ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 96- 03056
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
2 4 &li- !99F"s
APPLICANT REOUES TS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2P (Marginal Performer
Assigned to Initial Training) be changed so that she may be able
to enter the Reserves.
RESUME OF CASE:
On 1 7 Apr 9 7 , the Board considered and denied applicant's
request. However, the Board requested she provide information
pertaining to her activities since leaving the service. She was
informed that, should she provide additional evidence pertaining
to post-service activities, the Board may be willing to
reconsider her appeal (see Exhibit E).
On 5 Sep 9 7 , the applicant provided documentation relating to her
post-service activities and requested the Board reconsider her
application (see Exhibit F).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Special Programs & BCMR Manager, AFPC/DPPAES, reviewed this
request and indicated that the RE code '2P" is correct. The type
of discharge drove assignment of the RE code.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at
Exhibit G.
AFBCMR 96-03056
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
6 Oct 97 for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
THE BOARD C ONCLUDES THAT :
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing
the evidence of record, we agree that applicant's separation from
the Air Force was appropriate. It appears that as the record now
stands, she is not eligible to apply for enlistment in the Air
Force Reserves.
After reviewing the statements and
accomplishments pertaining to her post-service conduct, and
noting that she was issued an honorable discharge, we believe her
RE code should be changed to \\RE 3A" in order that she may apply
for enlistment in the Air Force Reserves. The applicant should
be aware, however, that this recommendation in no way establishes
an entitlement to enlist; it only makes her eligible to apply.
Whether or not she is selected for enlistment will be based on
the needs of the service to which application is made.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her RE code,
issued in conjunction with her honorable discharge on 13 Jul 81,
was RE 3A.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 7 June 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603 :
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
AFBCMR 96-03056
Exhibit E. ROP, dated 21 Apr 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 5 Sep 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFPC/DPPAES, .dated 29 Sep 97.
Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 6 Oct 97.
WD c. VAN &&BECK
Panel Chair
3
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02079 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The separation code of JBK (Completion of Required Active Service) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed to LCC (Reduction in Force <Full Separation Pay>) to match the reason for separation...
Applicant's EPR profile follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION 6 Oct 95 3 * 6 Oct 96 3 * Contested report On 11 Aug 97, Applicant was notified that her commander was recommending she be discharged with service characterized as general for minor disciplinary infractions. As a result of the administrative discharge action on 11 Aug 97, the applicant was also ineligible for promotion. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02967 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a favorable code. Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in her military personnel record. Therefore, we have no basis on which to make any changes...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01087 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2P to a favorable code. Therefore, recommend his record be corrected accordingly. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02597
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02597 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. We do not believe that the circumstances surrounding her discharge warrant correction of her RE code to 1J as she requests, but agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that since the RE code of 3A is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02531 INDEX CODE: 100, 100.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for her separation on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed from Miscellaneous/General Reasons to financial hardship and that her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00339
Under current provisions, AFI-36-2606, Reenlistment in the Air Force, a “2P” RE code is used to identify personnel “absent without leave; deserter or dropped from rolls.” However, there is no need to change her RE Code, because it was properly assessed under current provisions at the time. We note that the applicant was discharged from the Air Force for “marginal performance.” The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that she should have received an RE code that would allow her...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00505
On 19 Oct 81, the discharge authority directed applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge. Although the applicant has requested that his separation code be changed to medical reasons or in the best interest of the Air Force, we found no evidence that his physical fitness to perform his duties at the time of his separation was questionable. We note that the BCMR Medical Consultant indicated that the evidence of record supports a change to the applicant’s separation document...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099
In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nonselection for reenlistment and the Unfavorable Information(UIF)/Control Roster actions be rescinded; she be promoted, with all back pay; and she be awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM. DPPAE indicated that a review of the applicant's military personnel records revealed she was nonselected for...