RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02024
INDEX CODE: A79.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He became involved in several illegal activities while serving in the Air
Force. This included the sale and abuse of illicit drugs. He was
eventually court-martialed and given an undesirable discharge.
He has become a productive member of society. He has maintained 25 years
of abstinence from chemical dependency; has maintained a clean record; and
is a certified counselor for the State of New York.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 293,
Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces
and a copy of his resume, which includes his work and treatment experience.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member who was discharged with an undesirable
discharge on 21 February 1956, under the provisions of AFR 39-17
(Unfitness). He had served 1 year and 26 days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at
Exhibit C.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the official documents
at Exhibit B and in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force at Exhibit D. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these
facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommended that the discharge be upgraded to general on the
basis of clemency, if a check of the FBI files proves negative. The
complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant stated he would respond to the evaluation once the FBI report
was received (Exhibit F). The applicant was provided a copy of the FBI
report and was asked to provide information pertaining to his activities
since leaving the Air Force (Exhibit G, with attachment). The applicant’s
responses, with attachments, are at Exhibits H-1 through H-3.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. The Board finds no error or injustice in the characterization of the
applicant’s discharge. It appears that responsible officials applied
appropriate standards in effecting the applicant’s separation, and we do
not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or
that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the
time of discharge. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings
were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the
existing circumstances. Nevertheless, while the Board does not condone the
behavior that led to the applicant’s discharge, we note that he has had to
live with its adverse effects for over 45 years and we believe it would be
an injustice for him to continue to suffer from its effects. Therefore, we
find that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge to general,
under honorable conditions, is warranted on the basis of clemency. His
request for an honorable discharge was considered in light of his
accomplishments since leaving the service; however, in view of his overall
record of service, we do not believe that an upgrade of his discharge to
fully honorable is warranted.
4. The documentation provided with this case was sufficient to give the
Board a clear understanding of the issues involved and a personal
appearance, with or without counsel, would not have materially added to
that understanding. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 21 February 1956, he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 6 December 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated10 Aug 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Sep 01.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 21 Sep 01.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Sep 01.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 11 Oct 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letters, Applicant, dated 7 and 10 Nov 01, w/atchs.
JOHN L. ROBUCK
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 01-02024
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to, be corrected to show that on 21 February 1956, he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02024
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02024 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was told by the Air Force that his discharge would be upgraded to honorable in six months. Therefore, based on the information and evidence provided they recommend...
On 7 May 54, he received an undesirable discharge from the Air Force. By letter dated 27 August 2001, it was requested that the applicant provide evidence pertaining to his post-service activities (Exhibit G). Exhibit B.
The commander told him he could, but that he would have to receive and undesirable discharge; however, after his discharge he could request the Veterans Administration (VA) upgrade his discharge to general. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. Exhibit B.
On 23 April 1963, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s appeal for an upgrade of his discharge (Exhibit B). Accordingly, they recommend his records remain the same. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we find no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's discharge.
The available relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s reconstructed military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Based on the activities reflected in the FBI report, we also find no compelling reason to warrant upgrading his discharge on the basis of clemency. Exhibit C. FBI Report.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02031 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The Board also invited the applicant provide additional evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. In a letter, dated 15 April 2002, the applicant states that he has no excuse for the way he acted...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03376
On 11 Dec 59 and 18 Oct 78, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01937
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01937 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant’s application is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the...
However, considering the discharge occurred over 44 years ago and his remarks about his young age, DPPRS recommends clemency. If a check of the Federal Bureau of Investigation files proves negative, DPPRS recommends the discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge (Exhibit C). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02156 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). From 29 August 1952 to 24 September 1952, he was confined in civilian jail. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...