 10 February 1982, the
applicant was advanced to the grade of 1LT on the USAF Retired List by
reason of completing a total of 30 years of service plus service on the
retired list.
A similar appeal requesting his records be corrected to reflect advancement
to the grade of major, effective 10 February 1982, was considered and
denied by the Board on 29 August 2001. A summary of the evidence
considered by the Board and the rationale for its decision is set forth in
the Record of Proceedings, AFBCMR Docket Number 01-01286, which is attached
at Exhibit F.
On 1 October 2001, the applicant’s request for reconsideration of his
application, submitted through his congressman, was denied (Refer to
Exhibit G).
In the applicant’s most recent request for reconsideration, submitted
through his congressman, he contends that his Statement of Service, DD Form
13, is missing active duty service while serving in the grade of captain.
To support this assertion, the applicant provided copies of his Individual
Flight Records (AF Forms 5) which he believes reflects service performed in
the grade of captain and copies of additional correspondence concerning the
issue under review. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Pursuant to the Board’s request for an audit of the applicant’s service
record, HQ AFPC/DPPAOR reviewed the applicant’s master personnel record and
found the DD Form 13, Statement of Service, to be correct. DPPAOR located
the actual document (AF Form 190, USAF Reserve Personnel Record Card -- For
Retention, Promotion and Retirement) used to record the applicant’s Reserve
service participation. DPPAOR states that this document covers the period
from 1 July 1956 to 30 June 1957, the period that is in question regarding
active duty service credit. During this period, there is only one active
duty service participation from 23 July 1956 to 6 August 1956 that accounts
for 15 points, which is reflected on the DD Form 13. The remaining credit
was 89 points for inactive duty service participation. The total amount of
points for the whole year was 104. Comparing the dates annotated on AF
Form 5, Individual Flight Record (PILOT), against the dates annotated on AF
Form 190, DPPAOR finds the dates match (except for 20 January 1956) the
credit received for inactive duty service participation. DPPAOR finds no
error was made on the credit the applicant received for active duty service
participation in the Air Force Reserve. The HQ AFPC/DPPAOR evaluation,
with attachment, is at Exhibit I.
HQ AFPC/DPPRRP provided the following comments concerning retirement
processing actions. DPPRRP states that, based on the fact that HQ
AFPC/DPPAOR has verified the validity of the DD Form 13, their previous
advisory is correct and recommends the applicant’s request be denied. At
the time the applicant retired, he held the Reserve grade of major, but had
never served on active duty in any higher grade than first lieutenant
(1LT). The DD Form 13 reflects applicant’s active duty service and shows
he held the grade of 1LT on active duty from 30 October 1952 to 4 July
1953. The active duty service that is in question for the period of 23
July 1956 to 6 August 1956 was in the grade of 1LT; applicant was not
promoted to captain until 4 January 1957. The applicant had continuous
active duty from 27 June 1957 to 31 May 1972, but was serving on active
duty in enlisted status and retired, effective 1 June 1972. DPPRRP
indicates that the law which allows for advancement of enlisted members of
the Air Force, when their active service plus service on the retired list
totals 30 years, is very specific in its application and intent. There are
no other provisions of law that would allow for advancement of enlisted
members for inactive service. All criteria of the pertinent laws (Section
8964 and 8992) have been met in this regard and no error or injustices in
the applicant’s retirement, grade determination or advancement action. The
HQ AFPC/DPPRRP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit J.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Having been provided the advisory opinions, the applicant submitted a
personal statement for the Board’s review in which he believes the advisory
writer compared his individual flight records for the wrong year. He has
provided another copy of his individual flight records, covering the period
from January 1957 to June 1957, for the Board’s review. The records
reflect he was on active duty as a captain during the time period in
question. The applicant’s review, with attachments, and the congressional
inquiry are at Exhibit L.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support
of the appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s records should be
corrected to reflect advancement to the grade of captain. In his most
recent submissions, the applicant asserts that his flight records clearly
indicate he was on active duty during the period January - June 1957 and
that, during this time frame, he held the grade of captain. Although his
flight records during the period in question reflect the grade of captain
and that, on 26 June 1957, he was separated from active Reserve to inactive
Reserve, this, in and by itself, does not substantiate that he was serving
on active duty. In this respect, we compared applicant’s USAF Reserve
Personnel Record Card -- for Retention, Promotion and Retirement (AF Form
190) against his Individual Flight Records (AF Forms 5) during the period
under review. We note applicant’s AF Form 190, which is the document used
to record Reserve service participation, only credits the applicant with
being on active duty during the period 23 July to 6 August 1956. The
remaining timeframe of 7 August 1956 to 26 June 1957 reveals that he was
credited with inactive duty training points, with no active duty point
credit. In view of the foregoing, it is our opinion that, while the
applicant was actively participating in the Air Force Reserve in the grade
of captain, he was in an inactive duty status while performing his training
during the period in question. After thoroughly reviewing all the evidence
presented, we are convinced that the highest grade in which the applicant
served, while on active duty, was as a first lieutenant. We have seen no
evidence that shows to our satisfaction the applicant met the statutory
requirements for advancement to the higher grade of captain on the USAF
Retired List. Accordingly, in view of the above and absent sufficient
evidence to the contrary, we have no basis on which to favorably consider
the requested relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 24 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Member
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2001-01286.
