RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03201
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart Medal.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was involved in an airplane crash on 8 Nov 44 in Mersburg, Germany.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a copy of his WD AGO
Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable
Discharge) and Veterans Administration documentation.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Available documentation indicates that the applicant enlisted in the
Army of the United States (AUS) on 3 Apr 43.
A WD AGO Form 38, Report of Physical Examination of Enlisted Personnel
Prior to Discharge, Release from Active Duty or Retirement, indicates
that the applicant fractured his nose in B-17 airplane crash in Nov 44
in England. Cartilage was removed from his nose in May 45.
On 30 Sep 45, the applicant was honorably discharged under the
provisions AR 615-365 (Convenience of the Government).
Effective 24 Nov 98, the applicant was granted a service connection
for his nasal fracture (left side), with a disability rating of 10
percent.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Recognition Programs Branch, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed this application
and recommended denial. According to DPPPR, to be awarded the Purple
Heart Medal, a member must provide documentation to support he was
wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received
medical treatment by medical personnel. In addition, it is necessary
that the wound required or received medical treatment by medical
personnel. Indirect injuries do not meet the Purple Heart Medal
criteria. Indirect injuries include but are not limited to, diseases,
exposure, injuries, received while seeking shelter from mortar or
rocket attacks, aircraft bombings, grenades, and injuries incurred
while serving as an aircraft member or in a passenger status as a
result of the aircraft’s evasive measures against hostile fire.
DPPPR noted that the applicant’s request was forwarded to the Purple
Heart Review Board (PHRB) on 8 May 01. The PHRB determined that the
applicant did not have sufficient documentation to approve the Purple
Heart Medal. The applicant did have medical documentation; however,
it was six months after the incident, and it indicated that only a
deviated nasal septum was corrected.
DPPPR indicated that the PHRB has the authority, on behalf of the
Secretary of the Air Force, to determine a veteran’s entitlement to
the Purple Heart Medal. Each request is considered on the policies
and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the
determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented.
In DPPPR’s view, there was no evidence in the applicant’s military
personnel or medical records that supports that he was injured as a
direct result of enemy action. Therefore, they were unable to
determine the applicant’s eligibility for the Purple Heart Medal.
A complete copy of the DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 15
Jun 01 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice. No
evidence has been presented which has shown to our satisfaction that
the applicant met the established criteria for award of the Purple
Heart Medal. In view of the above, and in the absence of clear-cut
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 18 Jul 01, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Apr 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 29 May 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 15 Jun 01.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
The applicant’s case file reveals that the Director, Personnel Accountability, HQ AFPC/DPW, requested the applicant’s discharge document be corrected to reflect he was a POW from 22 Feb 45 to 29 Apr 45. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Recognition Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, stated that the applicant’s request for award of the Purple Heart (PH) medal was forwarded to the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) on 4 Jan 00. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01738
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial. They indicated that the applicant has not provided any information or documentation regarding a wound or injury incurred as a result of enemy action. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 October 2003.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02262
In accordance with Army Regulation 600-45, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against the enemy or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided the wound necessitated treatment by medical personnel. The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB), on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, has the authority to determine a veteran’s entitlement to the PH. The PH is awarded for injuries received as a direct result of enemy action.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03408
The documentation provided by the applicant and the limited military records of the servicemember do not substantiate he had an injury that met the criteria for award of the PH. Nor has the applicant or the servicemember provided any evidence to substantiate the request for award of the PH, such as an eyewitness statement verifying the cause of the crash. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jan 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01814
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the PH medal. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, the majority of the Board believes he did not provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate his claim that he was wounded in action as a direct result of enemy action, or that he was recommended for, or awarded, the Purple Heart Medal. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03832
DPPPR states to be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. After a thorough review of the former member’s wife’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the PH Medal. Novel, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Dec 05, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02775
To be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. Each request is considered on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. Neither evidence provided by the applicant nor the service-member’s records substantiate he was injured as a direct result of enemy action...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00236
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00236 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 JUL 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH). The applicant submitted an application dated 19 March 1982 requesting award of the PH. ...
DPPPR indicated that the Purple Heart Medal is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, or forced aircraft bail out injuries). According to DPPPR, there was no evidence in the applicant's medical or personnel records which were provided that he had been injured as a direct result of enemy action. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 3 Nov 00.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02041
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded the PH for wounds he received while trying to save victims of a B-24 aircraft crash and a bomb aboard the aircraft exploded. In a letter, dated 9 January 2006, applicant requested his application be reopened and provided the following comments. Further, the applicant has not provided any evidence to indicate that he was recommended for, or awarded the BSM and CIB.