Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01937
Original file (BC-2003-01937.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  03-01937
            INDEX CODE:  110.02
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The applicant proffers no contentions.  In support of his  application,  the
applicant provides a copy of  a  letter  from  the  Department  of  Veterans
Affairs (DVA), indicating that his service for  the  period  July  23,  1954
through  January  14,  1956  was  considered  honorable  for  VA   purposes.
Applicant’s application is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 23 July 1954, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the  age
of 17 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of 4 years.

On 8 October 1954, he was charged with disobeying a lawful order.  For  this
incident, punishment under Article 15,  Uniform  Code  of  Military  Justice
(UCMJ), was imposed.  He was reduced from the grade of  airman  third  class
(E-2) to the grade of airman basic

From 28 December 1954 to  14  January  1955,  he  was  charged  with  Absent
Without Leave (AWOL).  For this incident, he  was  convicted  by  a  Summary
Court-Martial. He was sentenced to confinement at hard  labor  for  30  days
and forfeiture of twenty-five dollars ($25) of his pay.

On  2  December  1955,   a   psychiatric   statement   was   issued   by   a
Neuropsychiatric   Clinic,   with   a   diagnosis   of   sexual   deviation,
homosexuality (overt), class II.

On  14  December  1955,  the  applicant’s  commander   initiated   discharge
proceedings against him under the provisions of AFR  35-66  (Homosexuality).
The applicant was notified of his commander’s  recommendation  and  that  an
Undesirable discharge was being recommended.  He was advised of  his  rights
in the matter.  On 16 December 1955, the discharge  authority  approved  the
recommended separation and directed  that  the  applicant  be  furnished  an
Undesirable Discharge certificate.

On 14 January 1956,  the  applicant  was  discharged  with  an  undesirable
discharge.  He had served 1 year, 4 months and 5 days on active duty.

On 22 September 1972,  the  Air  Force  Board  for  Correction  of  Military
Records considered and  denied  the  applicant’s  request  for  a  discharge
upgrade.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation  (FBI)
provided a copy of an investigative  report  pertaining  to  the  applicant,
which is at Exhibit F.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS states that while the applicant provides no facts  warranting  an
upgrade of his discharge, the incident did  occur  over  45  years  ago  and
under today’s  guidance  applicant  would  most  likely  receive  a  general
discharge.  DPPRS would not be opposed  to  upgrading  his  discharge  to  a
general (under honorable conditions) if a check of  the  Federal  Bureau  of
Investigation files proves negative.  The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 11 July 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review  and  comment.   As  of  this  date,  this  office  has
received no response (Exhibit D).

On 12 August 2003, a letter was forwarded to the applicant  suggesting  that
he consider providing evidence pertaining to  his  post-service  activities.
As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit E).

On 26 August 2003, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to  the  applicant
for review and comment.  As of  this  date,  this  office  has  received  no
response (Exhibit F).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  warrant  an  upgrade
of the  applicant’s  discharge.   In  this  regard,  no  evidence  has  been
presented which would lead the Board to believe  the  applicant’s  discharge
was improper or contrary to the  directive  under  which  it  was  effected.
However, we note that AFPC/DPPRS  recommends  clemency,  if  an  FBI  report
proves negative.  In addition, the incident occurred over 45 years  ago  and
that  under  today’s  guidance  he  would  most  likely  receive  a  general
discharge.  The Board notes  the  FBI  report  does  contain  some  entries;
however, the last entry occurred in 1967 over 35 years ago.  Therefore,  the
Board is of the opinion that upgrading the applicant’s discharge to  general
(under honorable  conditions),  based  on  clemency  would  be  appropriate.
Applicant’s request for fully honorable discharge was  considered;  however,
we  do  not  believe  the  overall  record  supports  a   further   upgrade.
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to  the  extent
indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT, be  corrected  to  show  that  on  14  January  1956,  he  was
discharged  with  service  characterized   as   general   (under   honorable
conditions).

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 9 October 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Panel Chair
            Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
            Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Jun 03 w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 7 Jul 03.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jul 03.
      Exhibit E.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 Aug 03.
      Exhibit F.  Letter, FBI Report, dated 15 Aug 03 w/atchs.




                                   GREGORY H. PETKOFF
                                   Panel Chair

AFBCMR BC-2003-01937





MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to xxxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that on 14 January 1956, he
was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).





            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000637

    Original file (0000637.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s grade at the time of discharge was airman basic (A/B). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states the applicant was court-martialed for being AWOL and was sentenced to 3 months at hard labor and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03923

    Original file (BC-2003-03923.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant has submitted a copy of her late husband’s death certificate, and a copy of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center dated 12 November 2003. Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide facts that support upgrading the discharge to honorable (Exhibit C). Novel, Panel Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Nov 03, with attachments.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000936

    Original file (0000936.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00936 INDEX NUMBER:106.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Other facts surrounding his discharge from the Air Force are unknown inasmuch as the complete discharge correspondence is not available. Applicant submitted a brief summary of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02035

    Original file (BC-2003-02035.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an Investigation Report pertaining to the applicant, which is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that due to the lack of documentation to support the applicant’s discharge process, his young age at the time, and considering the incident occurred over 45 years ago, they would not be opposed to the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03075

    Original file (BC-2006-03075.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03075 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 APRIL 2008 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In addition, he states his supervisor indicated his discharge would be automatically...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02832

    Original file (BC-2003-02832.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Discharge Authority approved his request for discharge and ordered an undesirable discharge on 9 April 1957. Based on the foregoing clemency considerations, we believe that his discharge should be upgraded to “under honorable conditions.” _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 29 April 1957, he was discharged with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00148

    Original file (BC-2003-00148.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 October 1957, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. He had served 2 years and 24 days on active duty. Additionally, the discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00759

    Original file (BC-2005-00759.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the applicant (Identification Record No. GREGORY H. PETKOFF Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04052

    Original file (BC-2002-04052.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Specification 3: He did, on or about 13 December 1955, without proper authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to the office of the Commander. He did not seem to be able to adjust to the Air Force, his job or the men for whom he worked. On 2 December 1958, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02993

    Original file (BC-2003-02993.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02993 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...