RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02545
INDEX CODE 108.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be afforded the opportunity to appeal before a Physical Evaluation
Board (PEB) the decision to remove him from the Temporary Disability
Retirement List (TDRL).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After his evaluation in April, he was advised he was being removed
from the TDRL. He indicated he wanted to appear before the PEB and
appeal; however, the decision to remove him from the TDRL with
severance pay was already made.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the period in question, the applicant was an aircraft
maintenance journeyman with the 437th Aircraft Generation Squadron at
Charleston AFB, SC.
He was injured in April 2000 when the landing gear from a small plane
in which he was to deploy to Africa rolled across his foot and onto
his lower right leg, resulting in fracture-dislocation. Stability was
surgically restored to the foot; however, he was unable to return to
full duties due to persistent foot pain. Radiographic evaluation
revealed evidence of early degenerative changes in the mid foot. On 30
Oct, the MEB referred the case to an Informal PEB (IPEB). On 7 Nov 00,
the IPEB determined the applicant’s condition was not yet stable and
placed him on the TDRL with a 30% rating for severe right foot pain
secondary to traumatic fracture, right fibula and right foot status
post open reduction. The applicant concurred.
As result, the applicant was placed on the TDRL in the grade of senior
airman on 8 Jan 01 with a disability rating of 30%.
The applicant was evaluated on 25 Apr 02. Little change was found in
that the applicant continued to have pain with excessive activities
and was unable to run. He was working in a job that did not require a
significant amount of heavy labor or excessive walking. Prognosis was
continued gradual progression of degenerative changes likely with
time, perhaps necessitating further operative procedures for various
combinations of midfoot and hindfoot arthrodesis. Recommendation was
permanent separation due to inability to return to previous job
duties.
The IPEB convened on 7 Jun 02 and recommended the applicant be
discharged for status post traumatic right foot pain secondary to
arthritis with severance pay at 20%.
On 10 Jun 02, HQ AFPC/DPPDS advised the applicant of the above
recommendation and of his options to agree, disagree and request a
formal hearing, or disagree and submit a written rebuttal in lieu of a
formal hearing. A fact sheet was provided and the applicant was
requested to return his election in time to arrive at HQ AFPC/DPPDS no
later than 17 Jul 02. Apparently no response was received and, by
letter date 24 Jul 02, HQ AFPC/DPPD advised the applicant that he had
been removed from the TDRL and was to be discharged with severance
pay.
An undated memorandum for the record (MFR) indicated the applicant
called on 9 Aug 02 advising that in mid-July he had sent in his
nonconcurrence and request to appear before the Formal PEB (FPEB). The
MFR added that the revaluation disposition originally sent to him on
10 Jun 02 had a reply date of 15 Nov 00, which was obviously a
typographical error. The applicant had called in July about the
process to go to the FPEB and was told the reply date was a typo and
the actual reply date was 17 Jul 02. At that time, he apparently
indicated he was going to non-concur, however, no response was
received as of 24 Jul 02 and his case was finalized. He was advised to
submit an AFBCMR appeal.
On 13 Aug 02, the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged
for physical disability.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPD provided their rationale for recommending denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant asserts he returned the paperwork in the envelope he
received, indicating he did not concur with the recommended findings
and requesting an appearance before the FPEB. Based on the
typographical error in the response date [15 Nov 00], he had no idea
the paperwork would be filed on 24 Jul 02. When he returned from a
trip, he received a letter advising him he had been removed from the
TDRL. He immediately made inquiries and discovered his letter was
never received. He wants to appeal the decision because doctors have
advised him his foot will only get worse with time, and he is already
showing arthritic signs. He uses his retired military card to access
the base gym. A one-time severance pay is insufficient for an injury
that will worsen and cause him pain for the rest of his life.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration, we
believe the applicant may have been deprived of an opportunity to
fully present his medical condition for appropriate resolution. We
understand timely processing is stressed by DOD instruction. However,
we are aware of cases wherein the disability evaluation process for
some members was quite protracted on the part of the Air Force. As
such, there have been exceptions to the preferred 40-day resolution
criteria. The final outcome in this applicant’s case may still be
discharge with 20% severance pay. On the other hand, he may possibly
present evidence that could support continuation on the TDRL or a
higher disability rating. Therefore, we believe any doubt should be
resolved in this applicant’s favor by affording him the opportunity to
nonconcur with the IPEB’s recommendations and to continue the
disability evaluation process, and this we so recommend.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not removed from the Temporary Duty Retirement List
(TDRL) on 13 August 2002 and discharged for physical disability but on
that date was continued on the TDRL pending review and final
disposition by a FPEB.
