RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2000-02246
INDEX CODE: 110.02, 106.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to an
honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The offenses that she committed during her active duty military
service were inappropriate and ask for forgiveness. She accepts full
responsibility for her actions. The applicant states that the General
discharge she received has prevented her from providing for her family
and she has learned from her mistakes. She further states that she is
sorry for her past misconduct and hopes that the offenses she
committed while on active duty, will not be held against her for the
rest of her life. The applicant appeals to the board for clemency.
In support of her request, applicant provided a personal statement.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Although the applicant submitted a
statement expressing remorse of her misconduct, she did not submit any
new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the
discharge processing. She provided no other facts warranting an
upgrade of the discharge. The DPPRS evaluation is at attachment C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
22 Jan 03, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice to warrant an upgrade of her
discharge. After careful consideration of the available evidence, we
found no indication that the actions taken to effect her discharge
were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing
regulations in effect at the time, or that the actions taken against
the applicant were based on factors other than her own misconduct.
The only other basis upon which to upgrade her discharge would be
based on clemency. However, applicant has failed to provide
documentation pertaining to her post service activities. Should she
provide documentary evidence pertaining to her post service
activities, we would be willing to reconsider her appeal. Therefore,
based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which
to favorably consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2000-
02246 in Executive Session on 26 March 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Mrs.Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jan 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Jan 03.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02134
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02134 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry-level separation for fraudulent entry be changed to a medical discharge. Applicant states that she never needed the inhaler and did not suffer another attack until the present time. He affirms that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00104
He recommended a general discharge. The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of his general discharge to honorable on 12 June 1998. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099
In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his discharge are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02198
It appears that she is requesting administrative corrections be made to her medical records and discharge documents. She submitted a hardship letter requesting that she be assigned to a different location or separated so that she could later reenlist. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 03 for review...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03501
On 9 July 1986, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review board (AFDRB) requesting her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The board further concluded that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of the discharge. Based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we find no impropriety in the characterization of the applicant's discharge. Likewise, since we have determined favorable consideration of the applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade is not appropriate at this time, his request for his RE Code to be changed is not possible. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 26 March...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to enlist in the Air Force, or in the alternative, her RE code be waived to allow her enlistment in the Air Force. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03805
The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response to the Air Force evaluation, applicant reiterates her request to change her DOR to her original active duty date of 1 Jul 00 or in the alternative consideration for her time served in the Air Force Reserve. _____________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02844
The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...