Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101285
Original file (0101285.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  01-01285
                       INDEX CODE:  110.00
      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  None

      SSN        HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The statement "Personality Disorder" be deleted from block 28  on  his
DD Form 214.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The aforementioned entry is unnecessary,  derogatory  in  nature,  and
incompatible  to  an  honorable  discharge  certificate.   He  further
contends  that  the  statement   "Personality   Disorder"   could   be
misinterpreted by potential employers during the screening process.

Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 25 Aug 87.

The applicant  was  diagnosed  with  an  Occupational  problem  and  a
Schizoid Personality Disorder on 15 Jan 99.

On 26 Apr  99,  the  applicant's  commander  initiated  administrative
discharge action for conditions (mental disorder) that interfere  with
military service.  The basis for this action  was  that  the  Clinical
Psychologist diagnosed the applicant with an Occupational problem  and
Schizoid  Personality  Disorder  on  15  Jan  99.   The   Psychologist
determined that the applicant's ability to perform effectively in  the
military environment was significantly impaired.  3 MDSS/CC stated  in
a memorandum, "that SSgt S. was evaluated by Mental Health due to  his
severe inability to work effectively with others.  He has demonstrated
no supervisory skills, does not handle conflict well, is difficult  to
communicate with, and prefers to work alone."

The applicant was advised in the notification memorandum of  the  type
of characterization he would receive and that he would  be  ineligible
for reenlistment in  the  Air  Force  and  would  probably  be  denied
enlistment in any component of the armed forces, and any special  pay,
bonus, or education assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.

The applicant was honorably discharged on 17 Jun 99, in the  grade  of
staff sergeant.  He served 11 years, 9 months and 23  days  of  active
service.

Applicant's EPR profile reflects the following:

                 PERIOD ENDING               OVERALL EVALUATION

                   24 Aug 90                       4
                   18 Jul 91                       4
                   18 Nov 91                       4
                   *7 Jun 92                       2
                    7 Jun 93                       4
                    8 Dec 93                       4
                    8 Dec 94                       5
                    8 Dec 95                       4
                    8 Dec 96                       5
                    8 Dec 97                       4
                   10 Jun 98                       3
                   10 Mar 99                       3

* Referral report.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states that it is unusual  after
so many years of service that a service member's reason for  discharge
is Personality Disorder.  Upon reviewing the  applicant's  record  the
underlying disorder had been encountered  throughout  his  career.   A
full evaluation of the applicant's behavior early in his career  would
have identified the disorder and  initiated  his  separation  earlier.
Personality disorders, being a life long indication of an individual's
character makeup, may not  necessarily  eliminate  one  from  military
service  until  the  individual's  ability  to  continue  to  function
appropriately is overstressed by their situation or environment.   The
Medical Consultant believes this is what happened  to  the  applicant,
thus initiating his discharge action.  The evidence of record  clearly
establishes that the applicant's  discharge  was  appropriate  to  the
circumstances of his separation.

A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is attached  at
Exhibit C.

HQ AFPC/DPPRS concurs with the comments  and  recommendations  of  the
AFBCMR Medical Consultant.   DPPRS further states  the  discharge  was
consistent  with  procedural  and  substantive  requirements  of   the
discharge regulation.   Also,  the  discharge  was  within  the  sound
discretion of the discharge authority.  Based on the evidence provided
DPPRS recommends denying the requested relief (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
15 Nov 01, for review and response.  As of this date, no response  has
been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application not timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice warranting a  change  of
reason for discharge.  The Board agrees with the  Medical  Consultant
that it was unusual after so many years of service, that the member's
reason for  discharge  was  Personality  Disorder.   The  applicant's
records indicate that he served successfully for over 11  years.   In
our opinion, the applicant should not have  to  bear  the  burden  of
being labeled as having this disorder  after  serving  satisfactorily
for so long.  In this respect a review of his EPRs indicates that  he
generally  performed  in  an  excellent  manner  despite  front  side
markdowns.   The  applicant's  records  further  reflect   that   his
performance earned him during his  military  service  the  Air  Force
Achievement Medal, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award w/2 devices,  Air
Force Good Conduct Medal w/2 Oak Leaf Clusters,  Air  Force  Overseas
Ribbon Short, Air Force Overseas Ribbon Long w/1  device,  Air  Force
Longevity Service  Award  w/1  device,  Air  Force  Training  Ribbon.
Therefore, the Board recommends changing  the  narrative  reason  for
separation on the DD Form 214 to “Secretarial Authority.”

