RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00445
INDEX NUMBER: 100.07
XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The date he was upgraded to the five skill level be changed to reflect
a date between 20 Dec 00 and 31 Mar 01, which would make him eligible
to test for promotion to staff sergeant during the 01E5 cycle.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He completed all requirements for award of his five skill level on 20
Dec 00.
The date of his upgrade to the five skill level, 3 Apr 01, is unfair
and made him ineligible to test during cycle 01E5.
The applicant provides a copy of an e-mail from his unit training
manager at his old duty station to his new duty station that states the
only thing needed to complete upgrade action on the applicant when he
departed was the score from his Career Development Test (CDC), which
the applicant took on 20 Dec 00.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a senior airman serving on active duty. His Total
Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 22 Jan 98. The four
reports the applicant has received since entering the Air Force all
reflect overall ratings of “5.”
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the evaluations prepared by the appropriate offices of the
Air Force found at Exhibits C and D.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAT recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Applicable
directives establish the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD) as 31
March of each year. The applicant was not upgraded until 3 April 2001
and is therefore not eligible.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPPWB defers to the recommendation of AFPC/DPPAT. If, however,
the Board determines the member should have been upgraded 31 March 2001
or earlier, he will be entitled to supplemental consideration for the
01E5 cycle, provided he is otherwise eligible and recommended by his
commander.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluations by providing a
letter from his current commander confirming that the applicant had
completed all requirements for upgrade to the five-skill level prior to
the 31 Mar 01 PECD. He states that the applicant was not upgraded in
time due to oversights in the system both at his losing base, Araxos
Air Base, and his new base, Seymour Johnson AFB. He requests that the
Board adjust the applicant’s upgrade date to 31 Mar 01.
The complete response is at Exhibit F.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The evidence of record clearly
indicates that the applicant completed all requirements for upgrade to
the five-skill level prior to 31 Mar 01. In fact, the period of time
from the completion of his CDC test, 20 Dec 00, until his upgrade on
3 Apr 01 appears excessive and is not explained or justified in the Air
Force advisory. There is compelling reason to believe that the closure
of Araxos Air Base resulted in the failure to correctly and timely
process the applicant’s records. Therefore, in the interest of equity
and justice, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as
indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was upgraded to the
five-skill level on 31 March 2001 vice 3 April 2001.
It is further recommended that he be provided supplemental
consideration for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5)
beginning with cycle 01E5.
If selected for promotion to staff sergeant by supplemental
consideration, he be provided any additional supplemental
consideration required as a result of that selection.
If AFPC discovers any adverse factors during or subsequent to
supplemental consideration that are separate and apart, and
unrelated to the issues involved in this application that would
have rendered the applicant ineligible for the promotion, such
information will be documented and presented to the Board for a
final determination on the individual’s qualifications for the
promotion.
If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection for
promotion to the higher grade, immediately after such promotion the
records shall be corrected to show that he was promoted to the higher
grade on the date of rank established by the supplemental promotion and
that he is entitled to all pay, allowances, and benefits of such grade
as of that date.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00445 in
Executive Session on 24 April 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Nov 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAT, dated 26 Feb 02.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 13 Mar 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 22 Mar 02.
Exhibit F. Memorandum, 4SFS/CC, undated.
PHILIP SHEUERMAN
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-00445
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXX, 592-03-3739, be corrected to show that he was
upgraded to the five-skill level on 31 March 2001 vice 3 April 2001.
It is further directed that he be provided supplemental
consideration for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5)
beginning with cycle 01E5.
If selected for promotion to staff sergeant by supplemental
consideration, he be provided any additional supplemental
consideration required as a result of that selection.
If AFPC discovers any adverse factors during or subsequent to
supplemental consideration that are separate and apart, and unrelated
to the issues involved in this application that would have rendered
the applicant ineligible for the promotion, such information will be
documented and presented to the Board for a final determination on the
individual’s qualifications for the promotion.
If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection
for promotion to the higher grade, immediately after such promotion
the records shall be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
higher grade on the date of rank established by the supplemental
promotion and that he is entitled to all pay, allowances, and benefits
of such grade as of that date.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02076 INDEX CODE: 111.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 13 July 1999 through 31 May 2000, be removed from his records and he be provided supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) for the 01E5...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02650
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02650 INDEX NUMBER: 126.00 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of senior airman (E-4) lost as a result of an Article 15 action be restored with a date of rank (DOR) of 20 Jan 02. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03367
Members of the Board, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Ms. Martha Maust, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis considered this application on 2 March 2004. Ltr, AFPC/DPPPWB, dtd 26 Jan 04 AFBCMR BC-2003-03367 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 110.03, 128.00, 131.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicant makes no contentions on his application; however, he provided letters of support from the rater and additional rater of the report in question. Should the Board replace the report as requested (with the upgrade of the overall rating of “5”), providing he is otherwise eligible, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration beginning with cycle 01E5. A complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01993
The applicant contends that the 1 Mar 01 closeout date was an administrative error and that the correct closeout date should have been 1 Apr 00. Had the medal been considered, he would have been selected for promotion. The applicant requested supplemental promotion consideration and his request was denied because resubmission of the AFCM was initiated after the date selections were made for the 01E6 cycle, 31 May 2001.
The applicant contends that the 1 Mar 01 closeout date was an administrative error and that the correct closeout date should have been 1 Apr 00. Had the medal been considered, he would have been selected for promotion. The applicant requested supplemental promotion consideration and his request was denied because resubmission of the AFCM was initiated after the date selections were made for the 01E6 cycle, 31 May 2001.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00839
The applicant appealed the contested report under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluations Reports. The first time he was considered was in cycle 01E5. He was considered again for promotion in cycle 02E5.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00838
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB states that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the closeout date of the decoration must be on or before the promotion eligibility cutoff date (PECD). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 11 July 2003, for...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00743 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The date the Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP) for the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), First Oak Leaf Cluster (1OLC), awarded for the period 28 Apr 98 to 11 Sep 00, was placed into official channels be changed from 13 Jun...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03144
He was ineligible for consideration for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant during the 03E5 cycle because he did not possess the required Air Force Specialty Code skill level. The unit commander at that time could have approved a skill level waiver but did not. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to...