Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00555
Original file (BC-2002-00555.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00555

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to enroll in  the  Reserve  Component  Survivor  Benefit  Plan
(RCSBP).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

At the time he received the RCSBP election package he did not  know  whether
he was going to retire or not.  He also did not  realize  that  it  was  the
only time that he could make an election.

The applicant states that the Reserves do not give a retirement briefing  or
give any information on what needs to be done prior  to  retiring  like  the
active duty does.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts  pertaining  to  this  application,  extracted  from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter  prepared  by  the
appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that  the
applicant failed to make an election when he was initially eligible  in  May
2000, and will have another opportunity to make an election at age 60.   The
applicant was notified of his eligibility to participate  in  the  RCSBP  by
certified mail.  Prior to 1 January 2001, a  member  who  did  not  make  an
election by  the  end  of  the  90-day  suspense  period  was  automatically
enrolled in Option A (Deferred Election).

The ARPC/DPS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 12 April 2002 for review and response within 30  days.   However,  as  of
this date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the  evidence
of record and applicant’s submission,  we  are  not  persuaded  that  relief
should be granted.  Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however,  we  do
not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive  to
override the rationale provided by the Air Force.   The  office  of  primary
responsibility has  adequately  addressed  applicant’s  contentions  and  we
agree with their opinion and we adopt the rationale expressed as  the  basis
for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain  his  burden  that
he has suffered either  an  error  or  an  injustice.   Hence,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  Docket  Number  02-00555  in
Executive Session on 16 August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                  Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Chair
                  Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
                  Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Feb 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPS, dated 25 Mar 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Apr 02.




             BARBARA A. WESTGATE
             Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201470

    Original file (0201470.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did not make an election during open enrollment season because he thought he already had coverage under the election he made in 1994. The Board notes the applicant did not elect RCSBP coverage within the required timeframe and was automatically enrolled under Option A. The applicant was notified on two occasions of his eligibility to enroll in RCSBP but did not elect coverage either time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00516

    Original file (BC-2002-00516.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPS states that both election packages were mailed to the address he had on file and neither was returned because of an erroneous address. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200516

    Original file (0200516.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPS states that both election packages were mailed to the address he had on file and neither was returned because of an erroneous address. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200387

    Original file (0200387.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he elected Option C (Immediate Annuity), spouse and children, under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The ARPC/DPS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103633

    Original file (0103633.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ARPC/DPS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 February 2002 for review and response within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200727

    Original file (0200727.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00727 INDEX CODE 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband's records be corrected so that she may be eligible for a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. She feels she is entitled to any and all benefits regarding her spouse, as this is what he would have chosen had he not been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200918

    Original file (0200918.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201652

    Original file (0201652.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01652

    Original file (BC-2002-01652.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200602

    Original file (0200602.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00602 INDEX CODE: 137.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to show he declined coverage in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...