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 4 September 2001,
with Exhibits.
Exhibit G. Congressional Inquiry, dated 28 September 2001,
with attachments.
Exhibit H. Congressional Inquiry, dated 23 October 2001,
with attachments.
Exhibit I. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAOR, dated 19 August 2002,
with attachment.
Exhibit J. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 23 August 2002,
with attachments.
Exhibit K. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 August 2002.
Exhibit L. Applicant’s Letter, dated 16 September 2002,
with attachments, and a Congressional Inquiry,
dated 8 October 2002, with attachments.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01237
On 2 April 1944, the applicant was appointed a temporary second lieutenant (2LT), Air Corps, Army of the United States, and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty. On 23 October 1945, the applicant was recommended for promotion to the grade of first lieutenant (1LT) based on his service record and because it was presumed that if he had not been a POW, he would have been promoted. He was promoted to the grade of captain, Reserve of the Air Force, with an effective date of 1 July 1955.
On 2 January 1968, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the applicant's request for reappointment in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of captain and for assignment to the Retired Reserve. After review of the records, DAO found no error or injustice in the application of procedures in effect at the time of applicant's appointment. - Letters from applicant, dated 30 Dec 97 and Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Member Panel Chair The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01381
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Prior to 1 Jul 92, 100% (day-for-day) service credit was earned by personnel completing the EDP. The governing Reserve AFI and the active duty instruction provide for the same result--half credit for the time the applicant spends in school. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant awarding the applicant 100% credit for time spent in...
Computation of pay credit is not required.” She was recalled to extended active duty (EAD) from inactive Reserve status on 4 January 1998. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Officer Verification Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAOR, advises that, upon implementation of DOD Directive 1310.1 (Rank and Seniority of Commissioned Officers), effective 1 October 1996, all Reserve officers on the Reserve Active Status List in transition from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03901
In a letter dated 18 Jan 06 (Exhibit C), HQ AFPC/DPAMF2 requested the applicant explain why she felt she should have been awarded the grade of captain when she entered active duty. The time between her commissioning as a lLT in the Air Force Reserve on 2 Nov 78 and when she entered active duty on 10 Jan 79 is not active service nor creditable as active service for retirement. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Jan 06, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01189
HQ ARPC/DPB indicates they could not locate the promotion order that advanced him in grade to USAFR captain and advises that the requirements of the Air Force at the time of the USAF appointment dictated the grade in which the applicant could be appointed. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPO asserts neither the applicant’s record nor his submission supports his contention that he should have been promoted to captain when he entered active duty in 1951 and, if he...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02159
The applicant being an enlisted member at the time of his retirement was retired under the law that applies to Air Force enlisted members. While he did serve on active duty as a commissioned officer from 3 May 79 to 15 Aug 85, he was not entitled to retire as an officer because he had less than 10 years of active commissioned service as required by the applicable law. Applicant wants to know how someone can be retired as an officer and serve on active duty as an enlisted member.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068215C070402
He completed the Ordnance Corps Officer Candidate School (OCS) at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, and on 3 July 1943, was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army of the United States (AUS) Ordnance Corps and ordered to active duty at Headquarters, New York Port of Embarkation. On 14 April 1958, his file was reviewed at Headquarters, First United States Army (HQ, 1USA), for promotion to MAJ. His record shows : “Not Recommended” and “Not Fully Qualified” with the comment, “Has an...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01075
AFI 36-2606 states that the appeal authority for individuals like the applicant with more than 20 years of service would be his group commander. Based on HQ AFPC/DPPRRP’s advisory (Exhibit E), the group commander’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) contacted the HQ AFPC retirements section to advise that the group commander was going to complete the AF Form 418. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB advises the applicant was...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.