Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202373
Original file (0202373.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02373
            INDEX CODE:  131.09

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her records  be  corrected  to  reflect  promotion  to  the  grade  of
technical sergeant.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter  prepared  by  the  appropriate  office  of  the   Air   Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record  of
Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ  ARPC/DPB  reviewed  this  application  and   recommended   denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 6 Sep
02 for review and response.  As of this date,  no  response  has  been
received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After careful  consideration  of
applicant's request and the available  evidence  of  record,  we  find
insufficient evidence of error  or  injustice  to  warrant  corrective
action.  The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion  appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not  been  rebutted  by
applicant.  Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights  to
which  entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not   followed,   or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no  basis  to  disturb
the existing record.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02373 in Executive Session on 15 Oct 02, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Marcia Jane Bachman, Member
      Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 27 Aug 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Sep 02.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202026

    Original file (0202026.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter recommending the accelerated promotion requested a DOR of 15 Sep 99. It is further recommended that he be considered for promotion by a Special Review Board (SRB) and that his record be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the FY03 Line and Nonline Colonel Selection Board, which convened in October 2002; if he is recommended for promotion by a Special Review Board, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records be advised...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03036

    Original file (BC-2004-03036.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the attached Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709, prepared for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Selection Board, was accepted for file on 22 April 2004. It is further recommended that her record, to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02656

    Original file (BC-2004-02656.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the attached AF Form 709, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), prepared for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Selection Board, was accepted for file on 21 April 2004. It is further recommended that his record, to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02310

    Original file (BC-2003-02310.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 12 Aug 02, the 9 AETF commander determined the Article 15 would be filed in the applicant’s officer selection record (OSR). On 11 Sep 02, the applicant was notified that the 21 SW commander at Peterson AFB was recommending the applicant’s name be removed from the promotion list.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02866

    Original file (BC-2002-02866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the ARPC/DPB evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response indicating that as a result of administrative corrections to his position, he now has all the requirements to meet a position vacancy board: time in grade, a valid lieutenant colonel position, and the intent to nominate. Based on the assumption that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01179

    Original file (BC-2005-01179.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01179 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) prepared on him for the FY04 and FY05 Major Line and Health Professions Promotion Boards be corrected to reflect accurate information in the Assignment...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03148

    Original file (BC-2003-03148.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ARPC notified her that she was not qualified because she had mistakenly been enrolled in and completed the Senior Non-Commissioned Officer Academy (SNCOA) course instead of the required NCOA and was referred to the ARPC Promotions Section. The confusion concerning promotion with completion of SNCOA is based on an exception listed in Table 4.2, Note 8, which states: “Do not promote an enlisted member to MSgt unless they complete NCOA. After completing the course, she was told more than once...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00701

    Original file (BC-2004-00701.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00701 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a special selection board (SSB) for the FY04 Line and Health Professions Lt Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Selection Board with her Officer Performance Report (OPR)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02210

    Original file (BC-2003-02210.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    While he was a Deputy Commander at the time the PRF was written, he was actually the IG when the promotion board met. Selection board members use the "whole person" concept when evaluating an officer for promotion to the next higher grade. We note that the OSB that was prepared for the selection board accurately reflected his completion of Air War College.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01320

    Original file (BC-2005-01320.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the effective date of his promotion to lieutenant colonel was delayed to 11 Sep 01, his date of rank (DOR) was back-dated to 6 Jun 01, within the OPR reporting period. The applicant contends that his nonselection for promotion to colonel by the FY05 colonel selection board was due to the fact his record as it met the board, only contained one OPR reflecting service in the grade of lieutenant colonel. After careful review of the applicant's submission and the available evidence of...