RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01377
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His military records be reviewed by the Secretary of the Air Force
(SAF) and Secretary of Defense (SecDef) for consideration of the
award of the Joint Specialty Officer (JSO) designation.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In September 2001, the Air Force convened a JSO selection board in
which his records were not submitted for consideration. He had
completed a full joint duty assignment at Headquarters United
States European Command. He was in a joint billet, with more that
36 months of uninterrupted service and he had completed the
prescribed professional military education (PME) and joint PME. It
is his desire to at least be considered. He was told by an action
officer at the Colonel’s Group that he probably would have been
selected for JSO had his records been submitted to SAF. He is
currently assigned in a JSO Critical billet at Defense Threat
Reduction Agency (DTRA).
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a senior officer
personnel brief and a certificate of completion from the Armed
Forces Staff College.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Air Force Senior Leader Management Office reviewed this
application and recommended the applicant be informed that his
record was not missed at the September 2001 Joint Specialty Officer
(JSO) Board. He was not eligible for board consideration, although
this does not prevent him from being eligible to meet future JSO
Boards. Based on the JSO inventory and projected requirements, the
Air Force Colonel Matters Office (AFCMO), in conjunction with
AFPC’s Joint Management Office (JMO), only considered 32
colonels/colonel selects at the 2001 JSO board. The Air Force
Specialty Codes (AFSCs) considered were 14N and 33S; the applicant
was/is a 21L. In addition, they have no record of a conversation
between the applicant and an AO stating the applicant probably
would have been selected had his record been submitted.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant addressed each of the findings of the evaluation and
explained why his record still deserves to be reviewed and
considered by the JSO Board, effective with the previous board. He
restated his initial explanations as to the telephone conversation
with AFCMO in more detail.
Secondly, it is his understanding the Air Force only submitted 14N
and 32S AFSCs for consideration and that he was not considered
since he is in AFSC 21L and there are a sufficient number in the
JSO roster. He says apparently the AFCMO position was not to
consider other AFSCs based on projected needs rather than on a case-
by-case examination of skills. However, that may not have
necessarily been a totally accurate position to take. As in his
case, his experience cuts across multiple AFSCs and critical
skills.
Lastly, he was placed in a position which was reflected at the time
of assignment as a JSO critical billet. He was told by AFCMO that
a JCS waiver was required since his billet was coded as a JSO
position. He says a waiver would not have been required if he was
considered and selected by the board.
Additionally, he meets the requirement for JSO and based on AFPC
and AFCMO web page, there is no quota or selection rate for JSO.
Applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
AFBCMR Docket Number 02-01377 in Executive Session on 25 June 2002,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFSLMO, dated 1 May 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 6 Jun 02, w/atchs.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00284
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00284 INDEX CODE: 100.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by the Calendar Year 2005 (CY05) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Continuation Board with a Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) of 14N4 (Intelligence) rather than...
Applicant was considered, but not selected for promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY00A colonel’s board. Several of the applicant’s attachments stated that “AFSC is an assignment related course not PME, per se.” The applicant acknowledged that although AFSC was not displayed on his OSB, there was a training report filed in his officer selection record (OSR) verifying his successful completion of AFSC. Removal of JPME II from the OSBs alleviated the perception among joint officers...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03393
A health professions officer nominated for PV promotion must complete their PME by the PRF submission date, 45 days before the board convenes. We note that apparently in accordance with the established governing policy, the applicant’s nomination for a PV promotion was returned because she had not completed the appropriate level of professional military education (PME) at the time the PRF was submitted. In this respect, the Board notes that a health professions officer nominated for PV...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01376 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 111.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the CY99B (P0599B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be replaced with the reaccomplished PRF provided. Although the incorrect statement was on the contested PRF, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01518A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01518 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s appeal for reconsideration, he again asks that he be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the Calendar Year 2001A (CY01A) and CY01B Central Colonel Selection Boards with the...
The most current duty assignment entry on the CY99A OSB was changed to “16 Jul 99, Deputy Chief, Combat Forces Division.” (A copy of the corrected Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY99A SSB is provided as an attachment to Exhibit C.) The applicant was not selected by the SSBs. A complete copy of his response, with 8 attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Assignment Procedures &...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05744
DPSI recommends the Board direct the applicants record be corrected to show that any and all references to his medical condition and the withholding of information about his medical condition be removed from paragraph 3B and 3C of the updated Training Eliminee letter received by AFPC/DPSIP on 6 Nov 12 and Section 4 of the AETC Form 125A, Record of Administrative Action, dated 27 Apr 12. Although the OPR recommends the applicants record be considered for reclassification and retention by...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02441
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02441 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: EUGENE R. FIDELL XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JANUARY 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected by removing the references to her excessive work on her Calendar Year (CY) 02B (2 Dec 02) (P0602B) Colonel Central Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02441
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02441 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: EUGENE R. FIDELL XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JANUARY 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected by removing the references to her excessive work on her Calendar Year (CY) 02B (2 Dec 02) (P0602B) Colonel Central Selection...
INDEX CODE: 102.05, 131.09 AFBCMR 02-02989 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...