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 17  June  1999,  he
was  honorably  discharged  under  the  provisions  of  AFI   36-3208,
Secretarial Authority.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 16 January 2002, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Jr., Panel Chair
                 Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Member
                 Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member

All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Apr 01.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated
      1 Oct 01.
      Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 29 Oct 01.
      Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Nov 01.




                       JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN, JR.
                       Panel Chair






AFBCMR 01-01285
INDEX CODE:  110.00


MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered  the  recommendation  of  the  Air
Force Board for Correction for Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code  (70A  Stat  116)  it  is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, SSN, be corrected to show that on 17 June  1999,
he was honorably  discharged  under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-3208,
Secretarial Authority.




                             JOE G. LINEBERGER
                             Director
                             Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03334

    Original file (BC-2006-03334.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was discharged on 25 Aug 99 with an honorable discharge with the narrative reason of Personality Disorder. On 20 Sep 06, the applicant’s counselor/psychotherapist again wrote that “she does not meet the criteria as having Schizoid Personality Disorder.” He did not provide any diagnosis. The preponderance of evidence of record shows that the applicant’s reason for separation was appropriately assigned at the time of separation, although a member with the same condition nine...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200017

    Original file (0200017.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00017 INDEX NUMBER: 100.07;110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 28, “Narrative Reason for Separation,” of his DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty” be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” His records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03078

    Original file (BC-2003-03078.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander in this case clearly considered all of the information the applicant provided. The Consultant provides details and analysis of the applicant’s military and DVA medical records and finds no evidence to support a diagnosis of Behcet’s disease either in service or following discharge. This is why a military member can receive a disability rating from the DVA without being rated by the Air Force, or receive a higher rating from the DVA than the one awarded by the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9802681

    Original file (9802681.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Failure to provide effective counsel during the administrative discharge board and board appeal process. DPPRS recommended the applicant’s request be denied (Exhibit D). Because applicant had a history of missed medical appointments, he received an Article 15 for his failure to go and his commander initiated an administrative discharge action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02171

    Original file (BC-2002-02171.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was evaluated with Acculturation Problem and Cluster A Personality Traits. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 19 June 2002, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority), with a separation code of "JFF." Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Oct 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03035

    Original file (BC-2003-03035.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03035 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00939

    Original file (BC-2002-00939.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Consultant noted that shortly following his discharge from the Air Force, the applicant separated from his wife and applied to the DVA for disability compensation for his various medical problems. He sleeps a lot during the day since he is not able to sleep well during the night and claimed that he has severe sleep apnea. He now requests that he be medically retired from the Air Force as of the date of his separation on 26 Jul 99, contending that he was suffering from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102093

    Original file (0102093.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of airman first class on 15 Feb 00 for Personality Disorder. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE advised that the applicant received a $4000.00 IEB. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that recoupment action of the IEB should be stopped.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01941

    Original file (BC-2004-01941.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 9 February 2004 command-directed Mental Health Evaluation diagnosed the applicant’s conditions as alcohol abuse and personality disorder not otherwise specified with schizoid, obsessive compulsive and narcissistic personality traits, and recommended his administrative discharge for conditions that interfere with military service. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101724

    Original file (0101724.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB states that the first time the contested report was considered in the promotion process was cycle 00E6 to TSgt (promotion effective 1 Aug 00 - 1 Jul 00). The commander determines the rating chain, therefore, the ERAB requested a memorandum from the commander stating the from and through dates of Lt M___’s supervision. We note the applicant has not provided statements from any of...