RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03134
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His entry level discharge be changed to general and his Reentry (RE) Code
be changed to allow him to reenter service.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to his discharge are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that the
applicant’s uncharacterized character of service is correct. DPPRS states
that airmen are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service
characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of
continuous active service. DPPRS identified an error on his entry to
active duty date. On 18 October 2002, A DD Form 215 was sent to the
applicant advising him of this discrepancy. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation,
with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of
service” is correct. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 3
January 2003, for review and response. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence
of record, we find no impropriety in the characterization of the
applicant's discharge. It appears that responsible officials applied
appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find
persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that the
member was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of his
discharge. The only other basis upon which to upgrade his discharge would
be based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is
sufficient to establish that the applicant is, and has been, in good
standing for an extended period of time, thereby providing a basis for
relief on clemency. In view of the applicant’s age and apparent immaturity
at the time of his enlistment, we believe that should he continue in his
successful rehabilitation and provide evidence of a lengthy and established
pattern of good behavior, the Board would be willing to again consider his
request. Likewise, since we have determined favorable consideration of the
applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade is not appropriate at this
time, his request for his RE Code to be changed is not possible.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 26 March 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Mrs. Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket
Number 02-03134:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Sep 02 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Oct 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 23 Dec 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jan 03.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00056 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenter the Air Force. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected by deleting the words “and conduct” from his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to enlist in the Air Force, or in the alternative, her RE code be waived to allow her enlistment in the Air Force. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02511 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed so he may enlist in the Kansas Air National Guard. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the applicant separated 21 November 1995 after serving 2 months and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02903
He received an RE code of 2C, which defined means “Involuntary separation with honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant found that no change to applicant’s record was warranted. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE verified that the RE code of 2C was correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00007 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant requests that his “2C” reentry (RE) code, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to “3C,” “First Term airman not...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02510 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C to 1J so that he may serve in the Air National Guard. He was discharged on 21 Jul 00 and issued an RE code of "2C.". ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03621 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading his RE Code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02492
The applicant was discharged effective 21 May 2002 with an uncharacterized entry-level separation with a separation code JDA (fraudulent entry into military service) and a reentry code of 2C (entry level separation without characterization of service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE reviewed the applicant’s case file and concludes that the RE code of 2C is correct. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02198
It appears that she is requesting administrative corrections be made to her medical records and discharge documents. She submitted a hardship letter requesting that she be assigned to a different location or separated so that she could later reenlist. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 03 for review...
On 9 May 01, the applicant was notified that his commander was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for entry level performance and conduct. The RE code of 2C “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. However, if the Board feels administrative relief is appropriate, DPPAE recommends RE code 3K “Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR)...