RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01614
INDEX CODE: 112.00,128.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The number of years of service be corrected and that he be paid for
all the monies due to him.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAOR recommended denial. They indicated that the applicant was
a member of the VARNG for the period 6 May 1952 to 22 June 1954.
Applicant only performed 15 days of active duty during the period he
was in the VARNG. The 15 days active duty were added to the active
duty time performed in the U.S. Air Force for a total of 25 years, 5
months, and 6 days. The total time spent in the ARNG was counted for
pay purposes. Members do not receive day-for-day active duty credit
for computing TAFMSD AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank,
Table 3. Only actual active duty served is credited towards TAFMSD.
Based on governing directives, the applicant’s number of years of
service and credits are correct. If the decision is to grant the
relief sought, the record should be changed to reflect 27 years,
6 months, and 18 days active duty at time of retirement on
30 September 1980.
The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 7 December 2001, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application on 14
February 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, Panel Chair
Ms. Nancy Wells Drury, Member
Mr. Albert J. Starnes, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 June 2001, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAOR, dated 27 November 2001,
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 December 2001.
ROGER E. WILLMETH
Panel Chair
6000.13, dated 30 Jun 97, should be used to determine his DOR. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, the record should be corrected to show that the applicant was appointed into the Air Force Nurse Corps effective 30 Jun 97. A complete copy of the DPPAOR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00256
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00256 INDEX CODE 136.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her time spent on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) [1 year, 5 months, 26 days] be credited towards her total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) for retirement purposes. Time spent on the TDRL is considered a...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00256 INDEX CODE 136.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her time spent on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) [1 year, 5 months, 26 days] be credited towards her total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) for retirement purposes. Time spent on the TDRL is considered a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00640
She enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 January 1985 and was released from active duty on 5 April 1988 and transferred to the Reserves of the Air Force on 6 April 1988 and discharged on 3 February 1999. The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 May 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The...
On 2 Nov 00, applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an E-3, and was given a DOR equal to her date of enlistment (DOE). AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, is the governing directive for computing dates of ranks. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01841
Her date of rank (DOR) be adjusted to reflect her previous active duty Reserve service. The complete DPPAOR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded stating that because of misinformation from her recruiter, she was not able to apply for a waiver or exception to policy concerning Total Active Federal Military Service "TAFMS" requirements to her rank or...
A second payment was received from a collection agency in the amount of $874.64 and was credited on 14 May 2001. The applicant separated from the Air Force before serving the required amount of time to be entitled to the bonus. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 22 June 2000, he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02283
AFPC/DPPAOR indicated the applicant was given credit for all of her active duty time and that her TAFMSD was correct (Exhibit D). EPRs are a record of performance while serving in the military, whether on active duty or in the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01993
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01993 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) with one bronze service star, the Rifle (Marksman) Ribbon, Pistol (Marksman) Ribbon, and the Hand Grenade (Sharpshooter) Ribbon. They further indicated that if he...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02032 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). We note that, to date, the applicant has not provided documentation to substantiate that he was apart of the 357th Infantry, 90th Division. Should the applicant provide this...