b. Invitational travel orders be issued at the earliest
practicable date by competent authority for the purpose of evaluation
by a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB); that the results of the
evaluation be forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel
Council for further adjudication and the case be finalized in
accordance with AFI 36-3212 by the USAF Physical Disability Division
(HQ AFPC/DPPD); and that all charges for the physical examination be
waived.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 December 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
Mr. Charlie E. Williams, Jr., Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02545 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Aug 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 10 Sep 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Sep 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Oct 02, w/atchs.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-02545
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. He was not removed from the Temporary Duty Retirement
List (TDRL) on 13 August 2002 and discharged for physical disability
but on that date was continued on the TDRL pending review and final
disposition by a FPEB.
b. Invitational travel orders be issued at the earliest
practicable date by competent authority for the purpose of evaluation
by a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB); that the results of the
evaluation be forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel
Council for further adjudication and the case be finalized in
accordance with AFI 36-3212 by the USAF Physical Disability Division
(HQ AFPC/DPPD); and that all charges for the physical examination be,
and hereby are, waived.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02049
On 17 May 1996, the applicant’s case was forwarded to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) and they recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay with a 20 percent disability rating. The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) determines if the servicemember should be processed through the DES when a member is determined to be disqualified for continued military service. As noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, the time spent on the TDRL is not creditable...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03585A
_________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD states, in part, that the findings and recommendation of the FPEB along with the applicant’s rebuttal for a permanent retirement were forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for adjudication and SAFPC recommended that she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 60% rating. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and...
The results of his latest MRI show that he has more than degenerative arthritis. In a 30 Jan 98 TDRL evaluation, an orthopedic surgeon noted the applicant had continued symptoms after the operation with no improvement in either his back or leg pain. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his first letter, the applicant indicates he did agree with the findings of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00224
No other medical records are available for review between the time of his separation exam and his 7 Nov 02 hospitalization. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant indicates the applicant was diagnosed with his cancer one week after discharge. Although complete service medical records are not available for review, the Consultant believes the applicant would have been placed on medical hold and retained on active...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01206
Subsequent to being evaluated by the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) and Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB), the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of AFR 35-4 (Placed on Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)). Following a period of observation and treatment on TDRL status, he was permanently disability retired on 12 Jun 1986, with a disability rating of 40 percent for his condition and received pay in the grade of colonel, with over 26 years...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00371
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. Following DPPD’s assessment, they conclude the applicant was treated fairly throughout the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, that he was properly rated under federal disability guidelines at the time of his evaluation, and that he was afforded the opportunity for further review as provided by federal law and policy. As...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02368
However, several disabling conditions were deleted, without explanation and if they had been properly considered by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as required by law and regulation, he contends these additional unfitting conditions would have increased his total rating to be at least 30 percent and he would have been placed on the TDRL. The BCMR Medical Consultant concurs with the findings of the IPEB that the applicant’s conditions did not warrant a disability retirement or placement...
The applicant states that on 18 October 2001 she indicated her intent to submit an appeal to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) via the formal board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting her present request for further consideration by the AFPB while she is receiving her current 60% disability. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 01-03585 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
In the applicant’s case, the IPEB and FPEB during their evaluations both determined his condition as “May be Permanent.” The permanence determination of the applicant’s medical condition was based on the preponderance of medical evidence provided at the time of his medical evaluation. However, in our opinion, it appears that with proper rest and therapy, the applicant’s medical problem may have resolved itself within a reasonable period of time, he would have been able to return to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01514
On 3 Feb 11, the IPEB diagnosed the applicant with TOS, left upper extremity with a 60% compensable disability rating and disposition to retain on the TDRL. The complete PDBR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...