RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00774
INDEX NUMBER: 115.01 121.03
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Aviation Service Date (ASD) of 26 May 88 he was given after
transferring from the Navy to the Air Force be changed to 14 Dec
87, the date he had before the transfer.
43.5 days of accrued leave be restored to his current leave
account.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His ASD as indicated on his statement of service with the Navy was
14 Dec 87. When he spoke to personnel in AFPC/DPAOY, Rated
Analysis/rated Management, they had no Air Force Instruction that
justifies the change in his ASD from 14 Dec 87 to 26 May 88.
He was not credited with the 43.5 days of accrued leave he had upon
transfer from the Navy to the Air Force in accordance with AFI 36-
2004, Interservice Transfer of Officers on the Active Duty List to
the United States Air Force.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is presently serving on active duty in the Air Force
in the grade of major. He transferred from the Navy to the Air
Force on 22 Dec 2001. In addition to the requests indicated above,
the applicant had also requested that his Entered Active Duty (EAD)
date and his Officer Service Date (OSD) be corrected. The Air
Force has administratively corrected the applicant’s EAD and OSD.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAOR advised that the applicant’s EAD has been established
as 22 Dec 01, his pay date as 14 Dec 87, and his Total Active
Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) as 14 Dec 87.
The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSFM recommends that 43.5 days be restored to the applicant’s
current leave account.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPAOY recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change
his ASD from 26 May 88 to 14 Dec 87. Based on the guidance
contained in AFI 11-402, para 3.11.1.1, the ASD is established
based on the class starting date in the program flying training
document. For the Naval program this date is the Primary Phase of
Training Report Date, which is recorded on an individual’s Naval
Aviator Aviation Training Jacket Summary Card (CNATRA form 1542).
This date on the applicant’s CNATRA Form 1542 is 26 May 88.
The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluation by restating
the corrections to his records he is requesting. In regards to the
CNATRA Form 1542 that has been used to determine his ASD, he states
that the form is an unsigned document that he provided to
AFPC/DPAOY based on their request. The 26 May 88 date that
AFPC/DPAOY recognizes as his ASD does not reflect the actual date
he began training leading to an aeronautical rating. The applicant
provides copies of other documents, including his first Navy Leave
and Earning Statement, that show his Aviation Commission Date as
14 Dec 87. He also provides copies of his Navy LESs that show his
previous entitlement to Aviation Career Incentive Pay (ACIP).
The applicant provides extracts from pertinent Air Force
Instructions that he believes supports his entitlement to ACIP and
his contention that his ASD is 14 Dec 87. He requests that the
Board grant him ACIP with interest from the date he entered the Air
Force and grant him entrance into the Aviation Continuation Pay
bonus program effective 22 Dec 01 with interest.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit G.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice regarding the applicant’s
request to change his Aviation Service Date. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. We note that while the Air Force Aviation Service
Date differs from the applicant’s equivalent Navy date, all available
evidence indicates that his Navy date is incorrect. It would be
improper for the Air Force to knowingly award the applicant an Aviation
Service Date not computed according to the rules and regulations that
would apply in any other similar case. Therefore, we find no basis to
recommend granting relief in this part of the applicant’s appeal.
4. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request to
restore 43.5 days to his current leave account. We accept the
determination and recommendation from the Air Force that the
applicant’s leave account should be corrected to restore these days.
We also note that, with the exception of his Aviation Service Date, all
of the other requests by the applicant have been administratively
corrected.
5. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore,
the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that forty-three and one-
half (43.5) days of leave were added to his account commencing 2
October 2001.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00774 in
Executive Session on 19 June 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
Mr. Thomas J, Topolski, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Mar 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAOR, dated 21 Mar 02,
w/atch 1, atch 2 wd.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 11 Apr 02,
w/atch.
Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPAOY, dated 15 Apr 02,
w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 26 Apr 02.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 20 May 02,
w/atchs.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicated that the first and only notification he received regarding adding UPT gate months was AFPC’s Jul 95 letter. As a result of the policy change, the applicant had his records adjusted and fell one month short of his third gate under the ACIA of 1974. Prior to the policy change, the applicant fell 11 months short of his third gate credit.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03434
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. AETC/DOF complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAO recommended no change to the applicant’s record and stated since the applicant was selected by his commission source for JSUNT and was subsequently eliminated for academic deficiency, that it would be in the best interest of the Air Force to deny the applicant’s request to apply to the active duty selection board for pilot or JSUNT training. Applicant’s complete...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 93-02678 INDEX NUMBER: 111.01, 111.05 COUNSEL: GEORGE E. DAY HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AFBCMR’s findings of 7 October 1996 ordering him to Extended Active Duty (EAD) and Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) be amended to include direction that his date of rank (DOR) to the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-02678A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 93-02678 INDEX NUMBER: 111.01, 111.05 COUNSEL: GEORGE E. DAY HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AFBCMR’s findings of 7 October 1996 ordering him to Extended Active Duty (EAD) and Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) be amended to include direction that his date of rank (DOR) to the grade of...
The total agreement payment amount is divided by the total length of the agreement in days (360 days per year) to arrive at a “daily rate.” This daily rate is then multiplied by the number of days served under the agreement to arrive at the amount of ACP the member has “earned.” Based on the “daily rate,” members receive the annual payment at the beginning of the agreement year with the member “earning” the payment over the course of the year. A complete copy of the DFAS-POCC/DE evaluation...
On 9 Apr 97, the Board recommended he be considered by an FEB to determine his qualification for aviation service and that the results of the FEB be forwarded to the Commander, AETC, for final determination of his qualification for aviation service. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings, with a corrected directive, is attached at Exhibit C. On 5 Feb 98, a second FEB was convened to consider evidence concerning applicant’s professional qualifications, specifically lack of judgment and...
Another individual's (Lt Col S---‘s) ACP agreement was faxed after his agreement and that individual received his payment on 29 Dec 99. The fact that he was not paid during 1999 was caused by his 27 day delay in signing the agreement from program inception; the massive volume of agreements that were being processed; the government closures from the holidays and the Y2K computer issues; and, different payment dates at Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) (see Exhibit B). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01731
AFPC/DPAOY indicated that following a thorough review of the applicant’s request, the findings and recommendations of the office of the Air Force Inspector General, Air Force Rated Force Policy, and the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, they find no further information to support this request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
6000.13, dated 30 Jun 97, should be used to determine his DOR. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, the record should be corrected to show that the applicant was appointed into the Air Force Nurse Corps effective 30 Jun 97. A complete copy of the DPPAOR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00224
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00224 INDEX NUMBER: 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to retain the date of rank (DOR), 1 May 94, of his promotion to staff sergeant (SSgt) while in the Air Force Reserve. On 17 Aug 93, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...