Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01106
Original file (BC-2002-01106.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01106

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His uncharacterized entry-level  separation  be  changed  to  a  general  or
honorable discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In the month  prior  to  his  discharge,  he  was  diagnosed  with  bi-polar
disorder and was medicated for the condition.  As such,  his  discharge  was
due to conditions that were out of his control.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 27 February 2001, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force  for  a
period of four years and entered active duty.

Based on the applicant’s professed suicide ideation,  he  was  seen  in  the
Life Skills Support  Center  at  ---  AFB,  ---,  on  13 August  2001.   The
licensed social worker and the psychiatrist agreed that  his  condition  was
so severe that it significantly impaired his  ability  to  function  in  the
military environment and he should be administratively discharged.   He  was
diagnosed with an adjustment disorder,  with  depressed  mood  and  suicidal
ideation.

On 23 August 2001, the commander notified the applicant  of  his  intent  to
recommend his entry level separation.  After consulting  with  counsel,  the
applicant waived his right to submit statements  on  his  own  behalf.   The
recommendation was approved by the discharge authority on 29 August 2001.

He was discharged on 6 September 2001, with an entry level separation,  with
uncharacterized service.  He completed  6  months  and  10  days  of  active
service.



During the processing of the application, AFPC/DPPAES  discovered  that  the
Reenlistment Eligibility  (RE)  code  of  2K  issued  at  the  time  of  the
applicant’s separation was incorrect and have administratively corrected  it
to reflect 2C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:

The BCMR  Medical  Consultant  recommends  the  application  be  denied  and
states, in part,  that  while  the  medical  circumstances  surrounding  the
applicant’s separation are limited by the absence  of  the  service  medical
record, the discharge legal review is clear on the  diagnosis  made  by  the
mental evaluation.  The applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment  disorder
with  depressed  mood  and  suicidal  ideation.   Since  this  condition  is
unsuiting  for  military  service,  the  applicant  underwent  entry   level
separation.  The  action  and  disposition  of  this  case  are  proper  and
equitable reflecting compliance with Air  Force  directives  that  implement
the law.

The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states,  in  part,  that
even though the applicant was on active duty after 180  days  of  continuous
active service, the process of his discharge  began  before  that  point  in
time.  Therefore, the separation policy  recognized  it  as  an  entry-level
separation.

The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  6
September 2002 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the  evidence
of record and applicant’s submission,  we  are  not  persuaded  that  relief
should be granted.  Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however,  we  do
not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive  to
override the rationale provided by the Air Force.  The  offices  of  primary
responsibility have adequately  addressed  applicant’s  contentions  and  we
agree with their opinions and adopt the rationale  expressed  as  the  basis
for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain  his  burden  that
he has suffered either  an  error  or  an  injustice.   Hence,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  Docket  Number  02-01106  in
Executive Session on 12 November 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
                       Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
                       Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Mar 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 13 May 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 26 Aug 02.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Sep 02.




                                   PEGGY E. GORDON
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03652

    Original file (BC-2001-03652.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request for clarification regarding whether a change of the narrative reason for discharge currently listed as personality disorder is justified, the AFBCMR Medical Consultant provided the following advisory...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03481

    Original file (BC-2002-03481.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03481 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from Mental Disorder to Medical. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) reflects Mental Disorder as the narrative reason for separation. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200231

    Original file (0200231.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00231 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: a. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant's request and states that he was separated from the Air Force based on a diagnosis of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03983

    Original file (BC-2002-03983.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03983 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and separation code be changed. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS concurs with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and recommends the applicant’s separation code...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03011

    Original file (BC-2002-03011.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03011 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. DoD has determined that it would be unfair to the applicant and the service if the limited service of the airman were characterized. (Exhibit D) HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms that the RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03011

    Original file (BC-2002-03011.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03011 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. DoD has determined that it would be unfair to the applicant and the service if the limited service of the airman were characterized. (Exhibit D) HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms that the RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200274

    Original file (0200274.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was discharged on 18 February 1999, after 6 months on active duty and after being identified with an adjustment disorder. He indicated that the applicant had an adjustment disorder with personality traits that interfered with his military duties/training and was the cause of his discharge. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01742

    Original file (BC-2003-01742.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A follow-up evaluation on 19 September 1996 rendered a diagnosis of major depression vs. dysthymia and she was treated with the antidepressant medicine Prozac. The applicant’s history of recurrent major depression requiring hospitalization was clearly disqualifying for continued active duty. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01981

    Original file (BC-2002-01981.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01981 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Additionally, she provided no facts warranting a change...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03570

    Original file (BC-2002-03570.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03570 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reason for his discharge be changed to honorable. On 20 September 2002, while enrolled in technical training, applicant was notified by his commander that in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airman (personality disorder),...