RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02312
INDEX CODES: 108.00, 123.00
COUNSEL: VETERANS OF FOREIGN
WARS
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her separation orders show her step-children as dependents.
She be medically retired.
Her convalescent leave and quarters be counted as lost time.
Her Persian Gulf time be reflected on her DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and
recommended denial. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit
C.
AFPC/DPPD reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 1
Mar 02 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After careful
consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of
record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant
corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory
opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not
been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis
to disturb the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 01-
02312 in Executive Session on 11 Apr 02, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Aug 01, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, Medical Consultant, dated 16 Nov 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 19 Dec 01.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 30 Jan 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Mar 02.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02312
The applicant was disrespectful to the 831st Air Division Commander on 19 October 1982, in that he did not render proper military courtesies when he was stopped for speeding as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 17 November 1982. b. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Mar 02.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02227 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with theprocedural and substantive...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00693 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01516
On 12 Feb 02, the applicant was notified of his squadron commander’s intent to recommend an other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge for a pattern of misconduct based on the SCM finding, the Article 15 and the LOR. On 14 Feb 02, the applicant requested an administrative discharge board and lengthy service consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the Article 15...
On 12 Feb 02, the applicant was notified of his squadron commander’s intent to recommend an other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge for a pattern of misconduct based on the SCM finding, the Article 15 and the LOR. On 14 Feb 02, the applicant requested an administrative discharge board and lengthy service consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF). The applicant’s area defense counsel (ADC) submitted materials for consideration; however, on 25 Mar 02, the 11th Air Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00578 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry-level separation be upgraded to an honorable discharge and her reenlistment (RE) code changed to allow her the opportunity to reenter the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02545
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02545 INDEX CODE 108.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be afforded the opportunity to appeal before a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) the decision to remove him from the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL). Apparently no response was received and, by letter date 24 Jul 02, HQ...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the former member’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the applicant’s request to upgrade her late husband’s discharge be denied. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPTR states, in part, that there is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00084 (CASE 3) INDEX CODES: 111.02, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 7 Jan 92 through 6 Jan 93 be declared void and removed from her records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...