RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01172
INDEX CODE: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reinstated the In-Place Consecutive Overseas Tour (IPCOT) Travel
Entitlement.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is beyond the one year deadline window, based on the fact that he
was not presented with an Enlisted Overseas Returnee Counseling
Handout (EORCH) or any data concerning deadlines or deferments at the
time he applied for the IPCOT, 1 November 1995.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade
of staff sergeant.
Applicant was ordered on an IPCOT on 11 November 1996, thereby earning
an IPCOT leave travel entitlement. In accordance with Title 37, USC,
Section 411b, dated 5 December 1991, a member must utilize their
entitlement no more than one year after the date the member enters
into the new tour. The statute allows for an exception to the time
limit for duty performed in connection with a contingency operation.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Military Compensation & Legislation Division, HQ USAF/DPPC,
reviewed this application and states that while they are sympathetic
to applicant’s situation, they believe that the member has exhausted
any entitlement due to the time constraints in the law. Therefore,
they are unable to support the member’s request to reinstate the
entitlement to IPCOT leave travel.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 26 May 1998, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. Based on the applicant
not receiving the Enlisted Overseas Returnee Counseling Handout
(EROCH) or any deferment letters at the time he applied for the In-
Place Consecutive Overseas Tour (IPCOT) travel entitlement, we believe
his entitlement to IPCOT leave travel should be reinstated. In
accordance to the above, we recommend that his record be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that during the period 1
November 1997 through 1 January 1999, he performed duty in support of
a contingency operation.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 December 1998, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Edward C. Koenig, II , Member
Mr. Kenneth L. Reinertson, Member
Ms. Phyllis L. Spence, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Apr 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPC, dated 14 May 98.
Exhibit D. AFBCMR Letter, dated 26 May 98.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-01172
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that during the period 1
November 1997 through 1 January 1999, he performed duty in support of
a contingency operation.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01172 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated the In-Place Consecutive Overseas Tour (IPCOT) Travel Entitlement. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPC, dated 14 May 98. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-01172 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Compensation & Entitlements Branch, HQ USAF/DPRCC, reviewed this application and indicated that the statute in effect at the time the applicant entered his IPCOT (Section 411b, Title 37, United States Code (USC)) (5 Dec 91), states that, members and their eligible dependents must use their IPCOT leave within one year of entering the IPCOT. They do not recommend the Board correct applicant’s record to allow reimbursement for his dependents’ travel. THOMAS S....
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Legislation and Compensation Division, HQ AF/DPRC, reviewed this application and recommended denial since the applicant had ample time to initiate his Consecutive Overseas Tour (COT) leave travel entitlement. By the time the applicant was released from administrative hold, it was beyond the time limit to use his COT leave travel entitlement. MICHAEL P. HIGGINS Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-02957 MEMORANDUM...
Title 37, USC, Section 411b, does not provide the ability to allow members to take non-chargeable leave versus the travel entitlement. However, when he filed his travel voucher, he was advised that this was not an entitlement, and, with the exception of three authorized travel days, he was charged ordinary leave. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04027
Pinatubo erupted on 15 June 1991 and his family was evacuated from their off-base residence in the Philippines and transported back to the US. The applicant’s IPCOT entitlement lapsed in Oct 91, one year after he became first eligible. The applicant’s additional response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAA contends the applicant is requesting monetary compensation for the IPCOT...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015980
The applicant states, in effect, that his orders showed he was approved for COT free home travel; however, based on his follow-on assignments to Kuwait and Iraq, there was no availability to take the entitlement. This official recommended the applicant's PCS order to Fort Lee be amended to authorize COT free home travel in conjunction with COT under the provisions of Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), Paragraph U7200 and Army Regulation 614-30 (Overseas Service), paragraph 4-1c, for a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004225C070205
That office cited the Joint Federal Travel Regulation, Army Regulation 614- 30, and Department of the Army Message dated 26 February 1999 and opined that "serving in a position for two years and then permanent Change of Station (PCS) within the same theater and serving an additional two years for a total of 48 months (In most cases the equivalent of 2 all-others tours) does not meet the parameters of the COT (Consecutive Overseas Tour) Home Travel Program as defined." Eligible dependent is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05186
AFI 36-3003, Paragraph 14.4.3., states there is only one exception to the end of tour limitation, Members unable to use COT before completing the new tour due to duty in connection with contingency operations may defer travel until not more than 1-year after the completion of the duties precluding travel. Family medical conditions are not a basis on which the COT leave can be extended beyond the end of the second COT. While the applicant contends that a variety of circumstances precluded...
- The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or counsel.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00795
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00795 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dependent sons travel order be corrected to reflect Student Dependent Travel Order instead of In-Place- Consecutive-Overseas-Tour (IPCOT). When the applicant applied to have his son travel to the PDS under student dependent travel authorization, the dependent travel order associated with the IPCOT...