Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02700
Original file (BC-2002-02700.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-02700
                       INDEX CODE:  100.00

      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  None

      SSN        HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He  be  refunded  the  Servicemember’s  Group  Life  Insurance  (SGLI)
premiums deducted 1 April through 31 December 2001.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 12 May 1997, he cancelled his SGLI coverage in favor of  a  private
life insurance plan.  On 1 April 2001 SGLI premiums were deducted from
his pay without his consent.  He did  not  receive  guidance  on  this
until late 2001.  On 13 December 2001 he submitted  a  Servicemember’s
Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate form to stop any further
deductions of premiums.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Section 312 of Public Law  106-419,  1  November  2000,  automatically
increased the level of SGLI coverage for all eligible military members
from $200,000  to  $250,000  effective  1  April  2001.   Implementing
guidance dated 12 March 2001 stipulated that members eligible for SGLI
on 31 March 2001 with continued eligibility on 1 April 2001 would have
their SGLI increased to $250,000 effective 1 April 2001, regardless of
any prior election.  Members who  had   elected  less   than  $250,000
coverage  prior to 1  April  2001  could  avoid  any  higher  premiums
provided they completed a new SGLV 8286 in April 2001 to retain  their
previously elected coverage.

The applicant submitted SGLV 8286 on 12 May 1997 and 13 December  2001
declining SGLI coverage.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPW requested the applicant provide copies of  his  leave  and
earnings statements.  Applicant did not respond within the  prescribed
time-frame.  On 16 September 2002,  AFPC/DPW  notified  the  applicant
that they were  unable  to  process  his  request  without  additional
documentation.  DPW recommends the requested relief be denied.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments,  is  at
Exhibit C.

______________ __________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
27 November 2002, for review  and  response.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  our  conclusion  that  the
applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support  his  claim.
On 16 September 2002, AFPC/DPW forwarded a  letter  to  the  applicant
requesting additional documentation to process his case  (i.e.,  leave
and earnings statements and any other  documentation  to  support  his
claim).  The applicant did not respond.  Therefore, in the absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrates the existence of an  error  or  an  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2002-02700 in Executive Session on 15 April 2003, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

                  Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                  Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
                  Mr. Edward Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPW, 19 Nov 02, w/atch.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Nov 02.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02700A

    Original file (BC-2002-02700A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request to be reimbursed for his SGLI premiums was considered and denied by the Board on 15 April 2003. Lackland AFB notified its servicemembers of the pending change to SGLI coverage by using the base bulletins, newspapers, and the April 2001 pay statements. It would appear that he was notified of the SGLI increase and we find no evidence to support his miscounseling contention.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102059A

    Original file (0102059A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, they recommend the Board approve applicant’s request and authorize reimbursement of all overcharged premiums effective 1 July 2001 and disapprove reimbursement of all charged premiums from 1 April 2001 through 30 June 2001. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 April 2002 for review and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03442

    Original file (BC-2001-03442.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 April 2002, the applicant provided additional information, with attachments, to support her appeal. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW stated that the applicant was erroneously charged for SGLI for the period of 20 Feb 98 to 31 Mar 01. In their opinion,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201462

    Original file (0201462.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 February 2002, the applicant completed a new SGLV 8286 declining coverage _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommended denial. It is their opinion that the Aviano AB leadership took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of the increase in coverage and that the applicant had adequate time during the month of April 2001 to make a new election and avoid the increased premium. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200193

    Original file (0200193.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant did not complete a new SGLV 8286 declining coverage until 30 November 2001. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that it is noted that notification of the SGLI reenactment was posted in their base newspaper. He further states that if the period of 1 April–30 November 2001 is disapproved for reimbursement he request that the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00860

    Original file (BC-2003-00860.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: SGLI premiums for the $250,000 coverage have been taken out since August 2000 until March 2003, while his records reflect $100,000 coverage since August 2000. It is their opinion that the applicant’s Air Force base leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of the increase in coverage and that the applicant had adequate time during the month of April 01 to make a new election and avoid the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102154

    Original file (0102154.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW indicated that Section 312 of Public Law 106-419, 1 Nov 00, automatically increased the level of SGLI coverage for all eligible military members from $200,000 to $250,000 effective 1 Apr 01. Members who failed to complete a new SGLV 8286 during the month of Apr 01 to elect a lower amount of coverage or “no coverage” were automatically covered for $250,000 in accordance with public law. It is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103488

    Original file (0103488.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In April 1999, he discovered that he was enrolled and charged for SGLI coverage, even though he had other insurance coverage with another company, and declined SGLI coverage in January 1999. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR Docket Number 01-03488 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03454

    Original file (BC-2002-03454.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate, dated 9 July 1999; AFPC/DPW letter, dated 19 November 2002; and several copies of his leave and earning statements before and after SGLI deductions. DPW requested a copy of his SGLI certificate declining coverage, TDY orders, and any other pertinent documentation to support his claim. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00349

    Original file (BC-2003-00349.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that when she declined the SGLI coverage on 19 March 2001 she was aware of the increase that would be in effect on April 2001. The MPF technician informed her that since she was declining coverage so close to the new coverage, it would not be...