Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00733
Original file (BC-2002-00733.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00733
            INDEX CODE:  137.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be reimbursed for premiums paid on his Servicemembers’  Group  Life
Insurance (SGLI).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He declined SGLI coverage when he first enlisted.  He has been charged
the full amount ever since.

In  support  of  the  appeal,   applicant   submits   a   SGLV   8286,
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate, dated 7
July 2000, declining coverage.  Applicant’s complete submission,  with
attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on  1  February  2001.
He is currently serving in the grade of airman first class.

On 7 July 2000, applicant signed a SGLV 8286 stating that he does  not
want insurance at this time.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW  states  that   they   needed   additional   information   to
sufficiently   evaluate   his   claim   and   make   an    appropriate
recommendation.  On 22 March 2002 they  sent  a  letter  to  applicant
requesting the  addidtional  information.   They  did  not  receive  a
response.   Therefore,  they  recommend  disapproval  of   applicant’s
request.  A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:-

On 19 July 2002, a complete copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

 2. The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  our  conclusion  that  the
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or   injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application  on  12
December 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Edward Parker, Member
                 Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:





   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 1 Jul 02.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Jul 02.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03442

    Original file (BC-2001-03442.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 April 2002, the applicant provided additional information, with attachments, to support her appeal. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW stated that the applicant was erroneously charged for SGLI for the period of 20 Feb 98 to 31 Mar 01. In their opinion,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102059A

    Original file (0102059A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, they recommend the Board approve applicant’s request and authorize reimbursement of all overcharged premiums effective 1 July 2001 and disapprove reimbursement of all charged premiums from 1 April 2001 through 30 June 2001. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 April 2002 for review and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02700

    Original file (BC-2002-02700.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2002-02700 in Executive Session on 15 April 2003, under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201462

    Original file (0201462.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 February 2002, the applicant completed a new SGLV 8286 declining coverage _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommended denial. It is their opinion that the Aviano AB leadership took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of the increase in coverage and that the applicant had adequate time during the month of April 2001 to make a new election and avoid the increased premium. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00947

    Original file (BC-2002-00947.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 April 1999, applicant signed a SGLV 8286 stating that she does not want insurance at this time. On 18 April 2002 they sent a letter to applicant requesting the additional information. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application on 12 December 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Edward Parker, Member Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Member The following documentary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200193

    Original file (0200193.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant did not complete a new SGLV 8286 declining coverage until 30 November 2001. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that it is noted that notification of the SGLI reenactment was posted in their base newspaper. He further states that if the period of 1 April–30 November 2001 is disapproved for reimbursement he request that the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103488

    Original file (0103488.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In April 1999, he discovered that he was enrolled and charged for SGLI coverage, even though he had other insurance coverage with another company, and declined SGLI coverage in January 1999. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR Docket Number 01-03488 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01908

    Original file (BC-2002-01908.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Effective 1 April 2001, Public Law 106-419, automatically increased the level of SGLI coverage to $250,000 for all military members, until the members could elect reduced coverage or no coverage, regardless of any prior election. The AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states, in part, that Kirtland AFB leadership did not advise that if you had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02563

    Original file (BC-2002-02563.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Members who had elected no coverage or less than $250,000 coverage prior to 1 April 2001, could avoid the higher premiums provided they completed a new election form in April 2001. No evidence has been submitted showing that the applicant declined coverage during the month of April 2001. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102154

    Original file (0102154.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW indicated that Section 312 of Public Law 106-419, 1 Nov 00, automatically increased the level of SGLI coverage for all eligible military members from $200,000 to $250,000 effective 1 Apr 01. Members who failed to complete a new SGLV 8286 during the month of Apr 01 to elect a lower amount of coverage or “no coverage” were automatically covered for $250,000 in accordance with public law. It is...