RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02335
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His World War II Air Medal be upgraded to the Distinguished Flying
Cross (DFC).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied. They indicate that
the applicant served on active duty during the period 12 November 1944
through 11 June 1946, with an overseas tour during the period 12
November 1944 through 29 March 1946. His Report of Separation
reflects award of the Air Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern
Campaign Medal with 3 Bronze Service Stars, World War II Victory
Medal, and [Army] Commendation Ribbon. He is also entitled to the
American Campaign Medal, and this has been added to his Report of
Separation.
Applicant claims that on 24 March 1945, on a mission to deliver
gliders filled with troops and ammunition to Germany, his aircraft was
hit by “small arms fire,” and bullets hit him and the crew chief. A
bullet hit the applicant’s chest parachute, and the crew chief was
shot in the leg. The applicant states the crew chief was taken to the
rear of the aircraft, and the applicant removed the bullet and applied
a tourniquet to stop the bleeding. The aircraft diverted to Belgium
to deliver the crew chief to medical personnel.
The applicant provided documentation showing he had applied previously
for this action through Congressional channels, but was told a
written, signed and endorsed recommendation was needed. Applicant did
not provide a written recommendation or statements from anyone with
firsthand knowledge of the events to corroborate his claim that he
saved the crew chief’s life.
Unfortunately, the applicant’s records were destroyed in the 1973 fire
at the National Personnel Records Center. Therefore, there is no
documentation available in his reconstructed records to verify his
unit of assignment (he states he was assigned to the 437th Troop
Carrier Squadron), location, or any actions during his service
overseas. Even after being informed that a written, signed and
endorsed recommendation was necessary for consideration of his claim,
the applicant has not provided any documents/statements to corroborate
his claim that he saved his crew chief’s life on 24 March 1945.
However, the applicant’s Report of Separation reflects award of the
[Army] Commendation Ribbon, awarded by a General Order from the 12th
Army Group, dated 26 June 1945. They believe this decoration may have
been awarded for the applicant’s actions in saving someone’s life.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 28 September 2001, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice warranting that his World
War II Air Medal be upgraded to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Applicant has not established to our satisfaction
that his actions warranted the award of the DFC or that he would have
been recommended for it. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application on 1
November 2001 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, Panel Chair
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
Mr. John E. Pettit, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 24 Sep 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 28 Sep 01.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN, III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03175 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 APR 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His father be awarded the Air Medal (AM) Silver Oak Leaf Cluster (SOLC) and the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) for completing 14 lead crew missions with the 755th Squadron. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03363
DPPPR notes the applicant has applied for the DFC and PHM several times since 1997. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, however, after review of his submission and the evidence of what little record there is available, we are of the opinion that he met the requirement for award of the DFC (number of missions flown and award of six Air Medals) and feel as though he provided enough documentation to show he was recommended for the award of the DFC. FREDERICK R. BEAMAN, III Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00372
Therefore, the facts surrounding his Air Force military service cannot be verified. He entered active duty on 1 June 1944 and was assigned to duties in the Air Corps. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 June 1945, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism while participating as a member of an aircrew...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02836
If one member of a crew receives the DFC all members should. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that in 1944 he and others were selected to be lead crew and would receive the DFC upon completion of 30 missions. He states that AFPC has erred in their recommendation and that he should be granted the medal as well as the recognition of a certificate.
Although there is no longer any record of a DFC recommendation being submitted into official channels, they believe that it was submitted, but the FEAF Commander awarded him a Letter of Commendation, in lieu of the DFC. Although the applicant was recommended for the DFC, there is no evidence the recommendation was approved. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01849
On 6 September 2006, the Board staff forwarded the applicant a corrected copy of the Air Force evaluation for his review and response. The applicant is requesting award of the SM, PH, PLR and PUC. KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-01849 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed the application and states that applicant, along with all crew members who flew evacuation flights, received the Air Medal in recognition for their meritorious achievement. We recognize the periods of these awards will overlap; however, since the Air Medal was awarded for flights in C-46 and C-47 cargo aircraft and the award of Soldier’s Medal is recommended based on voluntary mercy missions flown in L-4J...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03814
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03814 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 APRIL 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and the Soldier’s Medal (SM) as recognition for taking charge of surviving military personnel after their C-47 airplane crashed. The...
He be promoted to the grade of captain in 1945 upon separation from active duty or in 1950 after serving an additional five years in the Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded a DFC since he and the pilot were recommended at the same time and for the same mission and the pilot received his DFC; or in the alternative, he should be awarded the DFC based on the completion of 35 combat missions. A complete...